advertisement
About Energy Industry

Business in the energy industry is fast paced and ever-changing. BNET Energy provides daily news coverage for managers and executives in the energy sector, with coverage on the major utilities, energy companies, clean tech and renewable energy businesses. BNET Energy offers in depth analysis of green business, the very latest in energy research, alliances and partnerships, competitive intelligence and a host of other global energy industry issues.

Capitol Power Plant Protests Heighten Danger for Coal

By Chris Morrison | Feb 28, 2009

What do Washington, D.C.’s Capitol Power Plant, an E.ON plant in Kingsnorth, England and a mine in Konin, Poland have in common? Two things: The first is coal, and the second is a problem with protesters.

Coal companies and investors have long known lower profit margins lay ahead due to carbon regulations and more difficulty in getting plants permitted. But one wonders if they foresaw an increasingly effective public campaign against their resource.

The Capitol Power Plant is getting attention right now because a protest that hasn’t even happened yet appears to have spurred politicians to action. Run by the Architect of the Capitol to heat nearby government buildings in D.C., the plant is aging and inefficient. Yet meddling by congressmen from coal-mining states has allegedly kept the plant burning a fuel mix including coal, rather than switching over to pure natural gas, which would be cleaner.

A relatively small protest scheduled for this Monday — at one point it was touting 2,500 sign-ups — was organized to try to force the plant to make the switch. Yet the two ranking senate Democrats, senators Pelosi and Reid, have pre-empted the protestors by asking the Architect to get rid of the coal.

The cynic in me says the senators, like any good politicians, are seeking to turn the attention to themselves. But in the process, they’ve also brought far more attention to the event itself, which is still set to happen, and will now get more national coverage when it does.

For some, it will be the first time seeing significant protests against coal. Yet there was already a rising tide of the same. At Kingsnorth, activists have been heckling plant owners and workers for months. At Drax, another English plant, they went much further, hijacking an entire coal train. The Polish protests were led by Greenpeace, an organization that exists to make a nuisance of itself and as such is sometimes ineffective, but seems to be increasingly zeroing in on coal. Other actions have happened in the United States, China and Australia.

Notably, many would be occurring even without groups like Greenpeace. There is a grassroots movement, and every day it bears more resemblance to the decades-ago backlash against nuclear power, one of the two major factors that led to the end of the use of that fuel in many countries (the other being higher cost).

Nuclear, it should be noted, never had a hundred percent of the people against it. What it did have was an extremely dedicated core of opposition — people who did not want nuclear power, come hell or high water. Those outspoken opponents overwhelmed nuclear’s supporters. Soon, that may be the case with coal.

The video made to entice people to the Capitol protest, made by Dr. James Hansen, a NASA scientist who has long been at the forefront of the climate debate, is below.

Chris Morrison, a reporter on energy, renewables and climate change, is the former lead cleantech writer for VentureBeat. Follow him on Twitter.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • E.ON shelves Kingsnorth plans

    The Engineer - 47 days 15 hours 22 minutes ago

    null null null null null null null null null null

  • E.On delays new coal-fired plant

    BBC - 48 days 3 hours 19 minutes ago

    Controversial plans to build a new coal-fired power station at Kingsnorth in Kent have been put on hold for up to three years, energy firm E.On has said. It said the scheme would be delayed to about 2016 because electricity demand had fallen during the global recession. The site has been a high-profile target of environmental protests by groups...

  • Where there's hope there's fire

    ZDNet - 266 days 19 hours 49 minutes ago

    Now that the federal government no longer officially doubts global warming, the proponents of action to curtail climate change have takent to the streets. In Washington D.C. today several thousand fired-up protestors marched on the coal-burning plant that helps keep the Congress warm or cool in season. The protest was to demand less coal-burning...

  • Kingsnorth joins UK carbon capture competition

    New Energy Focus - 14 days 15 hours 54 minutes ago

    E.ON confirms Kingsnorth is entered for the next stage of the Government's competition to develop a commercial-scale CCS plant as Tilbury withdraws

  • E.ON and Siemens plan CCS plant

    Strategy Eye - 278 days 4 hours 18 minutes ago

    E.ON Kraftwerke is partnering with Siemens to develop a pilot carbon capture and storage (CCS) facility at E.ON's coal-fired power plant in Grosskrotzenburg, Germany. The technology will be employed at Unit 5 of its Staudinger plant, which has a capacity of 510MW. The pilot facility is expected to begin operations later this year. Siemens'...

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    motoradical

    03/01/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Capitol Power Plant Protests Heighten Danger for Coal

    Too bad people don't realize that killing coal-based generation will only raise the cost of energy in the U.S. without changing global climate. If all the coal plants in the U.S. were turned off immediately, the impact on global anthropogenic CO2 emissions would be only a 6% reduction - hardly what I'd call "saving the planet". And yet, Obama's budget calls for the creation of a cap-and-trade program by 2012 that will generate $85 billion per year in federal revenue from electric ratepayers - that's you and me! In the midwest, this will add $20 per month to your electric bill and make no measurable change in the earth's climate. We need to ask Jim Hansen to tell us how much the climate will change if his suggestions are followed. According to the IPCC, the difference after 100 years, if every nation on earth adopted a CO2 cap, could be as little as 1 degree C! Don't we have more important problems to spend money on?

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement