About Media Industry

BNET Media provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives in publishing, print, broadcast, film, and online media. In addition to media company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new partnerships, media products, mergers and acquisitions, labor and cost management, media buying, investments and a host of other important business issues.

Why Jon Stewart's Business Plan is Winning

By David Weir | Apr 24, 2008

It’s that time of year again, time for the BNET Media Industry Award for the Best Political Report on Television, that is, in the Context of the Best Business Plan.

I’ve been an vocal admirer of Comedy Central’s Jon Stewart for several years now, but what he did on Earth Night (April 22) simply went over the top. (Watch video.) At the end of another long Primary Tuesday skipped by the “major” networks, as reported here yesterday, we needed some comic relief.

As usual, we got it from The Daily Show.

But, this time, in addition to the laughs, Stewart presented the only serious national security reporting to be found anywhere on TV, or for that matter, throughout the media universe generally, that night. Why should this matter, in a business sense?

It’s simple. While securing the entertainment market is one aspect of a successful business plan for today’s media companies, adding in the influential demographic seeking news and opinion can be much more difficult to accomplish.

Stewart does it by crafting a far more entertaining (and therefore educational) way of telling vital stories. In this case, he retold the recent New York Times investigative tome on how military media analysts have been embedded by the Pentagon inside the major TV and radio networks.

You couldn’t find a better example of why the transition from old business plans to new ones is happening so rapidly than by comparing Stewart’s spoof, courtesy of Media Matters, with the original Times piece, which was so boring as to make sleeping pills outmoded.

(Note to NYT: Couldn’t you have presented the facts a little more concisely? Maybe you were too busy attempting to ward off dissident shareholders, plus the challenge presented by Rupert Murdoch — whose makeover of the Wall Street Journal is documented in a new study released today — to notice the larger picture?)

Besides, Murdoch’s in-your-face challenge to the FCC rules limited ownership in any one media market (he is adding Newsday to a New York media portfolio that already hits the limit of two newspapers and two television stations there) soon will overshadow the Times‘ reach so substantially that the Sulzberger family may have no choice but to seek additional investors.

Back to my point. If the Times‘ leaders did have the time to look around, they would be well-advised to explore how to get into a direct partnership with The Daily Show. Notice how Stewart’s version of the embedded generals report played up what the Times played down– that the Pentagon comically calls these fellows “message force multipliers.”

What really impressed me in Stewart’s report that night was his exclusive coverage of a new report issued by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) documenting how the Bush administration has utterly failed in its other “war” — against Al Qaeda, in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region.

This is usually the stuff of investigative journalism units, of the kind I used to run at the Center for Investigative Reporting, Inc.

Instead, it was on Comedy Central. So this year’s BNET Media Industry Award for the Best Political Report on Television — in the Context of the Best Business Plan ( or BMIAFTBPROT-ITCOTBBP) goes to none other than… The Daily Show.

And, of course the award for the best business plan goes to everybody who’s thinking outside of the old media box, which in due time will be recognized as the coffin it is.

[Editor's Note: BNET's PR analyst, Jon Greer, disagrees. He thinks that the Pentagon's coaching of its x-generals is, well, not that big a deal, and poo-poos the media for not finding its own independent sources. What do you think?]

In addition to serving as a BNET Media analyst/blogger, David Weir is a veteran journalist and the author of several books. Weir is a co-founder and vice-president of the Center for Investigative Reporting, as well as an editorial board member of The Nation.

BNET User Analysis

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    danogram

    04/24/08 | Report as spam

    Humor Wins Whenever Incompetence Rules

    Jon Stewart is a gifted comedian who, much like Will Rogers of several generations ago, has long mined the ever present and rich resource of government nonsense. It is Jon's great fortune that the grotesquely bloated government bureaucracies today offer exponential magnitudes of new material.

    Just as was true in Will Rogers' day, the humor one finds in often inexplicably inept, incompetent, and dishonest government activities dwarfs what is to be found in the private sector. The chief difference in these two arenas is simply monopoly. Much of the private sector operates in competition; incompetence and dishonesty generally result in failure. Government has no such burden.

    NYT does have a problem doing serious reporting on the GAO report; the report is a veritable mine field of political implications difficult to fit into a template which will support the DNC without exploding on one or both leading candidates between now and November.

    That Jon's humor was the closest thing to ?serious? reporting on this GAO report is less to his credit as a ?business? plan than it is an indictment on the MSM for the manner in which they select what to report, how, and when.

    You might consider resurrecting an investigative news service to produce a new white paper, SMSMOPTRAONRTECPQ (Suggested Main Stream Media Plan To Reduce Agenda Oriented News Reporting To Enhance Core Product Quality).

  •  
    2

    hotweir

    04/24/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Why Jon Stewart's Business Plan is Winning

    I did not take any position here on the Times' report. In fact, I believe I made it clear that it was boring beyond belief. What I respect is Stewart's unique approach to packaging serious news. He gets points for taking on the issues that matter. From my perspective, it is far less important what point of view he has than the fact that he is committed to engaging Americans in what (apparently) many consider too boring to consider: the national security implications of the current administration's foreign policy strategies. That that strategy has failed is no longer debatable. What's next? That is the question.

  •  
    3

    macnamband

    04/24/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Why Jon Stewart's Business Plan is Winning

    The Gray Lady has come to reside in the journalistic equivalent of Gray Gardens. From the A Section to the Editorial page they've been getting it wrong in the last six years, and and actually you could argue the decline began long before the WMD debacle. So yes, open it up. They need to recreate themselves.

  •  
    4

    hkohn

    04/25/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Why Jon Stewart's Business Plan is Winning

    There's a reason Jon Stewart and the rest of Off-Broadway TV is winning the ratings game, and it's not just that we want more laughs. They're the cutting edge of of the TV biz, with more acumen, more clever ideas, more hey-wake-up creativity and more of a let's-try-again attitude. Actually it's the same thing that worked for Network TV, but that was back in the Fifties & Sixties.

  •  
    5

    AMPorterfield

    04/25/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Why Jon Stewart's Business Plan is Winning

    Right on, Howard (and hi). Jon Stewart (and Mr. Colbert) win because they are compelling. They're compelling because they take several old techniques (jokes, journalism, television) and turn them on their ears to produce something we've never seen before. Now, sometimes people do that and it turns to mush. This time, they've more than hit a nerve. And they've been doing it for years. Meanwhile, the NYT continues to bore (even with groundbreaking, important stories).

    Anybody remember the movie "Network"? The brainstorming session with Faye Dunaway and her staff?

  •  
    6

    kdoctor@...

    06/07/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Why Jon Stewart's Business Plan is Winning

    David: Good piece. I've had similar thoughts lately, based both on Stewart and Colbert and the emergence of This American Life moving beyond Culture to Serious Policy. Check out recent Ira Glass (radio) programs on The Prosecutor (http://thislife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?episode=356) and The Giants Pool of Money (http://thislife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?sched=1242), the latter the best to-the-point storytelling on the subprime meltdown I've heard/read.

    Multimedia journalism is being born in unexpected and exciting ways. It's curious that the Times (boring) treatment grows simply out of the print newspaper metaphor and that Times, while adding more multimedia, isn't yet learning from Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert and Ira Glass. Maybe soon.

    Ken Doctor (www.contentbridges.com)

  •  
    7

    uzigzag

    07/30/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Why Jon Stewart's Business Plan is Winning

    Having been in the media business for some time, it never fails to bring a smile to my face. All the old additives and fillers spooned down my throat by my mentors never really sunk in because of people like John Stewart. Today media is a changing everything it touches, and it should. It's everywhere and it should be...it's our info..give it
    to me (us). Jon just has a way with people and policy that is right for the time. I for one am happy for him. At least he's not one upping for upping sake. He actually has competent views that reflect society and the morals that ride with them. GOOD FOR HIM!

  •  
    8

    hotweir

    12/25/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Why Jon Stewart's Business Plan is Winning

    Thank you, all, for these comments. A long time after I published this piece, it continues to get visits, and I really appreciate all of your comments!

  •  
    9

    SariahU

    03/18/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Why Jon Stewart's Business Plan is Winning

    Unbiased reporting is what we need. At any rate, unbiased reporting might be dead on CNBC. Rick Santelli put on a show that?s being dubbed the Chicago Tea Party. During his business news segment on CNBC, Santelli got on the floor of the Chicago stock exchange and went on a tangent were he extolled the virtue of giving gobs of money in a cash advance to Wall Street and advocated for everything including the execution of the average citizen. CNBC got called on their shenanigans, including both Santelli and Jim Cramer by Jon Stewart on The Daily Show, where the unbiased reporting is intentionally left out ? but that?s called satire, not dereliction of duty.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here