advertisement
About Advertising Industry

BNET Advertising provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about the major agencies in advertising, marketing, and public relations. In addition to detailed company and agency profiles, we bring you detailed industry analysis on new partnerships and acquisitions, ad buying and cost, new investments, inventory issues, and other issues critical to the marketing sector.

WPP in Talks to End Patterson Suit; Pact Could Head Off Embarrassment for CEO Sorrell

By Jim Edwards | Nov 5, 2009

WPP is in talks to settle its suit against Pacific Equity Partners over the acquisition of Australia’s famous George Patterson agency, the shop that gave the world the “It’s a big ad!” spot for Carlton beer. A settlement would avoid a March 2010 trial, The Australian reports. A deal would extract WPP from several potentially embarrassing scenarios, one of which embroils the global head of Y&R Brands.

The back story: WPP bought The Communications Group for $80 million from Pacific Equity Partners. It sued PEP when two key executives left Patterson and the shop lost clients such as Foster’s, National Australia Bank and Cricket Australia. WPP claimed that the two execs, Anthony Heraghty and James McGrath, had been given “secret payments” to induce them to stay with the agency for one year; had WPP known of the payments — and the consequent likelihood the pair would leave when the year was up — it would have paid much less, WPP claims. WPP’s Y&R Brands is seeking $10 million AUD in damages.

A confidential settlement would have some advantages for WPP. First, it would mean that Y&R Advertising chief Hamish McLennan (pictured) would not be forced onto the stand to testify under oath about what he knew about the alleged “secret payments.” PEP claims McLennan was informed of the payments in a phonecall prior to the acquisition; McLennan says PEP’s lawyers behaved disingenuously regarding disclosure of the payments.

Second, it would mean that WPP could extract itself from the embarrassing position of suing its own client. After leaving George Patterson Y&R, Heraghty joined Foster’s beer, a WPP client. Foster’s then axed Y&R from its account.

Third, it would mean that WPP’s lawyers could avoid another defeat based on stakes the company has taken in smaller agencies. WPP recently lost a lawsuit in which it accused Spot Runner of selling stock without telling WPP, that loss turned on WPP’s lawyers’ failure to closely read an email that Spot Runner sent to WPP.

Bonus points: If you spotted that The Australian referred to McLennan as WPP CEO Martin Sorrell’s “Australian apprentice.”

Jim Edwards, a former managing editor of Adweek, has covered drug marketing at Brandweek for four years, and is a former Knight-Bagehot fellow at Columbia University's business and journalism schools. Follow him on Twitter or send him an email.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Sorrell's day in court

    The Australian News - 154 days 3 hours 2 minutes ago

    Peter Wilson and Lara Sinclair | June 22, 2009 SPECULATION the acrimonious court case between WPP's Young & Rubicam Brands, and executives from Pacific Equity Partners and the agency it sold to WPP, George Patterson Partners, could be settled in mediation, appears to have been scuttled. WPP chief Martin Sorrell last week claimed the other side...

  • WPP’s war over the George Patterson sale ends with apology from Heraghty and McGrath

    Mumbrella - 13 days 18 hours 42 minutes ago

    After more than three years, WPP has ended its war with Pacific Equity Partners over the sale of advertising agency George Patterson. Part of the deal was the issuing of “an unreserved apology” by former senior executives Anthony Heraghty and James McGrath.   The settlement comes in the same week that the agency – now George Patterson

  • Sir Martin: looking forward to the court action

    Campaign Brief - 153 days 13 hours 28 minutes ago

    Peter Wilson and Lara Sinclair report in the Media section of The Australian today that speculation the acrimonious court case between WPP's Young & Rubicam Brands, and executives from Pacific Equity Partners and the agency it sold to WPP, George Patterson Partners, could be settled in mediation, appears to have been scuttled.

  • WPP Alleges "Secret Payments" Spoiled Deal With George Patterson, Communications Group

    BNET Advertising - 198 days 42 minutes ago

    WPP is suing a private equity firm and the directors of Australia’s George Patterson and The Communications Group agencies over an $80 million deal struck in 2005 that has since gone wrong, the Sydney Morning Herald reports. The agencies are known for the world famous Foster’s beer campaigns. The case is the second recent one in which WPP...

  • WPP wins Patts “secret payments” case and gets apology

    B&T - 13 days 17 hours 6 minutes ago

    The protracted legal battle between WPP and Pacific Equity Partners over secret payments made to two executives during the $80 million sale of George Patterson has finally been settled with PEP backing down and former Patts managing director Anthony Heraghty and creative director James McGrath issuing an unreserved apology to the marketing...

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    intheknow

    11/06/09 | Report as spam

    RE: WPP in Talks to End Patterson Suit; Pact Could Head Off Embarrassment for CEO Sorrell

    you are dead wrong on this.

  •  
    2

    intheknow

    11/06/09 | Report as spam

    RE: WPP in Talks to End Patterson Suit; Pact Could Head Off Embarrassment for CEO Sorrell

    you are DEAD wrong on this.

  •  
    3

    BNET's Jim Edwards

    11/06/09 | Report as spam

    RE: WPP in Talks to End Patterson Suit; Pact Could Head Off Embarrassment for CEO Sorrell

    @intheknow: I'd love to hear your explanation ...

  •  
    4

    intheknow

    11/09/09 | Report as spam

    RE: WPP in Talks to End Patterson Suit; Pact Could Head Off Embarrassment f

    told ya so!

    easy to always blame the holding co's and hold them up as
    examples from the axis of evil but you got totally the wrong end
    of the stick on this one, any chance of a correction or is this
    already digital fish and chips wrapping?

  •  
    5

    BNET's Jim Edwards

    11/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: WPP in Talks to End Patterson Suit; Pact Could Head Off Embarrassment for CEO Sorrell

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement