advertisement
About Energy Industry

Business in the energy industry is fast paced and ever-changing. BNET Energy provides daily news coverage for managers and executives in the energy sector, with coverage on the major utilities, energy companies, clean tech and renewable energy businesses. BNET Energy offers in depth analysis of green business, the very latest in energy research, alliances and partnerships, competitive intelligence and a host of other global energy industry issues.

Nukes, Coal and the National Security Argument

By Kirsten Korosec | Sep 10, 2009

When the standard let’s-save-the-environment argument failed to motivate Congress members to pick up the climate change legislation flag, advocates turned to the economy and job creation.

Now a bipartisan group of former Congressmen and U.S. foreign policy leaders — with resumes tough to ignore — is pushing climate change legislation as a national security issue.

The Partnership for a Secure America took out an ad in Politico this week declaring its national security message. The group, started in 2005 by former Congressmen Lee Hamilton, D-IN, and Warren Rudman, R-NH, boasts an impressive advisory board that includes former secretary of state Warren Christopher, former secretary of defense William Perry and former national security advisor Robert McFarlane.

Their message? The U.S. must lead the charge to combat climate change by crafting a bipartisan plan to help avoid humanitarian disasters and political instability that could threaten the security of the nation and its allies.

But what will it take to get the Senate — or at least 60 Senators needed for cloture — to pass such legislation?

Sen. Joe Lieberman, I- Conn., laid it out during the PSA’s climate change event this week. The bill needs more support for nuclear energy, clean coal and subsidies for consumers, especially those living in states heavily reliant on coal to produce electricity.


 

“This issue divides not only along partisan lines, but regional lines and state lines depending on economics and probably the number one concern is about coal,” Lieberman said during the PSA event.

Lieberman pointed to Indiana, which receives 95 percent of its electricity from burning coal, and predicted senators there would not vote for a bill if they think it will push energy costs up significantly.

The House version, which passed earlier this summer, already provides a number of free allowances or credits to the coal industry in an effort to lower the cost of reducing its emissions. But Lieberman and several other senators are pushing for more revenue generated under the cap-and-trade plan to go towards clean coal technology, particularly capturing carbon and sequestration.

Lieberman’s focus these days is on those middle-of-the-road senators. The ones which haven’t come out for or against climate change legislation.

It’s hard to believe there are still senators out there that don’t have strong opinions about climate change legislation. And if there are, what level of concessions and consumer protection need to be added to the bill to get their support?

Kirsten Korosec has been a print and online journalist for more than 10 years covering education, politics and business.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Big Cut: U.S. Companies Give Washington Their Climate-Policy Wish List

    Wall Street Journal - 307 days 11 hours 44 minutes ago

    Even if the U.S. Congress is unsure just when it will get around to tackling climate change, U.S. corporations are sure legislation is coming?and are desperate to make sure they have a big say in what shape climate-change legislation eventually takes. The U.S. Climate Action Partnership, a group of big companies and environmental groups, will...

  • Duke Leaves Coal Group Over Anti-Climate Bill Stance

    GreenBiz.com - 81 days 17 hours 36 minutes ago

    Citing a rift with other member companies hostile to U.S. climate change legislation, Duke Energy left the the American Coalition for Clean Coal Energy, a business coalition linked to a recent scandal over forged letters sent to members of Congress opposing the Waxman-Markey climate bill

  • Advanced Biofuels - Increasing Domestic Economic Growth and Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions

    Biofuels & Climate Change - 210 days 7 hours 18 minutes ago

    Last week the Members of the Energy and Commerce Swcolumn"> One of the panels testifying at the hearing was titled “Green Jobs and Economic Benefits” on Wednesday, April 22 and included testimony from the American Wind Energy Association, Blue Green Alliance, the Union of Concerned Scientists, the Environmental Defense Fund and the Stockholm...

  • Does the U.S. Chamber Speak for Big Business?

    BusinessWeek - 47 days 4 hours 53 minutes ago

    By Jane Sasseen There aren't many who would willingly take on Apple (AAPL) icon Steve Jobs—and lecture him on technology. But Thomas J. Donohue, the combative head of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, isn't one to step away from a fight. So on Oct. 6, a day after Apple became the fifth—and most prominent—company to resign or reduce its role...

  • Week in Oil & Gas: Punting in Copenhagen and Gulf of Mexico Leases -- Abridged

    BNET Energy - 7 days 8 hours 6 minutes ago

    The odds Congress would be able to pass climate-change legislation this year dimmed by the minute last week, as the political wrangling moved to

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Galileo2100

    09/11/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Nukes, Coal and the National Security Argument

    Space-Based Solar Power has been the solution waiting for the problem. 99% of the mass of solar power satellites can be built from lunar materials with a 97% cost savings vs. earth-launched materials (these numbers are from a 1980s study by the Space Studies Institute). NASA awaits a new space directive. DOE throws stimulus money at bandaid local and regional schemes. DOD wants secure energy delivery to forward bases. Congress wants to do something that will get them re-elected. We all want a secure bisophere. Do SBSP and stop beating around the bush!

  •  
    2

    Galileo2100

    09/12/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Nukes, Coal and the National Security Argument

    A US-led SBSP program provides the breakout path and the industrial rationale for human settlement of space. It puts private enterprise and partner nations to work on a common goal. It replaces the fossil fuel economy as those supplies ramp down over the course of this century. It accesses the sun 24/7. The sun is the permanent central fusion reactor that transmits to the earth 10,000 times the amount of energy being consumed in all forms. Most of that potential is wasted now due to atmospheric reflection along with local issues like day/night cycles, latitude, and weather.

    The moon presents to us one face at all times, a fortunate gift of circumstances for the placement of mining machinery which can be teleoperated from here with only a short time delay. Lunar regolith is rich in the constituent elements needed for building large structures. The moon is a cost-saver by 97% as compared to earth-launched materials because its 1/6 gravity allows for the simple propulsion of lunar soil by electromagnetic means rather than by expensive chemical rockets. Electromagnetic mass drivers, prototypes of which were built and successfully tested by the Space Studies Institute, can operate on solar-fed motors or by other cheap means. Such mass drivers can also be adapted to manipulate NEOs (asteroids) into a parking orbit for processing.

    The cis-lunar infrastructure can build not only sunsats for the benefit of the earth, but also shielded 1-g free-space habitats for workers and shielded 1-g interplanetary ships of exploration.
    Such ships can carry many people to the Mars system and to other destinations throughout the solar plane. They can travel by propulsion beamed from sunsats and enter into parking orbit around a target system for a period of years, where the crew can do science and reconnaissance by probes, robots, and humans.

    SBSP, introduced in the US over 40 years ago by Peter Glaser of AD Little Corp., has been favorably reviewed by NASA, DOE, and DOD. The program can provide large potential civil energy benefits. DOD finds important national security benefits in a 2007 study by the National Security Space Office. DOD can save big money and still pay over-market prices for secure delivery of energy to its fighters in forward locations. DOD can be a steady anchor customer for SBSP, as it has been for other industries. NSSO sees another benefit: SBSP can possibly help mitigate future energy wars due to dwindling undergound supplies in unfriendly territory.

    SBSP is being pursued by Japan, whether we participate or lead or not. JAXA and its partners are investing $21B in their first sunsat program to provide continuous base load power to Tokyo homes and businesses.

    SBSP is the patient game-changer which the federal government, investors, partner nations, and the rest of us can fully weigh as we decide what our future will look like. Fear is easy, but we don't have to resort to it. In a single action, we can choose to tap into all of the clean energy that we will need for our cities and transportation from a known quantity that has an estimated 4-billion year reliability, we can protect the biosphere and end climate change (at least as an issue), and we can start thinking about homesteading our solar plane in habitats that will support swing sets and intramural football, while taking advantage of the resources that await us off the surface of the earth.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement