BNET Industries

BNET Energy

Industry news and insights by Chris Morrison

InterOil Readies Antelope-1 Site for Drilling

By David Phillips | October 13th, 2008 @ 7:57 am

  • InterOil Corporation LogoThe Company: InterOil Corporation, a Canadian energy company with operations in Papua New Guinea.
  • The Filing: FORM 6-K filed with the SEC on August 13, 2008.
  • The Finding: InterOil said the Antelope-1 rig site location is complete and drilling will commence in the next few days, targeting a limestone reef porosity zone intersecting in the Elk-4, a well that yielded a gas flow rate of 105 million standard cubic feet and approximately 2,000 barrels of condensate per day in a previous test, a record-high gas flow rate for Papua New Guinea. Discovery of a second well that confirms commercial gas reserves is critical to a proposed liquefied natural gas project in Papua New Guinea with the government.

The Upshot: InterOil is a shareholder in a joint venture established to construct Papua New Guinea’s first liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant on a site adjacent to the company’s refinery in Port Moresby. The LNG plant is predicated on at least a substantial portion of the gas being supplied to it from InterOil’s Elk/Antelope complex, with construction of the plant and pipeline linking the plant to Elk/Antelope. One well, however, does not make for a reliable estimate of larger field reserves. Work on two prior well sites, Elk-1 drilled in 2006 and Elk-2 spudded in 2007, was suspended due to limited gas flow rates.

At June 30, 2008, InterOil did not have any oil or gas reserves or resources, or working interests in any producing oil and gas wells and therefore did not record oil and gas sales revenue during the first-half 2008. The Elk-4 structure hydrocarbons are being evaluated and are not currently classified as proven or probable reserves or resources under definitions adopted by the United States or Canadian regulatory authorities.

To date, income and cash flow are derived almost totally from midstream refinery activities, comprised of a 32,500 barrel per day crude distillation facility producing diesel, jet fuel and gasoline for the domestic Papua New Guinea market.

In the event that the viability of the LNG project is established, the company will be required to raise “substantial amounts” of financing for the Elk field development and delivery of gas to the LNG project. Preparatory costs, exploratory drilling, and appraisal testing capital expenditures totaled $29.1 million for the first six-months 2008.

In addition, under an indirect participation agreement entered into in February 2005, InterOil is obliged to spend up to $125 million to drill a minimum of eight exploration wells. As of June 30, management estimated that a further $46.4 million was required to drill an additional four wells (to fulfill this commitment).

The balance sheet at June 30, 2008, reflects a company barely getting by. Cash used by operating activities was $25.7 million in the first half 2008. Long-term debt is 1.2 times stockholder equity (and the company can barely cover the interest on its long-term debt with operating profits). InterOil did, however, file a shelf prospectus in July that should enable the company to access, from time to time, up to $200 million in debt and/or equity financing.

The Question(s): Will Antelope-1 yield proof of sufficient gas reserves to guarantee the LNG project? Given illiquid credit conditions, will InterOil be able to secure additional capital when needed?

Tags: test, Reserve, InterOil, Liquefied Natural Ga, Investment, Balance Sheets, Financial Accounting, Government, Financial Services, Finance

After more than 25 years as an equity analyst and forensic accounting expert, David Phillips now combs through SEC filings for juicy tidbits. He also blogs regularly at the 10Q Detective.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

     
  • 1

    hans101

    10/13/08 | Report as spam

    RE: InterOil Readies Antelope-1 Site for Drilling

    Many omissions here.
    1) Elk1 limited flow rates?? It had the same flow rates as the record flowing Elk4.
    2) There is an independent resource estimation coming out within weeks. Their own estimates are between 8-12Tcf
    3) Just those two record flowing wells, Elk1&4 together can supply 40% of the gas needed for an LNG facility already. Compare that to coal seam gas projects in Australia, where they have to drill, treat, and man thousands (20,000 as in the case of Conoco/Origin), with labour cost at a multiple compared to where IOC is (Papua New Guinea)
    4) Refinery has turned around
    5) They're not looking at the credit markets, they're looking for partners and many are interested. LNG is still very hot in Asia, and first supplies in 2014, the present mess will be history.

    For more on IOC see:http://shareholdersunite.com

  •  
  • 2

    10Q_Detective

    10/16/08 | Report as spam

    RE: InterOil Readies Antelope-1 Site for Drilling

    #1. "No major activity occurred at the Elk-1 or Elk-2 well sites during the second quarter of 2008. The Elk-1 well drilled in 2006, has been suspended as a gas/condensate discovery." Direct from corporate 6-K filing.
    #2. re: "There is an independent resource estimation coming out within weeks." I am not a mind reader. It would be difficult to base my story on supposed estimates coming out AT SOME FUTURE DATE.
    #3. Agree with your third point --assuming a SECOND commercial discovery is found.
    #5. "They're not looking at the credit markets, they're looking for partners and many are interested" Point one contradicts company Registration Filings; Point 2 -- again, based on conjecture.
    Thank you for your interest & comments

  •  
  • 3

    hans101

    10/22/08 | Report as spam

    RE: InterOil Readies Antelope-1 Site for Drilling

    Elk1 had comparable flow rates to Elk4 (in a test run for a week, with no decrease of pressure whatsoever). Does it matter that this was two years ago? No, not at all. What do you suggest they do with Elk1? They do not have an LNG facility to supply gas yet, so the only thing they can do is suspend operations, unless you have some kind of brilliant suggestion.

    The fact that they have no present use for it doesn't detract in the slightest that Elk1 is as big a well as Elk4. SO THEY ALREADY HAVE A SECOND COMMERCIAL DISCOVERY. Why call Elk4 a commercial discovery and Elk1 not, just because one has been drilled before the other? It's nonsense.

    Elk4 has no been suspended, does that mean it's not a commercial find anymore? Of course not.

The following tags are supported in BNET comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. You are currently a guest | Login?
advertisement
Go
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
AboutEnergy Industry

BNET Energy provides daily news coverage for managers and executives in the energy industry, with coverage on major utilities, oil companies, and clean tech and renewable energy businesses. BNET Energy offers analysis on deal flow, new technology, alliances and partnerships, competitive intelligence, and a host of other critical business issues.