advertisement
About Energy Industry

Business in the energy industry is fast paced and ever-changing. BNET Energy provides daily news coverage for managers and executives in the energy sector, with coverage on the major utilities, energy companies, clean tech and renewable energy businesses. BNET Energy offers in depth analysis of green business, the very latest in energy research, alliances and partnerships, competitive intelligence and a host of other global energy industry issues.

Cow Burps OK: House, Senate Block EPA From Regulating Livestock Emissions

By Kirsten Korosec | Oct 28, 2009

Farmers can breath a little easier now — cows can burp and fart without fear of the Environmental Protection Agency regulating their methane emissions.

You may remember the “cow tax” rumors that floated around late last year and caused an uproar among farmers and ranchers worried the EPA planned to regulate methane gas emitted from livestock.

The EPA has said — repeatedly — it has no plans to impose a cow tax. But the idea was still worrisome for ranchers and farmers.

House and Senate conferees made it official Tuesday and approved an amendment to block agency efforts to require Clean Air Act permits for greenhouse gases emitted by livestock, according to reports from Greenwire and Scientific American.

Under the amendment, the EPA can not use funds to implement rules requiring livestock producers to obtain Clean Air Act operating permits for the biological emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases, according to the Scientific American report.

The amendment was just a small part of a $32.2 billion conference package to fund the EPA, Interior Department and the Forest Service for fiscal 2010. Both chambers had already adopted similar amendments to their versions of the bill.

The EPA’s spending plan for fiscal 2010 — approved by the conferees — provides $10.3 billion in funding, a 36 percent increase from last year.

Talk of taxes on flatulence was late night fodder for weeks. But jokes aside, it does boil down to a deeper issue of who should be regulating emissions: Congress or the EPA?

A U.S. Supreme Court decision two years ago in Massachusetts v. EPA requires the government agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act.

The agency is now in the process of tweaking some of its permitting rules in response to the Supreme court ruling. Under its proposed rules, the EPA raises the permitting threshold established by the Clean Air Act from 250 per tons year to at least 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide per year.

The country’s largest emitters of six greenhouse gas gases — those above that 25,000 ton-level — will be required to report their annual emissions.

The rule would impact about 14,000 coal-burning power plants, factories and refineries. About 107 large-scale U.S.  farms produce enough greenhouse gas emissions to fall under the proposed rules, the EPA has said.

Kirsten Korosec has been a print and online journalist for more than 10 years covering education, politics and business.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Low-gas cattle feed

    The Engineer - 271 days 8 hours 56 minutes ago

    null null null null null null null null null null

  • Food Fight: Big Beef Challenges EPA Climate Change Finding

    BNET Energy - 36 days 5 hours 54 minutes ago

    Big beef is worried about methane. Namely, the regulation of it by the Environmental Protection Agency, which determined last month in an official

  • U.S. Climate Legislation Won't Regulate Cow Burps

    GreenBiz.com - 232 days 5 hours 51 minutes ago

    Burps from cows and other farm animals won't be regulated under proposed greenhouse gas legislation being looked at by the U.S. Congress.Although the Environmental Protection Agency wasn't planning to regulate cow burps in the first place, worries over the far-off possibility of a "cow tax" prompted the exclusion of a specific gas from the...

  • U.S. to Capture Cow Farts to Save the Planet

    DailyFinance - 55 days 16 minutes ago

    In the future, America will harness cow farts to curb pollution and power the grid. What? It sounds like a joke, but it's actually a real promise. By 2020, dairy industry emissions will be reduced by 25%, largely by persuading dairy farmers to capture methane gas, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced at the Copenhagen climate...

  • Algae Diet Could Cut Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cows

    Green Options - 40 days 12 hours 35 minutes ago

    Cow farts are emerging as a major source of the greenhouse gas methane, but scientists in Australia may be on to a simple way to nip that in the bud. Preliminary studies are showing that feeding “algae cakes” to cows results in a significant reduction in their methane emissions. As reported in The Australian, a team of researchers at James...

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    stoidiu

    10/29/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Cow Burps OK: House, Senate Block EPA From Regulating Livestock Emissions

    This is the problem with our courts. A few scavenger lawyers can make a living for themselves & so called "clients" by filing nuisance lawsuits. Neither these plaintiffs nor their attorneys give a hoot about global warming. It's just the next meal ticket. Perhaps they should sue themselves as co-defendants for the damages they have inflicted upon themselves & our planet by their past & ongoing consumption of energy derived from fossil fuels.

    For all who believe this is a good thing, we assume your computers are powered by energy from wind, solar, or perhaps gas captured from your flatulence (since you are obviously full of it). And you attorneys surely ride your bicycles down to the courthouse to file nuisance lawsuits printed on re-cycled paper.

    By the way, for all you Al Gore minions out there, word is a that a solution is near for the methane problem caused by cattle. It appears that makers of Gas-ridx will soon introduce Bovine Gas-ridx to reduce cow farts. A side benefit is that meat eaters will no longer produce excess methane due to their digestion of beef.

    On this news plaintiffs attorneys in the Ignorance is Bliss v. Human Carnivores litigation decided to drop a series of class action suits against meat eaters in which the vegetarian plaintiffs sought to secure damages in the form of "lots of money" for pain and suffering rendered unto them by meat eaters through their excess expulsion of unpleasant and noxious gaseous matter. Further the claimants had sought to draw a direct link to digestion of beef as the source of the excess gaseous matter.

    In addition the claimants sought to prove that this gas and that expelled by the animals themselves could be directly linked to global warming. Named as co-defendants in the case are cattle farmers, feed manufacturers, veterinarians, and animal husbandry consultants for their willful and negligent disregard for the harmful impact of this animal on our planet.

    In an interesting turn of events, the claimants have filed suit against the U.S. government to require mammalian Gas-X to be placed in feeders throughout our National Parks / Forests to reduce the harmful impact that wildlife has on our planet by farting. Victims of Katrina from the Comer v. Murphy Oil case are encouraged to contact the plaintiff's attorneys at Shyster, Wordsmith, and Shark - Criminals at Law.

    The absurdity of it all makes me want to belch.

  •  
    2

    mrloan

    10/29/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Cow Burps OK: House, Senate Block EPA From Regulating Livestock Emissions

    Taxing Cow Flatulence? That's absurd! Mr. Loan

  •  
    3

    ArtM72

    11/02/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Cow Burps OK: House, Senate Block EPA From Regulating Livestock Emissions

    Say what you will, it is a fact that pound for pound methane is 23 times more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas and methane formation is fundamental to digestion by ruminants such as cattle. It is possible significant quantities of methane are produced by cattle.

    For my way of thinking, fart jokes can be funny, but let science guide whatever decision is to be made. Not that there isn't trouble with that approach given 40% of Americans don't believe in evolution and 20% don't know the difference between that and creationism. Very sad to see America's drift back to the Dark Ages.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement