advertisement
About Energy Industry

Business in the energy industry is fast paced and ever-changing. BNET Energy provides daily news coverage for managers and executives in the energy sector, with coverage on the major utilities, energy companies, clean tech and renewable energy businesses. BNET Energy offers in depth analysis of green business, the very latest in energy research, alliances and partnerships, competitive intelligence and a host of other global energy industry issues.

The Perfect Storm for Decreasing Oil Consumption

By Chris Morrison | Mar 3, 2009

A favorite theme of some oil pundits today is that following the low demand of the recession, the United States will suffer through a painful price crunch. Oil companies, they say, will need years to build their production back up, while demand for transportation fuel, the end use for 70 percent of our oil according to theEIA, will recover far more quickly.

The first point is certainly true; oil is not a tap that is turned on and off, and investment in new production has suffered in the recession. But is the conventional wisdom that consumption of gas and diesel fuel will quickly pop back up after the recession true?

Without trying to directly answer that question, I’ve put together a list of factors that may mean oil demand won’t resume as quickly as expected in the United States, post-recession. They fit into two groupings: The first for trends that seem certain, and the second for changes that might happen. The list is long, but that’s the point.

Trends underway (or nearly certain)

  • Ongoing lower income levels due to the recession; each 1 percent decline in income translates to 0.5 percent lower gas consumption
  • Carbon cap and trade, which will effectively act as a gas tax, lowering demand
  • Rising vehicle prices due to adoption of hybrids and tightening efficiency requirements (again, higher prices for anything related to driving means less driving)
  • Increased biofuel production (ethanol internally, and biodiesel from overseas)
  • Increases in fuel efficiency (likely exceeding the significant gains of past years, especially with hybrids entering the mix)
  • Adoption of of plug-in electrics vehicles (which aside from barely sipping gas, are best used for shorter distances)
  • Loss of popularity for Hummer (which brandĀ General Motors isĀ considering selling) and other large vehicles
  • A new emphasis on bicycling and walking for health and environmental reasons
  • Improvement of public transit systems and increased use of same
  • Suburban flight and revitalized inner cities
  • Localization of production (especially for food)
  • More natural gas-fueled transportation in some areas

Changes that may be on the way

  • As-yet undetermined taxes aimed at improving road quality, which will have the same demand-destroying effect as gas taxes
  • A change from a six- to five-day schedule for the postal service (a major fuel consumer)
  • Budget cutbacks within the military (the single biggest consumer)
  • Finally, if an oil price spike does occur toward the end of the recession, it will tend to further the 2008 spike’s effect of destroying demand

Many of the above are demographic shifts that assume certain behavior trends will continue. The problem with such shifts is that they’re unmeasurable until they’ve happened, so they don’t necessarily enter into economists’ equations. There’s also a distrust that behavior changes due to temporary pricing events will stick, because they didn’t following the 1970s oil price spike; however, there are plenty of reasons to argue that today is a different climate, and social changes are likely to be more permanent.

Did I miss anything that might affect oil consumption for transportation? If so, chime in below, and I’ll add it.

Chris Morrison, a reporter on energy, renewables and climate change, is the former lead cleantech writer for VentureBeat. Follow him on Twitter.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Rise in US inventory cuts oil price

    South China Morning Post - 111 days 1 hour 29 minutes ago

    Oil fell towards US$70 a barrel yesterday after government inventory data showed a build in crude stocks and weak economic data raised doubts about oil demand recovery in the United States

  • Chevron profit declines first time in seven years on weaker energy prices

    South China Morning Post - 207 days 1 hour 29 minutes ago

    Chevron Corp, the second-largest United States oil company, said first-quarter net income declined for the first time in seven years after the global recession slowed fuel demand, spurring a drop in energy prices

  • Oil and gold come under pressure

    South China Morning Post - 139 days 1 hour 29 minutes ago

    Crude oil fell for a sixth day, the longest losing streak since December, and the price of petrol tumbled after a United States government report showed a bigger than expected gain in US fuel supplies as the recession curbed demand

  • Oil prices fall further on economic gloom

    Reuters - 279 days 9 hours 23 minutes ago

    By Richard Valdmanis NEW YORK (Reuters) - Oil prices fell nearly 1 percent to below $35 a barrel on Wednesday as dealers bet that slumping fuel demand in top consumer the United States has forced crude inventories to an 11-year high. U.S. crude for March delivery slipped 31 cents to settle at $34.62 a barrel, while U.S. crude for April delivery...

  • Gas prices: Are they past their peak?

    Consumer Reports - 138 days 9 hours 17 minutes ago

    July is historically a peak travel time in the United States, as gas prices surge in response to the demand, but indications show that prices may have already cooled off this summer. A number of factors contributed to some anxiety over fuel costs this season and brought back memories of the sticker shock from last summer. Drivers saw prices...

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    aviator1zz

    03/04/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The Perfect Storm for Decreasing Oil Consumption

    It will be no different than times before - people are the same yesterday as today. All problems come from the gov't trying to impose itself on the free market.

    I never understood why people think it is progressive to go from 3d lognormally distributed, naturally organic oil/gas (nature's most abundant and most efficient natural resource (hence always lowest price), back to the inefficiency and limits of growing it on an overly distressed 2D terrain surface at the net expense of food and depleted (and much more precious) fresh water aquifers. -back to windmills and scum ponds? Taxpayer subsidize this b/c these lib pointy heads are so smart?? Deforest the amazon to grow sugarcane when Petrobras just found 10Billion (with a B) bbls of oil (plus gas) with one test well offshore? Strip the earth for trace uranium then eternally dispose of toxic waste of nuclear? (okay we need some nuclear for strategic alternatives so we're not held over a barrel but the 'not in my back yard' crowd that gets us over a barrel is causing the very problems they complain about because they DON'T KNOW or understand the natural self correcting phenomenon of 'peak oil' or peak anything. Anything that peaks did so by its own repeatable success - its part of the logistic equation of a fractally chaotic natural feedback system and we're part of that feedback as a subset - not on high managing it, which is as false a liberal ethos (global warming man made/controllable and peak oil) and keynesian economic multipliers of gov't spending results being greater than gov't spending inputs. Why? Because there are no perpetual motion machines and the whole is always (not even equal to) but a little less than the sum of its parts (due to friction). Only the entire relative universe is perpetual. E=mc^2 means 'energy' is a relative thing - all we'll ever do is change it/reorganize it from one state to another by 'consumption' just like every other physical life cycle. When the options model is up, that's it - adapt or die to new fractal boundary opportunities - this is the definition of 'life' and evolution (the self ordering tendency of nature which is driven by the relative disparities and differentials in any system. -ex: where does the 'order' or a hurricane come from? - it self organizes because that's the fastest/most efficient way nature equalizes the relative differential. -when satisfied, back to the self-cancelling, benign, passive, chaotic calm. The ordered state is the 'violent' state where things happen - market corrections, beams snap, wars, explosions, weather, etc. The 'chaotic' state is a passive whirr, noise - people call it just the opposite of what it is and so they miss the point entirely.

  •  
    2

    erm0809

    03/05/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The Perfect Storm for Decreasing Oil Consumption

    Your trends are interesting. Thank you.

    When an organism is not threatened (this is a 6Billion human organism, with a 3000 years evolving experience on survival) trends are good predictors of the future.

    But when it is threatened... dont look at trends. Look at concrete actions. Government by government and corporation by corporation.

    Two approaches - trends or concrete actions. Both dictated by the degree of threat.

    Is our oil supply critically threatened? Are we crossing now the "rubicon"? Unfortunately, only OPEC knows. And its not giving clear consistent pictures in trusted media mediums.

    The perfect storm for oil is not its supply - it is how individual governments and corporations PERCEIVED this supply situation SUBJECTIVELY as manifested in their concrete reactions (e.g. shift to renewables fast, or slow). Why is this so? Because, our economics is founded on growth, growth, growth! And growth needs energy. And these humans, especially this 6Billion generation, now knows how to make a Plan B.

    Therefore, we are near the "Tipping Point". The shouts of the peak oil advocates are getting louder and louder, while the OPEC guys dont have a blog site or Twitter membership as counter-offensive. Their status is elevating to "Mavens" category.

    OPEC has not found a "Guru" to counter the "Mavens".

    It should not be a battle of perception. It should be a battle of technology. Every oil field contains extractable 30% and 60% unextractable due to technology limitations. For the OPEC guys, - if they can invent the technology that removes the extraction limitations - bravo they win half the battle. The other half, is to find a "Guru" (spell Social Media - twitter, facebook, me - hehehe), to evangelize that technology. (


    Combine the two strats and the "renewables" will offer marriage to recover their investments.

    If the OPEC guys lose the technology battle.... well, LONG LIVE THE RENEWABLES!!

    My 5 cents idea, if that technology does exist,
    OPEC should use Social Media to win the perception battle. If that technology (extracting more) doesnt exist, they should jump over the fence fast using still..... Social Media... as their whiteflag bearers.




  •  
    3

    Syfer7812

    03/07/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The Perfect Storm for Decreasing Oil Consumption

    "It will be no different than times before - people are
    the same yesterday as today. All problems come from
    the gov't trying to impose itself on the free market."

    There is no free market. There never was. We have
    global trade which is skewed by massive subsidies by
    the US and UK governments for example. There's
    plenty of political wrangling in the WTO.

    The economic crisis is an example of where truly
    ethical government regulation is absolutely required (if
    such a thing is even possible). Look what unbridled
    greed has done in a market with skewed incentives
    and lack of meaningful regulation.

  •  
    4

    Jim Macklin

    03/11/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The Perfect Storm for Decreasing Oil Consumption

    The list of "trends" is a joke, which one of those is currently in use to any commercial degree or will be used commonly in the next 5 years. Where is the reality and immediacy that would stifle demand tomorrow. Every morning I get up get in my car go to work, on my way I turn on the heat, lights and TV. This is one more example of "Henny Penny Journalism".

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement