About Government Industry

BNET Government provides daily industry trends and global news coverage with insights for managers and executives within the world wide business of government contracting. We analyze new and interesting contract awards, government policy changes, and the trends in procurements and spending. There will also be discussions of the sector with a focus on small and innovative companies and business lines. The world's governments spend billions each year on a variety of hardware and services and the site will discuss how the money is being allocated.

Good News For Boeing In 2010 As More C-17 Transports Will Be Ordered

By Matthew Potter | Nov 4, 2009

The Obama Administration had requested no more funds for the C-17 transport in the 2010 Defense Budget. They had acquiesced in their mind to the inclusion of funding to buy several more in the 2009 Defense Supplemental bill passed by Congress last Fall. The Defense Department and U.S. Air Force state that the current plan to buy 205 of the heavily used transports are sufficient. Obviously Boeing (BA) would like to sell as many of the aircraft as it can to both the U.S. and overseas customers.

Both the House and Senate went ahead and added money in the 2010 Defense Appropriations for more aircraft. The House for only three and the Senate ten. The program is popular as it certainly is a system seeing use and provides jobs across the country. This means that many different Congressional Representatives and Senators like to add money for more of the transports. The head Defense appropriator in the House, Rep. John Murtha (D-PA), says that in good news for Boeing that the final bill when it comes out of conference will include funding at the Senate level, not the House. Ten is always better then three.

The total bill for the acquisition of the aircraft will be around $2.5 billion. It is estimated that 5,000 jobs alone in California at the old McDonnell Douglas plant rely on the program for employment. Another 25,000 across the country are related to the production of the aircraft. Then there are those who fly, maintain, fuel and make parts to keep it going. The multiplier effect of all this is quite high and provides impetus to keep it going.

The White House and Pentagon argue that just buying the aircraft is not the only cost. The ten aircraft will average $10 million a year each to keep flying. If they fly for thirty years that is $3 billion in un-inflated dollars the defense budget will need to contain to fly the aircraft. Of course that money is buying additional lift and transport capability that will support U.S. operations across the world.

The last word will be the Presidents, but it is hard to imagine he will veto the bill over this inclusion. Congress probably has enough votes to over turn the veto and the aircraft have a use waiting for them. There is also the consideration of jobs in the current “jobless” economic recovery. In fact one could argue as many have that buying military hardware would be one way to stimulate the economy. Somehow that wasn’t considered last March when the “Stimulus” bill was passed.

Matthew Potter works supporting US Army aviation programs. He holds degrees in history as well as studying at the Defense Acquisition University. He has written for Seeking Alpha and at his own website, Defense Procurement News.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • C-17 Continues To Provide For Boeing

    BNET Government - 48 days 20 hours 22 minutes ago

    With the passage of the 2010 defense budget Boeing (BA) is assured of further production of the C-17 transport. Despite the wishes of the Obama

  • DTN News: India Submits Letter Of Request For Potential Boeing C-17 Order?

    Defense Technology News - 32 days 17 hours 12 minutes ago

    DTN News: India Submits Letter Of Request For Potential Boeing C-17 Order? *Source: DTN News / Boeing (NSI News Source Info) LONG BEACH, Calif., - January 08, 2010: The Boeing Company [NYSE: BA] announced today that the U.S. government has received a Letter of Request from India's Ministry of Defence (MOD) and the Indian Air Force regarding...

  • DTN News: Australia ~ USAF C-17 Globemaster Sustainment Partnership

    Defense Technology News - 200 days 4 minutes ago

    DTN News: Australia ~ USAF C-17 Globemaster Sustainment Partnership *Source: DTN News / US Defense Security Cooperation Agency (NSI News Source Info) WASHINGTON - July 25, 2009: On July 17, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress of the Government of Australia’s request to continue participation in the USAF/Boeing...

  • Boeing May See More C-17 Production

    BNET Government - 127 days 21 hours 51 minutes ago

    The Senate fought back an effort to end funding for the C-17 transport in the 2010 defense budget. If this stays in the additional aircraft will

  • MOD signs contract for additional C-17 Globemaster

    Defense Industrial Base - 36 days 4 hours 52 minutes ago

    MOD signs contract for additional C-17 Globemaster An Equipment and Logistics news article January 4, 2010 Contracts have been signed for the RAF's seventh C-17 strategic transport aircraft to increase the size of the fleet that has seen heavy usage during recent operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Boeing C-17 Globemaster has proven...

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    bud phillips

    02/03/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Good News For Boeing In 2010 As More C-17 Transports Will Be Ordered

    Let me make sure I understand this. The Air Force and the Pentagon don't need any more C-17s, but Congress is going to buy ten more anyway just to keep the jobs in the their states? Once again, Congress is trying to be sure they get reelected instead of governing the nation. Unfortunately, there are way too many blivets in Congress, and the Nation suffers.

  •  
    2

    bud phillips

    02/03/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Good News For Boeing In 2010 As More C-17 Transports Will Be Ordered

    Let me make sure I understand this. The Air Force and the Pentagon don't need any more C-17s, but Congress is going to buy ten more anyway just to keep the jobs in the their states? Once again, Congress is trying to be sure they get reelected instead of governing the nation. Unfortunately, there are way too many blivets in Congress, and the Nation suffers.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement