About Media Industry

BNET Media provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives in publishing, print, broadcast, film, and online media. In addition to media company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new partnerships, media products, mergers and acquisitions, labor and cost management, media buying, investments and a host of other important business issues.

Google Should Rank Us First, Say Media Bigs

By Catharine P. Taylor | Mar 23, 2009

Should official news sources get favorable treatment in Google’s search results? A lot of publishers think so. That’s the gist of a story today by Advertising Age’s Nat Ives, which quotes one (obviously discontented) “content executive” as saying: “You should not have a system where those who are essentially parasites off the true producers of content benefit disproportionately.”

Well, then, just call this entire post parasitic.

The idea of Google rankings being determined, in part, by the credibility of the source sounds promising on the surface, but think about it a little, and it raises all kinds of questions about what constitutes worthy content. To make a system like this work, you’d have to come up with some Good Housekeeping-style Seal of Approval method for separating content’s wheat from content’s chaff, and even then, it would probably be utterly flawed. Is it parasitic when the NBC Nightly News does its own version, quoting the same sources, of a story that appeared in that morning’s New York Times? Or is it not parasitic because NBC News, like The New York Times, is considered worthy content by the media elite,  who have lost a lot of ground over the last few years to the parasites? Is a piece on Huffington Post parasitic because it spins off of a story from the traditional media and the HuffPo (sniff!) is only a blog? Michael Wolff tells Ives the complaints from old-school publishers about Google rankings are “the plaintive cry of people who have lost their monopoly trying to scrounge a little of it back.”

Fortunately, Ives also mentions another reason why publishers don’t necessarily rank very high in Google search results: they’ve been slow to adapt their content to better work with Google’s algorithms. Far too often, Web sites of major off-line content producers simply shovel print content onto the Web, or betray a pathological fear of linking outside of their own sites, or don’t write Google-friendly headlines — and often, all three together. If you’re doing all this and your Web site still can’t get arrested in Google’s search results with the same frequency as Wikipedia does, well, then, maybe you have a legitimate beef.

Catharine P. Taylor has been covering digital media and advertising for almost 15 years and is a frequent speaker at conferences about media and advertising. She posts daily to BNET Media, writes the weekly Social Media Insider column for Mediapost and also has her own advertising blog, Adverganza.com. Follow her on Twitter or subscribe to the BNET Media Twitter feed.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Media Companies Demand Higher Rankings In Google Results

    PaidContent.org - 245 days 8 hours 22 minutes ago

    With their ad revenue in free fall, big media companies are clamoring for higher placement for their content in Google search results. According to AdAge, media companies think their articles should be ranked more prominently in Google searches when they are the "original" source for follow-on reports. "You should not have a system where those...

  • Brill: It's insane to keep offering web content for free

    Poynter Online - 221 days 16 hours 5 minutes ago

    null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null

  • Google & SEO’s: The Symbiotic and Parasitic Relationship. Who’s Who?

    KoMarketing Associates - 41 days 15 hours 35 minutes ago

    The Parasite Source: Wikimedia Commons Symbiotic Creatures Playing Nice Source: Wikimedia Commons Note for geeks and sticklers:  While parasites can have a mutually beneficial relationship (mutualism) with their host, I am questioning whether or not there is a parasitic relationship (parasitism) where the host does not benefit. I’ve been in...

  • Can Your Slashdot Comments Get You A Job?

    TechDirt - 110 days 18 hours 28 minutes ago

    It always amuses me when people insist that no one would create content without getting paid for it, since that's clearly not true. Plenty of people produce all sorts of valuable content for a variety of other reasons -- and even if they don't get paid for it directly, down the road, it can lead to opportunities to get paid. A good example of...

  • SaaS frustration

    ZDNet - 285 days 11 hours 28 minutes ago

    I've just come off a call with Phil Wainewright, fellow Irregular and saas maven on ZDNet. Phil and I go back many years so calls are always jocular and not always SFSV (Safe For Saas Vendors) ears. We were ruminating on Phil's swipe at Sage Software, a company I've followed ever since my first published piece was a review of Sage Sovereign 4.3...

 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here