About Health Care Industry

BNET Healthcare provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives, focusing on major health care providers, hospitals and facilities, insurance companies, and medical device manufacturers. In addition to detailed company profiles, you will find detailed industry analysis on new alliances and partnerships, healthcare products, medical patents, health care cost control, lawsuits, management and board changes, and all other important business issues.

As Health Costs Rise, Loss of Coverage Accelerates

By Ken Terry | Aug 21, 2009

Amid all the misleading talk about “death panels,” the “public option,” and the supposed “government takeover” of health care, it’s easy to miss how the lack of healthcare reform is affecting Americans. But Families USA, a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization, is doing its best to keep our eyes on the prize.

Families USA’s most recent report shows the toll that rapidly rising healthcare costs are taking on the insured. From 2000 to 2009, the report said, the cost of employer-based insurance for a family increased by 95.2 percent, while median family income advanced only 17.5 percent. Families USA blamed the huge rate increase on “the rising cost and increased use of medical treatments, inadequate oversight of insurance companies, lack of competition among insurers in many markets, and cost shifting from the growing numbers of uninsured to the insured,” according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. It estimated that more than $1,000 was tacked on to every insured family’s bill in 2008 for the care that the uninsured received.

With the number of uninsured Americans approaching 50 million, Families USA projects that 6.9 million more of us will lose our coverage by the end of 2010. While rising unemployment is partly responsible, so is the cost of coverage. “Between 1998 and 2008, the average family premium more than doubled, soaring from $5,791 to $12,680, an increase of 119 percent,” the report said. Meanwhile, from 2000 to 2008, the percent of firms offering coverage dropped from 69 percent to 63 percent.

In a different report, Families USA used Congressional Budget Office data to calculate how much the reform bill in the House of Representatives would increase coverage. It said that the House measure would lead to coverage of 23 million more people in 2013, the first year of implementation, and 37 million people by 2019. That isn’t universal coverage, but it’s a heckuva lot closer to it than we are today.

The House bill would expand coverage in several ways, said Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA. It would stop insurance companies from excluding people with preexisting insurance conditions. It would offer sliding-scale subsidies to people with incomes up to four times the federal poverty level so they could afford insurance. It would limit out of pocket costs when people get sick, and it would strengthen the safety net for the poor. Moreover, by reducing the number of uninsured, it would decrease the cost shift to the insured, thereby lowering premiums.

The shouting on the left and the right will accomplish nothing except possibly dooming us to many more years of declining access to healthcare. If we want to do something for our country, it’s time to step up and support reform. While the final result will not completely satisfy anyone, it will be a whole lot better than the status quo.

Ken Terry, a former senior editor at Medical Economics Magazine, is the author of the book Rx For Health Care Reform. follow all BNET Healthcare posts on Twitter.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • What's got lost in the public option kerfuffle

    The Health Care Blog - 26 days 3 hours 26 minutes ago

    By Matthew Holt Not so long ago, July this year in fact, PhRMA boss and former Dem Blue Dog & Republican Billy Tauzin told the Aspen Health Forum that a straw poll of Democrats at dinner with him in DC all said that they didn’t think there’d be a public option in the final bill arriving on Obama’s desk. By the way Tauzin, Dashle, and...

  • Government Death Panels Already Here

    No Smoke Blown - 69 days 17 hours 23 minutes ago

    Despite all the denials about the Sarah Palin claim that the proposed health care reforms being considered have so-called government death panels included, there is evidence in place of this intent. Check what’s happened at the Veteran’s Administration. Most of this information comes from an article in the Wall Street Journal, dated 8-19-09...

  • Centrists and the public option

    The Atlantic - 26 days 16 hours 28 minutes ago

    EJ Dionne asks a good question: why don't centrists approve of the public option? It doesn't involve a government takeover of the health-care system. The idea is that only consumers who want to enroll in a government-run health plan would do so. Anyone who preferred private insurance could get it. The public option also uses government...

  • Why Replacing The Public Option With A Cooperative Is A Very Bad Idea

    Wonk Room - 96 days 1 hour 33 minutes ago

    Since the administration suggested that it’s not committed to a “robust” public health insurance option, supporters of Sen. Kent Conrad’s (D-ND) co-op compromise have argued that a member-driven cooperative could achieve the goals of the public option and appease conservatives weary of increasing the government’s involvement in the...

  • Health Care Rationing Began This Week

    No Smoke Blown - 4 days 23 hours 2 minutes ago

    The Democrats broke out the crystal ball this week with the big announcement about mammograms. Precursor of all to come with the proposed government run health care plan, thousands are being given a death sentence to enable thousands more to have free health care. The unmitigated arrogance of the proponents of health care reform would

Links from the Web Buzz:
 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here