About Auto Industry

Everyone has their eyes on the automotive industry lately. BNET Automotive gathers and supplies daily industry trends and news coverage with specific insights for managers and executives, focusing on the major auto companies and parts manufacturers. In addition to detailed auto company trends and profiles, we report on new alliances and partnerships, new models, mergers and acquisitions, labor management, auto unions, investments, and other key issues related to this sector of business.

Cars' Big Weight Gain Hurts Fuel Economy, Study Says

By Jim Motavalli | Jul 28, 2009

If ever there was a perfect illustration of how cars got to be so huge, this is it, and from eco-conscious carmaker Honda! In 20 years, the Honda Accord has not only added 50 percent to its weight, it has also gone on steroids—increasing horsepower by a factor of 2.5.

This is hardly an isolated incident. According to Christopher Knittel of the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Davis (whose work the chart represents), “From 1980 to 2004 the average fuel economy of the US new passenger automobile fleet increased by less than 6.5 percent. During this time, the average horsepower of new passenger cars increased by 80 percent, while the average curb weight increased by 12 percent.”

The author adds that if we just stopped adding so much weight, cars today would be much more fuel efficient. “[I]f weight, horsepower and torque were held at their 1980 levels,” he said, ”fuel economy for both passenger cars and light trucks could have increased by nearly 50 percent from 1980 to 2006; this is in stark contrast to the 15 percent by which fuel economy actually increased.”

Wow, all cars had to do was stop putting on weight. But, as we humans know, slimming down is easier said than done. The Obama Administration recently adopted Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards calling for cars to get 35.5 mpg by 2016, but weight gains are the enemy of that. Knittel adds, “I also find that once technological progress is considered, meeting the CAFE standards adopted in 2007 will require halting the observed increases in weight and engine power characteristics, but little more; in contrast, the standards recently announced by the new administration, while certainly attainable, require non-trivial ‘downsizing.’”

In other words, cars will have to get on a scale. As I wrote here last week, the stripped-down Nissan Versa I’m test-driving (with roll-up windows, no radio, and power nothing) points a way toward a possible car of the future. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction: Adding features and power also inevitably adds weight, and our future cars, either powered by electric motors or smaller gas engines, will need to watch every pound.

First chart from: Knittel, Christopher R. (2009) “Automobiles on Steroids: Product Attribute Trade-Offs and Technological Progress in the Automobile Sector.” Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-09-16. Second chart from U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics.

Jim Motavalli is the author of Forward Drive: The Race to Build Clean Cars for the Future, among other books. He has been covering the environmental side of the auto industry for more than a decade, and writes regularly on those topics for the New York Times.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Behind the Wheel | 2010 Honda Insight: A New Hybrid Sprouts in the Shadow of the Prius

    New York Times - 284 days 1 hour 40 minutes ago

    IN designing the 2010 Insight, Honda's goal was to create a hybrid car that was not just practical, but would be priced within reach of eco-conscious buyers on a budget, providing a greener choice to customers who cannot afford a Civic Hybrid or a Toyota Prius. No longer a tight two-seater, the new Insight has room for five and some cargo. More...

  • Sprint, Samsung launch biodegradable phone

    MSNBC - 110 days 14 hours 13 minutes ago

    NEW YORK - Sprint and Samsung are going to start selling a $50 "eco-conscious" phone with a casing of biodegradable plastic. Several manufacturers have made "green" phones, but they have generally been barebones devices, like the Motorola Renew carried by T-Mobile USA. The new Samsung Reclaim has a slide-out standard-layout keyboard, e-mail and...

  • FD Buyer: What You Need to Know About Packaging and Brands

    RetailWire - 41 days 15 hours 35 minutes ago

    Packaging has more influence on consumer buying decisions than ever. The three eco-R's, Reusable, Refillable, and Recyclable are joined by Less Packaging in making shoppers feel good about buying. To what degree do you see eco-consciousness driving packaging changes versus functional considerations

  • Sprint has fling with Mother Earth, announces eco-friendly Samsung Reclaim

    Boy Genius Report - 110 days 16 hours 21 minutes ago

    Yay green. Sprint announced this morning that it is now the latest carrier to jump on the eco-conscious bandwagon — and being conscious of the environment is definitely a good bandwagon to jump on. Made with 80 percent recycled materials, the Samsung reclaim is a phone that has been rumored to hit Sprint for a while now. Sprint calls the phone...

  • Solar Power For $2 A Day

    Forbes - 267 days 6 hours 9 minutes ago

    BURLINGAME, CALIF.--Imagine a solar panel as affordable as a fancy new bicycle. A panel designed so simply that you can install one (or more) yourself, just outside your windows, in the course of an afternoon. That's the concept behind Oakland, Calif.-based Veranda Solar, a start-up founded last year by Capra J'neva and Emilie Fetscher, recent...

Links from the Web Buzz:
 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    DCDAdvancedTech

    07/30/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Cars' Big Weight Gain Hurts Fuel Economy, Study Says

    Yes, cars gained weight for a number of reasons. Automatic transmissions, power steering, Air conditioning, power brakes, all add weight. But so does the stuff that the governement REQUIRES them to have in cars, like in door crash bars, antilock brakes (which require power brakes I believe), air bags, etc.

    If you want a lighter car you are going to have to sacrifice things, and part of that might be safety and comfort. Of course we can always weld the doors shut and put in a roll cage for safety. That's what NASCAR does and it seems to work fine!

  •  
    2

    gtveloce

    08/04/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Cars' Big Weight Gain Hurts Fuel Economy, Study Says

    It's wrong to compare the Accord's "growth" longitudinally without recognising - as I hope the researchers did - that the 1976 model was in a completely different class of car from the 2009 version. It really is like comparing apples with oranges. These Accords are Accords by name only. Better to compare classes of car and ignore names. The growth in weight is still appreciable. You could reasonably compare a 2009 Civic with a 1976 Accord, for example, and draw more valid conclusions.

    BTW, DCDAdvancedTech is generally correct, but the safety add-ons are not necessarily "required" by "the government". Safety regs vary by country, but generally they require a car to pass impact tests at certain speeds. How they do that is up to the car designers - they could come up with alternatives, but generally don't. (Sometimes regulations do specify ABS or stability control, however.) One of the heaviest safety items, explosive airbags, are a solution devised, developed and promoted by the car companies themselves as an alternative to lighter and possibly safer alternatives. They lobbied for airbags and against better - and lighter - harnesses, for example. Why? Because they believed potential customers would be put off by the thought of harnesses (or helmets, for another example). They (the customers) either wouldn't use 'em - or worse still - would be put off buying cars. The makers are balancing safety against sales here and weight and efficiency is the price paid. Ease of driving, ease of access and maximum comfort with minimum psychological "impact" on the customer's buying thought process is paramount. Heaven forbid we should make it harder to drive a car, or to bring attention to the fact that it is dangerous by making safety features obvious. If we can change that mindset and work creatively on open alternatives to achieve our safety goals, so much the better.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement