About Auto Industry

Everyone has their eyes on the automotive industry lately. BNET Automotive gathers and supplies daily industry trends and news coverage with specific insights for managers and executives, focusing on the major auto companies and parts manufacturers. In addition to detailed auto company trends and profiles, we report on new alliances and partnerships, new models, mergers and acquisitions, labor management, auto unions, investments, and other key issues related to this sector of business.

Smart Roadster Could Prolong the Fad, But in U.S., It's Not "foryou"

By Jim Henry | Sep 5, 2008

smart_roadster_666660_1197633_4064_2704_a2003f6144_300.bmpEven with today’s expensive gas, I remain skeptical about the Smart car’s staying power in the United States, beyond the first few years, once the initial “early adopters” all have one. Smart made its U.S. debut in January 2008.

Here are my main reasons:

One, the lack of utility. Stating the obvious, it’s just too darn small. The Smart fortwo is great for one person to commute in, or go to the grocery store. After that, the usefulness goes pretty sharply downhill. For most families, in most U.S. markets, that’s not enough to justify buying it. It can hold two people with briefcases, or maybe two people for a weekend trip, provided they don’t have to get dressed up.

Two, even at a starting price of $11,590, the price for the Smart fortwo is too high, considering the above-mentioned lack of utility. I was all set to put down a $99 deposit and order one, until I saw that the price with options was more than half the price of my Subaru Legacy Outback wagon, with nowhere near half the utility. Presumably, I could get a pretty nice used Subaru for less than a new Smart fortwo.

Air conditioning is a $600 option in the base fortwo “Pure” model. Anybody care to try commuting in a suit and tie, without air conditioning? I didn’t think so. Even the radio is optional. The dollar-euro exchange rate isn’t helping.

Three, no matter how many safety features you put in it (which raises the price; see Reason for Skepticism No. 2), most people take one look and say, “What happens when a big truck hits it? No way!” Personally, I don’t find it any scarier than any other car that gets hit by a big truck. It’s sure a lot safer and more comfortable than a motorcycle, and I’m too chicken to drive one of those.

While the fad lasts, the Smart fortwo is selling great. Penske Automotive, which has the U.S. franchise, is looking for ways to get more cars, according to Chairman Roger Penske.

In my opinion, the franchise also gets a new lease on life if it can resurrect the sharp-looking Smart Roadster, which is no longer offered. It never was offered in the United States, but convertibles are always more popular here than in other major global markets. From the outside looking in, there’s no indication that’s happening.

Even if it the Roadster does come here, I think the additional model only pushes the “reset” button for the Smart brand. Unless they can economically build them here and make them a lot cheaper — which implies a much, much bigger sales volume — the fad will be over, at least in the United States.

Jim Henry has been writing about the auto industry from a business perspective for more than 20 years. He is also a member and past president of the New York-based International Motor Press Association.

BNET User Analysis

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    madmilker

    09/06/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Smart Roadster Could Prolong the Fad, But in U.S., It's Not "foryou"

    is2

  •  
    2

    jamie@...

    09/08/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Smart Roadster Could Prolong the Fad, But in U.S., It's Not

    As a European smart roadster driver, I cannot but agree with your sentiments. However, you do not totally do the fourtwo justice.

    You miss out three very relevant facts;

    1. The fourtwo is designed to meet EU safety standards and as such, the triple layered tridion shell is extremely strong and will probably come off the better of a smart vs truck confrontation. There is a story in the UK smartclub magazine from a Canadian forutwo driver who had exactly that situation and puts his continued existence down to the smart's strong safety cage.

    2. You compare it to a Subaru Outback purely on price. The smart is built for a very specific niche - it is a commuter car. It is and was never designed to be an SUV or a family wagon. It will return well over 50mpg (imperial) which further justifies its market.

    3. The fourtwo was the second most environmentally friendly car you could buy according to a recent study by a UK University. (The smart roadster was #1). This study reported on the basis of a "dust to dust" view - i.e. the environmental impact of producing the car, the impact of a lifetime of running one and the impact of disposal and recycling at end of life. For reference, the fashionable favourite of Hollywood, the Toyota Prius was 12th.

    I am sure that the costs of shipping the units from Europe to the States may well add a bit to the overall impact, they still make very good "green" sense.

    I should also point out, that I have been able to do a full week's grocery shopping in my roadie and have driven it from Scotland to Paris (France) and back in 3 days and still been comfortable for the whole trip, so they are acceptable freeway cruisers.

  •  
    3

    jamie@...

    09/08/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Smart Roadster Could Prolong the Fad, But in U.S., It's Not

    The lick to an article about the study I mention above...

    http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle/AllCars/228261/

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here