About Media Industry

BNET Media provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives in publishing, print, broadcast, film, and online media. In addition to media company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new partnerships, media products, mergers and acquisitions, labor and cost management, media buying, investments and a host of other important business issues.

Election '08? Somebody Tell CBS, NBC, and ABC!

By David Weir | Apr 23, 2008

It’s a Presidential election year, which almost always means good financial news for the television industry. This year is no exception, as the political parties and leading candidates pour hundreds of millions of dollars into high-stakes TV ad campaigns. Meanwhile, where is network TV news in this mix?

If you’re talking about the traditional Big Three networks — ABC, NBC, and CBS, the answer increasingly is MIA. For example, none of the networks scheduled coverage of last night’s Pennsylvania Primary, nor did they show up for what was arguably the most important date in this election season to date, Tuesday, March 4, when tCNN Pagehe Ohio and Texas primaries were held.

The reason the news staffs stayed home on Tuesday nights has nothing to do with the news cycle and everything to do with money. It’s an “American Idol” night, to start with, so Fox almost always wins the ratings game. Meanwhile, the decision-makers inside the huge corporations that own the NBC, ABC, and CBS put up shows like “Big Brother, Just for Laughs, The Biggest Loser,” and “Dancing with the Stars.

Meanwhile, on March 4, John McCain was actually wrapping up the GOP nomination. But, in order to know that, you had to have cable, probably going to CNN, and Wolf Blitzer, and his annoying chest-pounding (”The best political team on television.”) He’s right, of course, if only because most of the competition has left the field.

In fact, the only networks that scheduled live coverage last night were the cables: CNN, MSNBC and FNC. CNN’s flashy setup includes a high-tech wall map of the U.S. that’s nearly as long as basketball star Yao Min is tall. Correspondent John King goes over to this magical map, and uses a touch-screen interface to zero in on or out from cities, counties, and regions of interest.

It’s a pretty cool map. So where did CNN get it? Turns out David Bohrman, the head of CNN’s political team, found it at a military intelligence trade show last year.

Hello? What’s the head of the best damn political team on television doing at a military intelligence trade show?

No comment. At least he’s trying to make this election interesting. Not so the Big Three network execs. But the last time I checked, the airwaves still belonged to the public, and the networks were given bandwith in return for supposedly serving the public interest. I don’t think that means growing fat off of political advertisements while sitting out the primary season.

Maybe the next administration’s FCC should look into this matter.

In addition to serving as a BNET Media analyst/blogger, David Weir is a veteran journalist and the author of several books. Weir is a co-founder and vice-president of the Center for Investigative Reporting, as well as an editorial board member of The Nation.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • - 14684 days 2 hours 15 minutes ago

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    danogram

    04/23/08 | Report as spam

    Their's Another Angle To This

    When your convictions are liberal in nature and you're doing what you can to support the DNC, you're well advised to tone down or tune out political news for the moment. Events of the past few weeks have been devastating for the Democrat primaries; Hillary has been adding to her long list of not so credible statements and solidifying the persona, despite her best efforts otherwise, that so many now loath. Worse (from the DNC perspective), Obama is now being seen as quite a lot less than the promise so many wanted to believe, so desperately, he was supposed to be. The deeper your coverage now, the more damage you will do to the very team for whom you are rooting. In the mean time, McCain is milquetoast, with an effort, to stay out of range; pretty boring, and it would do ratings no good at all to cover a boring Republican.

    If Obama had married a less bitter woman, had he not carried the baggage of both unscrupulous and racially hateful personalities, he might have been able to put Hillary away many weeks ago. Alas, too many have had their enthusiasm dampened by confrontation with reality. If Obama's early image had been real, he would be cruising to the Oval Office with a whole lot of exciting (profitable) coverage from all forms of media. The MSM is loath to bring more light to the frustrations of these campaigns. And they certainly can't afford to add to their own losses in the process.

  •  
    2

    AMPorterfield

    04/24/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Election '08? Somebody Tell CBS, NBC, and ABC!

    Hey, at least CNN's Bohrman got off his keester and WENT to a trade show. As I left journalism 20 years ago, I was dismayed by the growing mentality among editors (not you, David) that reporters were to sit at their desks and "work the phones." I was watching journalism turn from an inquiry into the daily human condition (an inquiry that could take many forms) into a boiler-room sales-like operation.

    What's interesting now is while the broadcast networks eschew political coverage, they want the advertising revenue brought about by political years. Look at CBS's explanation of their first-quarter results as a example.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a>)

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement