About Financial Services Industry

The financial industry meltdown has been the worst since the great depression. BNET Financial provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about the major financial services companies in the banking and finance sector. In addition to detailed company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new mergers, partnerships, financial products, rates, investments, capital, and a host of other critical factors of success in the finance business.

Citigroup Hit With Huge Credit Loss

By Alain Sherter | Oct 15, 2009

Although some news outlets are downplaying Citigroup’s crummy quarterly results this morning, make no mistake — they indicate a banking company in severe distress.

Although Citi reported a net profit of $101 million, down from $4.2 billion in the previous quarter, for common shareholders the company lost $3.2 billion, up from $2.9 billion in the year-ago period. Return on equity was -12.2 percent, down from 14.8 percent in the second quarter and right back were the company was at this time in 2008. Net interest revenue, a measure of how much Citi has to lend when factoring in funding costs, fell 10 percent.

Besides, Citi’s profit largely stems from a deal this summer under which it exchanged preferred stock for common shares. The transaction, which left the federal government (and you know who that means) as the company’s largest shareholder, produced an $851 million one-time gain for the third quarter.

No, the real story here is Citi’s $8 billion in credit losses for the period. That’s down slightly from the previous quarter, but we’re still talking about a crater-sized hole. These losses are mostly walled up in its Citi Holdings unit, which is a little like the attic where crazy uncles get locked away. Including the smell.

Yet there are signs of decay even more widely across the company’s lending lines. Overdue corporate and consumer loans are rising, reaching 5.25 percent of total loans, versus 4.4 percent in the year-ago quarter. Within Citi’s cards division, net credit losses relative to average loans jumped to 9.7 percent, up significantly from 6.5 percent a year ago. Companywide, net credit losses remain high at 5.7 percent, although that’s down a tick from the second quarter.

Fact is, many analysts expect Citigroup’s losses eventually to top 25 percent of its $1 trillion in assets. Gross credit losses in 2009 are running far ahead of last year’s totals, and the company is charging off loans at a much higher rate than its peers. Revenues are up over a year ago, but the question is whether Citi is socking away enough capital to offset rising losses. If not, that will require it to raise more capital.

Citi CEO Vikram Pandit said in a statement accompanying the quarterly results that “sustainable profitability remains our primary goal in the near term.” If by that he means profits unsubsidized by government aid, that’s a long way off.

Alain Sherter is an award-winning business journalist who has written for The Deal and Thomson Financial Media.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Why are BofA and Citi stocks still climbing?

    American Banker - 203 days 15 hours 25 minutes ago

    Bank stocks’ movement ahead of Thursday’s planned release of the Treasury Department’s stress tests results is giving new meaning to the familiar adage, “buy on the rumor; sell on the news.” The financial press this week plunged full force into its speculation on which banks “passed” the government’s test and which did not....

  • Deal nears on aid for Bank of America, reports say

    LA Times - 313 days 3 hours 20 minutes ago

    Investors may finally get some clarity on the fates of Bank of America Corp. and Citigroup Inc. on Friday morning, when both companies will report fourth-quarter earnings. Late Thursday, news reports said Bank of America was in line for at least $15 billion more in government money to bolster the bank’s capital, and that the government would...

  • comScore: Retail eCommerce Sales Flat Year Over Year

    WebProNews - 201 days 15 hours 35 minutes ago

    If any people with ties to eCommerce operations felt a sense of dj vu during the first quarter of this year, it's completely excusable.  As it turns out, the year-over-year change in U.S. sales worked out to zero percent, making the situation pretty similar to the first quarter of 2008. So, is a goose egg good?  Bad?  comScore chairman Gian...

  • Analyst Tells Big Banks to Make Money, Or Else

    Reuters - 230 days 17 hours 3 minutes ago

    NEW YORK (Reuters) - A banking analyst at Oppenheimer & Co said that when big banks proclaim that they are performing well, they better be right. In a report previewing first-quarter results for some of the largest U.S. banks, analyst Chris Kotowski noted how Bank of America Corp (BAC), Citigroup Inc (C), JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM) and Britain's...

  • Government Shouldn't Dictate Bank Behavior

    Seeking Alpha - 314 days 16 hours 32 minutes ago

    Chad Brand submits: With at least a mini Citigroup C break-up plan coming to fruition, there is chatter that the U.S. government has a hand in some of these decisions. The justification is that the TARP program has resulted in the government directly injecting capital into banks like Citigroup

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    RobertClarkRhodes2

    10/16/09 | Report as spam

    That's a good assessment, ideas...

    ...this article is good at stating the obvious (somewhat better than I have seen anywhere else, so thank you), but any ideas on how to right the ship or stick a fork in it?

  •  
    2

    Alain Sherter

    10/18/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Citigroup Hit With Huge Credit Loss

    Well, we're in obvious times, but I take your
    point. I (and others) strongly suspect that Citi is
    headed for a formal restructuring, which is
    probably what should've happened to begin with.

    Happy to hear opposing perspectives, but I see
    little indication that Citi can grow its way out of
    trouble, as these latest results indicate. It's still
    sitting on mountains of toxic debt, without any
    evident market demand for those assets.
    Meanwhile, the ostensibly "good" bank side of the
    business is also struggling.

    Besides, we're already well on the way toward
    receivership, since the federal government
    already owns roughly a third of Citi. Effectively,
    taxpayers are floating this ship, mostly for the
    benefit of bondholders. Unless Citi demonstrates
    that it can turn things around in the next quarter
    or two, there's no reason why the feds shouldn't
    step in.

    And unlike, say, in March, a formal govt takeover
    of Citi is unlikely to scare the debt markets. The
    threat of systemic collapse has passed (for now),
    while there's a tried-and-true process for putting
    big banks into receivership (eg, WaMu,
    Continental Illinois).

    With Citi temporarily under govt control, banking
    regulators can get on with the business of
    flushing out the company's bad assets.
    Shareholders and bondholders mostly get wiped
    out, which has the salutary effect of restoring
    market discipline (ie, eliminating moral hazard).
    After a thorough scrubbing Citi is eventually re-
    privatized.

  •  
    3

    RobertClarkRhodes2

    10/19/09 | Report as spam

    Stick a fork in it (Citi)

    OK, I agree with you in that it is effectively "done". I would argue that instead of trying to fix it, the government should liquidate.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here