advertisement
About Energy Industry

Business in the energy industry is fast paced and ever-changing. BNET Energy provides daily news coverage for managers and executives in the energy sector, with coverage on the major utilities, energy companies, clean tech and renewable energy businesses. BNET Energy offers in depth analysis of green business, the very latest in energy research, alliances and partnerships, competitive intelligence and a host of other global energy industry issues.

Buoyed Optimism at Ocean Power Technologies

By David Phillips | Aug 8, 2008

  • Ocean Power Technology LogoThe Company: Ocean Power Technologies, a renewable energy company specializing in offshore wave power technology
  • The Filing: Form 10-K filed with the SEC on July 14
  • The Finding: Ocean Power is struggling to gain commercial acceptance for its proprietary PowerBuoy wave generation system, which extracts the natural energy in ocean waves, converting it into usable electrical power for utility-scale grid-connected applications. Revenues increased by 89 percent to $4.8 million for fiscal 2008 ended April 30, driven by continued dependence on U.S. Navy research contracts.

The Upshot: The U.S. Navy accounted for 54 percent and 58 percent of sales in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008, respectively.

Chief Executive George Taylor said the company continued to make visible progress during fiscal 2008, increasing its global footprint by partnering with world-class companies. Where Taylor likes to talk about signed agreements — implying commercial adoption of its wave power equipment — the reality is nothing more than feasibility studies to field test the endurance and reliability of its prototype PowerBuoy system.

In July 2006, Ocean Power signed an agreement with the Spanish utility Iberdrola to construct an initial 1.39 megawatt offshore wave park near SantoƱa, on the northern coast of Spain. Two years later, the project is still delayed, mired in a funding quagmire.

Ocean Power’s business strategy depends on demonstrating the commercial viability of its wave power generation station. So it is understandable that the company finally said “uncle” earlier this year, agreeing to limit its first-stage billings to cost, without any markup, and to absorb the first $771,000 of any cost overruns.

Rising cost of fossil fuels, dependence on energy from the Middle East, and global warming — any number of opportunities exist for Ocean Power to sell its wave power stations to utilities. Then again, the company is competing for funding and politicians’ short attention spans against wind, solar, ethanol-and other alternatives to fossil fuels.

In fiscal 2009, the company expects to construct and test the PowerBuoy in projects currently under development in Spain, Southwest England, France, the USA and Australia.

The Question: Can anyone get the chief executive to admit that demonstrating proof-of-concept differs from commercial acceptance?

After more than 25 years as an equity analyst and forensic accounting expert, David Phillips now combs through SEC filings for juicy tidbits. He also blogs regularly at the 10Q Detective.

BNET User Analysis

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    giffboe

    08/09/08 | Report as spam

    This comapany already answered your question

    Read the 10K page 25. http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1378140/000095012308007864/y62968e10vk.htm

    "Wave energy technology is at an early stage of development, and the extent to which wave energy power generation will be commercially viable is uncertain." George Taylor sign it.

    It doesn't seem like the company is misleading anyone, and there is no illusion here in any way.

    The Iberdrola 4okW deployment will be in August 2008. It's not in a "quagmire" as it is progressing. You can see early progress here... http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1378140/000095012308007864/y62968exv10w27.htm
    and pictures in the latest page 19 here http://library.corporate-ir.net/library/15/155/155437/items/298775/EnergyOcean%202008%20Presentation_June%2008-1.pdf

    By comparison, in Indiana, Duke energy has been fighting for years to build a new coal gasification power plant. Now under construction this year to be completed by 2012.

    Plus, OPTT is a public funded company. Today, they have $86 million in working capitol and $12 million in LT investments. To imply competitive government moneys are needed to keep this project alive is false. It is OPTT's advantage and obligation to Shareholders to get as much government money, if any government is willing to grant. To say they have a "Funding quagmire" is a bit deviate, when OPTT could obviously pay for the project.

    Maybe the question should be: Does David Phillips know people that sold short and was he paid by any of these people in any way?

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement