advertisement
About Energy Industry

Business in the energy industry is fast paced and ever-changing. BNET Energy provides daily news coverage for managers and executives in the energy sector, with coverage on the major utilities, energy companies, clean tech and renewable energy businesses. BNET Energy offers in depth analysis of green business, the very latest in energy research, alliances and partnerships, competitive intelligence and a host of other global energy industry issues.

Pickens Plan: Good for T. Boone or U.S.?

By David Phillips | Aug 29, 2008

  • Clean Energy Fuels LogoThe Company: Clean Energy Fuels, the largest provider of compressed and liquefied natural gas for alternative-fuel vehicles in North America.
  • The Filing: DEF 14-A filed with the SEC on April 15, 2008.
  • The Finding: It’s an addiction that threatens our economy, our environment and our national security — oil. In a four-minute video and legends of commercials on television, Boone Pickens, the legendary oil tycoon, says the U.S. can reduce dependence on foreign crude by harnessing domestic energy alternatives, such as wind and natural gas.

The Upshot: The Pickens Plan alleges that by building new wind generation facilities and tapping huge stores of domestic natural gas, the country can replace more than one-third of our foreign oil imports in 10 years.

“Independence” rhetoric aside, what troubles me in the energy debate is Picken’s lack of transparency. In addition to sinking millions of his own money on a 4,000-megawatt wind farm in Texas, he owns about 61 percent of the common stock of Clean Energy Fuels, the largest provider of natural gas in North America for transportation (which I positively commented about in this blog back on June 23).

The Question: Is the Pickens Plan motivated by self-interest or a sincere effort to both make money and do well by the country. What do you think?

David Phillips has more than 25 years experience on Wall Street, first as a financial consultant and then as an equity analyst for several investment banking firms. His work has been cited as "Must-Read" by Kiplinger's Personal Finance, Washington Post (May 2009), and by BusinessWeek.

BNET User Analysis

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    AaronBerndt

    08/30/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Pickens Plan: Good for T. Boone or U.S.?

    High oil/gas prices have given the renewable energy industry a gift, the ability to be a cost effective solution to our oil addiction. Soon we will not be required to talk about clean energy companies as though they were just charities for the environment. The industry will become self sustaining and allow entrepreneurs to build money making companies. Of course Pickens is in it for the money. The renewable energy sector just happens to come attached with many benefits for society.

  •  
    2

    savvy investor

    08/30/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Pickens Plan: Good for T. Boone or U.S.?

    "charities for the envrironment." great euphamism. Hopefully, one day, fossil fuels will become just that again -- fossils!

  •  
    3

    davoca

    08/31/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Pickens Plan: Good for T. Boone or U.S.?

    What's the nature of the man? Perhaps his offering is no different than ours when we offer food and clothing to those in need but not to share the roof over our heads. It is natural to suspect his offer as self-serving, expecting he would receive profits as a result from Clean Energy. If someone is willing to share half of a pie they bought or cooked on their own, are we going to fault them for eating the other half?

  •  
    4

    bobs1130

    09/01/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Pickens Plan: Good for T. Boone or U.S.?

    I know it is bad for OPEC and big oil. That is good enough for me. Let's not turn this into another lost opportunity by thinking it to death, the time is now before the oil companies have time to put a negative spin on it.

  •  
    5

    fhkchen

    09/01/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Pickens Plan: Good for T. Boone or U.S.?

    If we think win-win, then it'll be a win for T. Boone but more importantly, also a win for the U.S. So, what's wrong with that? The best ideas are never ones that make one side win and one side lose but does the idea really make sense for every one involved.

  •  
    6

    danawk

    09/02/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Pickens Plan: Good for T. Boone or U.S.?

    Anything we can do to get big oil to look at alternatives to middle eastern oil is good for America (whether you are democrat or republican). Obviously, he wants to profit off of his vision, but he will not be the only one who profits.

  •  
    7

    savvy investor

    09/02/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Pickens Plan: Good for T. Boone or U.S.?

    Does anyone think that with the price of oil falling back towards $100 -- rhetoric aside -- Congress and the American public will feel less of a sense of urgency to "go green?"

  •  
    8

    Michael.Mattis@...

    09/03/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Pickens Plan: Good for T. Boone or U.S.?

    You know what? If T. Boone Pickens -- or anyone else, for that matter -- can help significantly reduce our dependence on foreign oil, I sincerely hope he does make billions.

    Because it's that serious.

  •  
    9

    Energy Independence

    09/05/08 | Report as spam

    The problem with T-Bone's plan...

    Right now I work in utility scale renewables and as a result have a lot of exposure to the general utility industry. So I've learned a thing or two about this...

    First let me say that I agree 100% that it's economic suicide to import $700 billion in oil every year. This transfer of wealth is a disaster from every angle.

    Second, while I agree that wind can and should play a major role, I disagree with the idea of converting our cars to natural gas. T-bone suggest that we can take the natural gas we're using for energy production and start using it for cars. The glaring problem with this is that the gas plants that are already built have cost billions each... and have power purchase contracts to ensure that such debt can be repaid to investors.

    So if we all went out and converted our cars to natural gas do you think the natural gas plants would just shut their doors? Maybe... if natural soared as a result and they couldn't produce power within the economic constructs of their contracts. Wouldn't T-bone love that?

    So yes... I think half his plan is fundamentally flawed by his own self-interest. But in terms of harnessing wind in the mid-west I couldn't agree more.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement