advertisement
About Advertising Industry

BNET Advertising provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about the major agencies in advertising, marketing, and public relations. In addition to detailed company and agency profiles, we bring you detailed industry analysis on new partnerships and acquisitions, ad buying and cost, new investments, inventory issues, and other issues critical to the marketing sector.

NY Spends $17 Million on Saatchi 'Clip Art' Logo

By Jim Edwards | Nov 14, 2008

parks385_432837a.gifSaatchi & Saatchi has charged New York State $17 million for a clip art squirrel.* New York state is to spend $17 million on a Saatchi & Saatchi campaign featuring what appears to be a clip art squirrel. The move came after the agency was asked to redesign the New York famous “I Love NY” logo, which adorns millions of T-shirts and shopping bags. But the new logo is virtually unchanged from the old one — save for the addition of a silhouette of a small squirrel and a butterfly, which are meant to suggest that New York has a countryside as well as a city.

According to a NYS spokesperson:

It’s pretty brave of us to change a logo that’s been around for 31 years.

iheartsnowtm_1_385_432835a.gifWell, not that brave. All that seems to have happened is that Saatchi has found a library of free images such as this one, and snaffled a butterfly and a squirrel from them. Pepsi recently commissioned a new logo from the Arnell Group (which looks suspiciously like an old Diet Pepsi logo, or even the Obama campaign logo) and paid $1 million.

The move (or at least the cost of it) has — entirely predictably — sparked outrage. Says the London Times:

Squirrels don’t work for me; why spend $17m on a new ‘I love NY’ logo? Leave the imitations to the copycats.

ilnystakt2c385_432836a.gifTo be fair, the agency also added cartoon snow to another version of the logo — something we’ve all done ourselves when we made homemade Xmas cards as children. Which raises the timeless exclamation that society always makes to itself when confronted with overpriced art –”My kid could have done that!” In fact they’re already saying that over at Tribble:

It’s an outrage to say the least, and it’s your tax dollars at work. Honestly look at the logos below, and tell us if you feel the 17 million dollars was well spent?

We’re expecting a blast from George Parker any second. (Update: Here it is, right on schedule!)

Claim: More time was spent constructing Bob Isherwood’s hair than creating this logo.

Update: Tribble Agency has kindly posted a PDF of the new logo’s usage guide — and as with all documents written by uptight art directors it’s hilarious. Among the banned usages are a big “screw you” to small businesses in New York. They won’t be allowed to use the logo to advertise such things as:

  • All the buffalo wings you can eat $19.99
  • The potato sack races of the Hudson Valley
  • Hot sugar doughnuts

The PDF features a full catalog of the new clip-art-improved logo, along with a list of ways it may not be used, such as don’t display it diagonally! For god’s sake! Keep it horizontal!

The PDF also contains the interesting admission that:

Over time, I LOVE NEW YORK has become more and more fragile due to brand dilution and a need for a firm structure and a focused message.

That sounds like a coded “screw you” to Eric Mower & Associates, who handled the brand before Saatchi won it.

*This item was corrected to reflect the fact that the campaign as a whole will cost $17 million, not Saatchi’s fee.

Jim Edwards, a former managing editor of Adweek, has covered drug marketing at Brandweek for four years, and is a former Knight-Bagehot fellow at Columbia University's business and journalism schools. Follow him on Twitter or send him an email.

BNET User Analysis

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    AdScam

    11/14/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Saatchi Charges $17 Million for 'I Love NY' Logo Clip Art

    JIM

    Great post. You just can't get over the stupidness of BDA's. They NEVER learn.
    Posted about it on AdScam.
    Cheers/George

  •  
    2

    BNET's Jim Edwards

    11/15/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Saatchi Charges $17 Million for 'I Love NY' Logo Clip Art

    A reader writes:

    Jim,

    I enjoy poking fun at government misappropriation and idiocy as much as the next guy, but you really think $17M was spent on logos? Isn't it customary to do even a cursory check of facts before running with a story? If you had done even the slightest bit of due diligence, say a google search or a peak at the NYTimes, you would have found that I Love NY did a full re-launched the campaign, not the logos, earlier this year. Having read some of these articles and seen stories on the news myself, i can tell you that in addition to logos, the state spent its $17 Million on seasonal and brand campaign advertising, a redesigned of travel publications and a re-design of the iloveny.com website. There are many things governments do that are worth poking fun at and that they owe the public apologies for. It looks like you're the one that owes the apology in this case and i sincerely hope you post a correction for your readers.

    Zach

  •  
    3

    AdScam

    11/15/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Saatchi Charges $17 Million for 'I Love NY' Logo Clip Art

    Zach...
    This is blogging. What the **** does it have to do with facts. Why do you think Matt Drudge is so popular? Having said that, for the public to swallow it, there always has to be a germ of truth in the accusation... That's why ad people are at the bottom of the "trust" totem pole, along with second hand car salesmen and lawyers, not to forget politicos. At the end of the day, the "Adverati" ripped off NYC. You have to know that.
    Cheers/George

  •  
    4

    mbarilla

    11/21/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Saatchi Charges $17 Million for 'I Love NY' Logo Clip Art

    OK I just skimmed the Brand Guidelines (thank you for posting them) and am able to say that this blog post is completely off the mark.

    The "clip art" treatments are seasonal - not the main logo. There are multiple other (clever) iterations of the logo, and they do the job of portraying the I heart NY logo as "not just New York City."

    And yes, it might cost 17 million, but that is (I assume) the entire budget, as you've later pointed out. In advertising, that price for an entire campaign is not that outlandish.

    Yes, they didn't overly redesign the identity - but they obviously didn't want to. The brand guidelines explicitly state what a strong brand equity the mark has, and they wanted to reiterate that equity rather than redesign it and start over.

    Please be fair and give credit where credit is due. The campaign may be simplistic, and you might not like it, but don't call it something it isn't. They did a very nice job, overall.

  •  
    5

    AlSharif

    11/23/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Saatchi Charges $17 Million for 'I Love NY' Logo Clip Art

    Check out page 40 in the guideline, aren't they breaking their own rule with the tiny footer logo?

    And the illustrated ads look amateur to me.

  •  
    6

    gatz

    12/02/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Saatchi Charges $17 Million for 'I Love NY' Logo Clip Art

    My first inclination is: Never (re)touch a classic!

    I get it: seasons, culture, arts, cuisine??? Come see and love all that is NY.
    Given the ubiquitous charm of the IHeartNY logo, and the pride it instills in even the most nomadic native son and daughter worldwide (myself included), it is understandable city PR execs were wary of too much of a change.

    But merely tweaking such a classic logo so mildly not only fails to take advantage of ??ber agency Saatchi & Saatchi???s strengths - it also fails sorely to justify the price tag. (focusing on logo for article commentary/$17 million overall campaign cost duly noted)
    S&S is best at its most dynamic, and clients should be sure they???re ready for a high-trajectory change before commissioning at this level. More interesting would be a review of the rejected ideas before what seems like cold feet set it (by S&S or NY?). The city could have saved much on its budget by using someone in house. The resulting logo looks as if it did, anyway.

    To quote an old SNL skit: ???Who are the ad wizards who came up with this one????

    Having fun with a classic image is fine, truly. And the IHeartNY variations presented are, indeed, fun, almost clever. But don't pretend these logos are anything more than banner-ad quality. This is not anything I'd associate with a top international ad agency, nor is it a worthy face-lift for such a NY grand dame.

    "I Heart a NY Classic!"
    (says a New Yorker in Old Amsterdam)

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here