advertisement
About Energy Industry

Business in the energy industry is fast paced and ever-changing. BNET Energy provides daily news coverage for managers and executives in the energy sector, with coverage on the major utilities, energy companies, clean tech and renewable energy businesses. BNET Energy offers in depth analysis of green business, the very latest in energy research, alliances and partnerships, competitive intelligence and a host of other global energy industry issues.

PG&E Pursuing a Grant For Wind Turbine Energy Storage

By Chris Morrison | Aug 27, 2009

Pacific Gas & Electric sure does love to keep up its reputation as the first to try out any new technology. Usually it’s just some form of renewable — wave turbines, space-based solar, and so forth. Today they have a new spin: compressed air storage for wind turbines.

If that conjures the image of turbines filling up a giant balloon, you’re not too far off, although the particular balloon being used isn’t elastic. Compressed air works best with pre-existing caves that have proven to be well sealed, like those that natural gas is sometimes found in. Whenever there’s excess power coming from the turbines, air is pumped into the cave. When power is needed, heat is applied to make the air expand and blow out.

There are already a couple caves being used that way. One in Germany has been operating since the 1970s, and another in Alabama since the early 1990s. But the technology hasn’t gotten too much attention until recently, when some entrepreneurs started working to update it.

Covering the news, the San Jose Mercury points out that the American Wind Energy Association would prefer to skip energy storage for the time being in favor of building cross-country transmission to take wind power where it’s needed.

PG&E doesn’t agree, because it will take time to build the transmission, and many projects are still up in the air. To that, I’d add another objection: The United States doesn’t span enough time zones to make a strong wind at 1am in Ohio or Oklahoma useful anywhere else, especially as we erect ever more turbines. Storage will be useful, if it can be done economically.

Projections have suggested that compressed air might add only a few cents to the price of wind power, which is pretty good considering that the evening wind more or less goes to waste. But PG&E’s project would be the first to nail down a figure. At the moment, they’re saying 300 megawatts of storage in Kern County, California will cost $356 million, requiring an initial $25 million Federal grant for study.

In its blog post on the idea, PG&E didn’t mention who it might work with. But to my knowledge, there’s only one significantly-funded startup pursuing air compression. Energy Storage and Power took about $20 million last year from PSEG Energy Holdings, a subsidiary of the New Jersey utility Public Service Electric and Gas Company. That’s a pretty good bona fide for working with PG&E.

Chris Morrison, a reporter on energy, renewables and climate change, is the former lead cleantech writer for VentureBeat. Follow him on Twitter.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Is there a green fossil fuel?

    ZDNet - 158 days 11 hours 18 minutes ago

    The natural gas interests are interested in the being the first choice fuel in the American future. A report just issued from the Potential Gas Committee sure makes natural gas look like the best potential fuel for generating electricity in coming decades. The U.S. is actually adding to its estimated reserves. Unlike Peak Oil, there seems no...

  • Personal Brand & the Humanization of Corporate Brand

    Global Neighbourhoods - 21 days 14 hours 46 minutes ago

    A great deal is being said these days about personal brand and as is usually the case, with a new term, there is debate on how new or important it is. There are those who feel personal brand is just a new term for good old-fashioned reputation and others who feel there is an opportunity for old advertisers to try a new spin on their creative...

  • Will General Motors Kill Its Electric Car?

    Forbes - 140 days 10 hours 16 minutes ago

    This is about the Chevy Volt. Here's the question: If you have a new automotive technology, where do you put it? In low-volume luxury cars, which allows for experimentation and a higher price? Or should new technology go to big-selling, lower cost cars, where you can try for a bases-loaded home run, excite the mass of buyers and score big before...

  • Will GM Kill Its Electric Car?

    Forbes - 140 days 9 hours 5 minutes ago

    This is about the Chevy Volt. Here's the question: If you have a new automotive technology, where do you put it? In low-volume luxury cars, which allows for experimentation and a higher price? Or should new technology go to big-selling, lower cost cars, where you can try for a bases-loaded home run, excite the mass of buyers and score big before...

  • Silver Spring Networks fills coffers, eyes IPO

    CNET News - 249 days 16 hours 13 minutes ago

    NEW YORK--Smart-grid upstart Silver Spring Networks closed a round of funding on March 1, which the company hopes will be its last before going public, according to president and CEO Scott Lang.Silver Spring Networks raised an additional 20 percent to the $75 million it secured last year, or another $15 million, Lang said during a presentation...

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    exaviator

    08/31/09 | Report as spam

    RE: PG&E Pursuing a Grant For Wind Turbine Energy Storage

    Interesting -- I remember reading about this back in the late '70's / early 80's. The reasons you mention above (transmission distance and asynchoronous peaking) have not changed. But back then there was far more infrastructure envisioned (air storage tanks, etc.), and the cost was simply out of sight.

    I wonder if air cleanliness and humidity in the ground would be factors. Certainly either one would require removal before using in any energy extraction device.

    Back during the days of disco and crappy cars, the community was also looking at pumping water "uphill" as a method of energy storage, as well as batteries, of course. I would think that either one of those would be a much higher energy conversion efficiency compared to air (but with substantial attendant capital costs).

    In either case, you hit it on the head with this observation: "The United States doesn?t span enough time zones to make a strong wind at 1am in Ohio or Oklahoma useful anywhere else, especially as we erect ever more turbines."

    If they can't do practical storage, wind is forever a subsidized government hobby.

  •  
    2

    Chris Morrison

    08/31/09 | Report as spam

    RE: PG&E Pursuing a Grant For Wind Turbine Energy Storage

    Thanks Exav -- I keep hearing that water reservoirs are still on the table, although I can't tell you about any specific projects, probably because they require a certain geography and a lot of space.

    Air storage, on the other hand, actually adds emissions to wind power. As I understand, the air isn't just pressurized enough to blow out on its own. It's actually heated by burning natural gas. So you lose some energy as you compress the air into the cavern, lose more on heating it, and something over 50 percent of what you stored back.

    But as long as the caves are naturally occurring, they may be able to figure out a way to make 'em cost effective, anyway.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement