Calvin Klein's "Banned" Orgy Ad Is Part of Predictable Fake Controversy Trend

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

•  
  1

  myson1

  01/30/09 | Report as spam

  RE: Calvin Klein?s ?Banned? Orgy Ad Is Part of Predictable Fake Controversy Trend

  Jim,
  
  This is all getting so "old"! It's looking like the tail-end of reality tv - an idea that was fresh, was overdone, got stale and eventually led to the realization that perhaps "me too" is not a substitute for real talent.
  
  myson1

•  
  2

  salgo

  02/03/09 | Report as spam

  RE: Calvin Klein?s ?Banned? Orgy Ad Is Part of Predictable Fake Controversy Trend

  How do these white people think they are going to reproduce so their segment of the global population does not diminish until it finally disappears? If jeans are obstructing the penetration of a penis into a vagina, the chances of conception are about 1 in 37,596 attempts. Kyoto Idol is perhaps a subversive because by suggesting a menage a trois between two guys and one girl, only one pregnancy could possibly occur, thus wasting one of the male's efforts at reproduction should any conception occur at all. With a male to female ratio of 1:2 chances are much greater that more little white babies could be produced, thus replenishing the shrinking segment of those whose ancestry is European. Personally, I could care if any there are any Europeans around in 300 years or not. Or, any other ethnic or regional division between members of the human. It would be nice if we could acknowledge that when all is said and done, we are all the same species and all that divides us are language, reactionary governments, and racists supporting those governments. But some of the people in 'post-industrial' wealthy countries whose populations are declining, worry about the eventual fate of their progeny in the future. These countries are European nations, those of European ancestry in the US and Canada, and Japan as well (whose citizens were recognized as nominal 'white people' by those paragons of progressive thinking, the leaders of the National Party in South Africa during Apartheid). It seems logical that they should take off their jeans during coitus. if they would take off their jeans while having sex. If they leave their jeans on, the chances of conception remain about 1 in 37,596 attempts. So, if they refuse to take their jeans off, they should get very busy and both men must start ejaculating at least once every 15 minutes each day (a combined total of 192 ejaculations) for 193 days. That would produce a total of 37,576 ejaculations. The fact that the jeans would be soaked in semen and vaginal fluids within a couple of days may seem that it would increase the odds of conception. Unfortunately the sperm will soon die and simply become a barrier so that fresh living sperm will have a greater obstacle to overcome before one can achieve the noble goal of fertilizing one of those little ovum upon which the human race once depended for its survival (of course, we now know that men are obsolete in terms of survival of the human race; however, there remain some conservative types whose distrust of science would make Pope Urban VIII and the flunkies of the Inquisition look like radical empiricists). Of course, it would be pointless to spend so much effort, energy, semen, and vaginal arousal at the time during a cycle when a woman is least fertile. So, it's recommended that if they must have on jeans when having sex, they should concentrate their efforts during 12 days each menstrual cycle when a female is most fertile. With this in mind, those 37,576 ejaculations should be distributed over 15 or 16 menstrual cycles. Let's hope that the magic number is not ejaculation #37,583, since that one never happened. All that energy for nothing. So, for the sake of European progeny take off the jeans when you have sex.