advertisement
About Advertising Industry

BNET Advertising provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about the major agencies in advertising, marketing, and public relations. In addition to detailed company and agency profiles, we bring you detailed industry analysis on new partnerships and acquisitions, ad buying and cost, new investments, inventory issues, and other issues critical to the marketing sector.

At WPP, Martin Sorrell Indulges His Inner Economics Professor

By Jim Edwards | Nov 4, 2008

wpp1.jpgSir Martin Sorrell, chief of agency holding company WPP, inserted a curious rant about economics into his third quarter earnings press release. WPP – which includes ad agencies such as Ogilvy & Mather, JWT and Grey Global Group – normally makes a fairly staid statement of its finances and restricts its commentary to corporate strategy and lists of regions and businesses that are growing. Not this time.

In a section devoted to the affect of the turmoil in the stock markets, Sorrell’s statement took a detour through a history of modern political economy, hailing the rebirth of the theories of John Maynard Keynes, bidding adieu to the conservative extremism of Milton Friedman, and proclaiming an era of Soviet-style corporate capitalism. Sorrell’s statement then ended on a semi-religious note about “Armageddon.”

Here’s the relevant section:

… the revival of Keynesian economic policy and eclipse of Friedmanite monetarism, along with state-directed capitalism, have pumped and will pump massive amounts of liquidity into the system, possibly resulting in a surge in inflation, not unhelpful, at least, in the early stages of an upturn in stimulating economic activity. [He predicts that the effect on WPP wil be mixed, and then adds:] Whatever the pattern, it is not likely that our budget will reflect the Armageddon currently predicted by the fall in stock prices.

There is no explanation as to what prompted Sorrell’s undergraduate-sociology-major-style musings. Perhaps one clue is to be found on the cover of the presentation to analysts. It features a small herd of antelope, a mud hut and a tree, drawn in a primitivist style. Might it possibly depict a future that Sorrell is afraid could come to pass?

Jim Edwards, a former managing editor of Adweek, has covered drug marketing at Brandweek for four years, and is a former Knight-Bagehot fellow at Columbia University's business and journalism schools. Follow him on Twitter or send him an email.

BNET User Analysis

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    arukundo

    11/05/08 | Report as spam

    RE: At WPP, Martin Sorrell Indulges His Inner Economics Professor

    In the short term there are benefits for us guys in the advertising industry because that mean's more revenue for us. In the medium and long term, we must have a plan to maximise the short terms benefits because budgets really will reduce.

    If we look back at the post-Great Depression era, there was an upsurge in launching of new "brands" at the time, not linked to the massive amounts of liquidity in the market, but the need from consumers for brands and products that they themselves needed or wanted due to their lifestyle.

    What I see is simple- with added liquidity in the market-place comes improvement in the lives of this consumer, which will then be converted into need for more consumer products/ brands and that's where we come in- the ad industry.

    God bless!

    Alex Rukundo

  •  
    2

    arukundo

    11/05/08 | Report as spam

    RE: At WPP, Martin Sorrell Indulges His Inner Economics Professor

    An addition!

    I strongly believe there will continue to be a difference between America's and Europe's economic policies. America will have some form of regulation, but conservative fiscal-free market principles will still rein high; Europe on the other hand will regulate further, especially from a centralised bloc-perspective. The rest of the world will fall behind the biggest winner, i.e. The Gulf States and the Middle East will be more prudent where they keep their money, while China, Russia and some of these States that once had alot of faith in the American system will be more prudent and spread their wealth into revenue-generating assets in emerging markets as opposed to speculative reserves and stocks in the West.

    What does that mean for us? A bit of Keynes and abit of Smith- no total washout of either or!

    Alex Rukundo

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement