About Government Industry

BNET Government provides daily industry trends and global news coverage with insights for managers and executives within the world wide business of government contracting. We analyze new and interesting contract awards, government policy changes, and the trends in procurements and spending. There will also be discussions of the sector with a focus on small and innovative companies and business lines. The world's governments spend billions each year on a variety of hardware and services and the site will discuss how the money is being allocated.

Will The U.S. Follow Europe When It Comes To Defense Spending?

By Matthew Potter | Aug 3, 2009

One of the continuous criticisms of Europe from America has been that the NATO allies and European Union countries don’t pull their own weight in defense spending and capability. The United States spends a great deal more in total and Per Capita then these nations. According to this article at Seeking Alpha by Scott Sacknoff the U.S. was spending $1,756 per person in 2007 compared to the U.K.’s $990, France’s $875 and Italy’s $513. The total spending that year by the U.S. was $528.7 billion and for the Top 5 EU nations only $191.7.

The announced 2010 budget for the Defense Department is probably going to be the peak for U.S. defense spending for a long time. The Obama Administration is looking at keeping it flat and probably reducing it as operations in Iraq and Afghanistan wind down. They have already ended the investment in several major acquisition programs and it is not clear if further cuts are to come. It is true that new programs may be started but they probably will not be new large systems.

Europe like the U.S. has had to alter some of their spending plans in reaction to the world economic downturn and the pressure that has placed on government spending. Not only has revenue been reduced due to the decline in economic activity but money has been channeled to stimulus spending, social programs and other needs. This has caused Europe to look at actually reducing defense spending in the short term especially for investment in new systems.

England especially which along with Canada and Australia has been the largest contributor to operations in Afghanistan has discussed a major review of defense spending that may see the end of several major new acquisitions. There has been talk of not buying the A400M transport and the latest batch of Typhoon fighters as well as ending submarine and ship construction programs. It was agreed to in the end to buy the fighters but no final determination has been made on the other programs. Faced with mounting debt and budgetary pressures the Gordon Brown Labor government may not be able to continue this investment.

The United States has seen its annual deficit increase four-or-five fold in the first year of the Obama Administration. There will probably be little improvement in this over the next few years even if the economy does respond and recover. Too much money has been committed to the TARP and “Stimulus” as well as the unknown cost of health care reform. It may be that the U.S. will end up like England and the other European countries and not pay for a large military or combat operations.

The Seventies saw not only a reduction in the size of the U.S. military from the Vietnam Era but also a failure to invest in people and parts. This lead to a low morale, low capability military that ultimately failed in the Iranian desert. The Reagan Administrations saw not only an investment in new equipment but also in pay and benefits as well as increasing fund for training and support. The U.S. military ended that decade not only much better equipped technically but much more effective as Iraq found out in Desert Storm. The greatest fear of those who lead and manage the Armed Services is of a return to the Seventies. It is possible to reduce investment in new equipment but keeping the troops fed, paid and trained is a condition that is much harder to recover from.

Obviously a severe decline in defense spending will have a negative effect on the U.S. “military industrial complex” as the Government will be forced to shed jobs as happened in the Nineties as well as contractors. One fear would be another round of consolidation in the industry that may lead to only two or three main companies instead of the current five. The companies may still exist but they could be out of the defense business.

There is a good possibility that there will be a slow decline in the size and capability of the military much as has happened to the U.K.’s forces over the last sixty years. There may be a capable force that is not very big or well equipped to carry out the operations that the politicians desire. It will be more apparent when the FY 2011 budget is released by the Obama Administration in the next six months if this is a path the U.S. might face.

Matthew Potter works supporting US Army aviation programs. He holds degrees in history as well as studying at the Defense Acquisition University. He has written for Seeking Alpha and at his own website, Defense Procurement News.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Obama rallies Nato allies with al-Qaeda fear factor

    South China Morning Post - 235 days 8 hours 46 minutes ago

    US President Barack Obama warned his country's European Nato allies yesterday that they faced a greater risk of terrorist attacks than America and he needed their help to defeat al-Qaeda in Afghanistan

  • Microsoft Bing Wields Wolfram Alpha Vs. Google in Data Duel

    eWeek - 12 days 17 hours 56 minutes ago

    Microsoft Bing Wields Wolfram Alpha Vs. Google in Data Duel( Page 1 of 2 )Microsoft Nov. 11 inked a deal with Wolfram Alpha to begin offering computational search. Google does not do this, but a company engineer hinted that it is heading there. Right around the time Bing unveiled its deal with Wolfram Alpha, Google added World Bank data to its...

  • SecDef Gates Offers Blunt View to Afghan Mission

    Aviation Week - 301 days 13 hours 21 minutes ago

    Aviation Week's John Doyle blogs this from the congressional hearings today with U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates: Asked by Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) whether some NATO allies were "freeloading on the back of the U.S." in Afghanistan, Gates highlighted three areas where they could do more. Gates said NATO allies need to provide "more...

  • EU must move to single voice in IMF: Almunia

    EuroNews - 232 days 22 hours 5 minutes ago

    BRUSSELS - The European Union must consolidate its representation in the International Monetary Fund to be able to pull its weight in shaping global economic policy, the EU's top economic official said on Monday. I consider it crucial for the European Union to consolidate its voice in the global institutions, most importantly in the IMF,...

  • Helicopter Initiative

    Aviation Week - 30 days 45 minutes ago

    Nine NATO countries signed a declaration of intent on the fringes of the informal defense ministers meeting in Bratislava to pool Hip helicopters for alliance-led and other operations. The multinational helicopter initiative is designed to provide operations, particularly NATO's International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, with...

 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here