advertisement
About Advertising Industry

BNET Advertising provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about the major agencies in advertising, marketing, and public relations. In addition to detailed company and agency profiles, we bring you detailed industry analysis on new partnerships and acquisitions, ad buying and cost, new investments, inventory issues, and other issues critical to the marketing sector.

ValueClick Settles Sham Sweepstakes Suit for $10M; Winners Offered a Nonexistent Hummer

By Jim Edwards | Aug 26, 2009

ValueClick has settled a class-action suit brought by shareholders for $10 million. The shareholders — union pension funds and the like — alleged that ValueClick’s management damaged its own stock price by not disclosing to investors that parts of its business were based on fraud.

ValueClick previously paid a $2.9 million settlement to the FTC for using deceptive online tactics to gain consumers’ information and then not safeguarding their privacy.

According to the complaint, ValueClick was guilty of advertising “free” gifts to consumers, even though consumers were required to make a purchase before receiving the gifts.

At one point, ValueClick ran a sham sweepstakes, the complaint alleges. The prizes included a Ford F-150 pick-up truck, a Hummer and a college scholarship. But, the complaint alleges:

… the sweepstakes campaigns were phony.

… No drawings were held, and there were no procedures for selecting a winner.

… sweepstakes prizes were not purchased or secured by the Company for the winner, as these campaigns were nothing more than a phony gimmick designed to gain the entrants’ personal information for resale to ValueClick’s advertising customers.

… all entry forms received by the Company went into large bags that were not segregated by sweepstakes campaign, and these bags were ultimately disposed of by the Company.

ValueClick denied the claims. Download its motion to dismiss here.

Jim Edwards, a former managing editor of Adweek, has covered drug marketing at Brandweek for four years, and is a former Knight-Bagehot fellow at Columbia University's business and journalism schools. Follow him on Twitter or send him an email.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • ValueClick *proposed settlement in shareholder lawsuit over ‘deceptive’ practices

    Adotas - 89 days 3 hours 6 minutes ago

    ADOTAS — While it now has an underperforming lead generation business, and with speculation it might be sold, a *recently proposed $10 million settlement in a lawsuit brought by shareholders, and the details of it, does not put ValueClick’s past practices in a good light. ValueClick denied the allegations at the time the lawsuit was filed....

  • Lilly - Zyprexa: "How does a company defend itself after pleading guilty?"

    PharmaGossip - 299 days 14 hours 35 minutes ago

    Eli Lilly & Co., after pleading guilty and agreeing to spend more than $2.6 billion to settle government and individual claims over its antipsychotic Zyprexa, still faces lawsuits over the drug that might cost the company another $2 billion. Not part of the settlements were suits by 12 states and a class-action case brought by pension funds,...

  • UnitedHealth will pay $350M to settle AMA class-action over Ingenix data

    Fierce Healthcare - 313 days 1 hour 11 minutes ago

    Just days after cutting a $50 million deal with the state of New York to address similar issues, UnitedHealth Group has agreed to pay $350 million to settle a class-action suit brought against it by the American Medical Association alleging that its health plans unfairly used inaccurate pricing data to justify low out-of-network payments....

  • Nurses Win Settlement Over Wages

    Wall Street Journal - 260 days 15 hours 45 minutes ago

    A health-care network agreed to settle a class-action suit alleging managers conspired to keep nurses' wages artificially low

  • Suit: Virgin Mobile Undervalued In Sprint Deal

    Information Week - 98 days 23 hours 18 minutes ago

    The lawsuit was filed in New Jersey by the law firm Levi & Korinsky, and it alleges the deal would be unfair because it does not take adequate steps to maximize value for Virgin Mobile shareholders. The deal consists of exchanging stock and assuming debt, and it is expected to equal about $483 million when it closes in late 2009 or early 2010....

 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement