About Pharma Industry

BNET Pharma provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about major manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and medicine. In addition to detailed drug company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new partnerships, drug patents and products, cost management, investments, pharmaceutical related lawsuits, and a host of other important business issues.

Pfizer Burns More Money on the Inhaled Insulin Bonfire

By Jim Edwards | Sep 18, 2008

local_technosphere_insulin.jpgAfter burning $2.8 billion, Pfizer is throwing yet more money on the inhaled insulin bonfire. The company’s announcement that it has a deal to switch former Exubera patients to MannKind’s TechnoSphere is a real head-scratcher.

One unanswered question is, exactly how many Exubera patients are there? Pfizer recorded Exubera’s revenue in the third quarter of 2007 at only $4 million. You read that right — Pfizer spent or wrote down $2.8 billion and in return got $4 million.

exuberabong.jpgMannKind thinks it has solved the main problem with inhaled insulin — Pfizer’s Exubera embarrassed its users because it looked like a bong, while MannKind’s TechnoSphere is a plastic box the size of a cellphone. (Oddly, the TechnoSphere neither emits disco music nor is a sphere, but this is the inhaled insulin business where logic rarely prevails.)

One thing MannKind hasn’t solved is the fact that it does not free diabetics from needles — they still need to prick themselves for blood tests. And it also doesn’t cure a key worry about inhaled insulin — long-term lung damage.

But the biggest hurdle at this point may be the built-in skepticism of the marketplace itself. Here’s what people have said over the last year about inhaled insulin and MannKind’s product in particular:

MannKind’s data is “less than eye popping.” — Thomas Russo, of R.W. Baird & Co.

We still do not believe that (TechnoSphere) is a viable product and therefore reiterate our Sell rating on MannKind shares. — Jon Le Croy of Natixis Bleichroeder, Aug. 12 2008.

Nektar announced today that Exubera (inhaled insulin) use has been associated with an increased number of lung cancer cases in ongoing clinical trials. We view this as an absolute disaster for MannKind and do not see a believable scenario in which the FDA would approve another inhaled insulin. — LeCroy, April 9, 2008.

Based on the risks around (TechnoSphere) data, the lack of a partner, recent withdrawals/discontinuations of inhaled insulin programs by large pharma, the key question of market viability, existing negative physician sentiment, and a high cash burn, we are downgrading MNKD shares to an Underperform. — Jeffries & Co. note, March 10, 2008.

After an assessment of the financial performance of Exubera, an inhalable form of insulin for the treatment of diabetes, as well as its lack of acceptance by patients, physicians and payers, we decided to exit the product. — Pfizer, in its own annual report.

In addition to Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Alkermes, and Novo Nordisk have all bailed on inhaled insulin.

Standing alone, then, are MannKind and Pfizer. MannKind has sunk $700 million into its TechnoSphere. That’s a lot of money for a market with a history of producing only $4 million in returns.

Jim Edwards, a former managing editor of Adweek, has covered drug marketing at Brandweek for four years, and is a former Knight-Bagehot fellow at Columbia University's business and journalism schools. Follow him on Twitter or send him an email.

BNET User Analysis

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    BNET's Jim Edwards

    12/14/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Pfizer Burns More Money on the Inhaled Insulin Bonfire

    A reader writes:

    The problem with Exubera was the lack of marketing, not the product itself. I have waited my ENTIRE life for this type of product (37 yrs.) I am very brittle and finally inhaled has released me from violent seizures and see saw blood sugars AND, YES needles. Poking ones finger is nothing compared to painful injection sights despite rotating when you jab at least 5 times a day.

    > I am from Canada and went to a lot of expense and trouble to get this type of medication. I have no regrets; only that this miracle has been removed and the nightmares begin again.

    > What bothers me is why so many people are living in the dark ages about inhaled insulin? Change is necessary in this case yet so many are opposed and extremely skeptical.

    > All you hear is hype about "THE PEN", or another "Virtually Painless" blood glucose device being marketed to make more money. Who cares?

    > Injections hurt despite rotating sites, a lot of diabetics have allergies to subcutaneous injections (ME). It also really sucks when you inject your insuln and have to wait incase it leaks a bit or bleeds on your clothes (not nice) and embarassing.

    > INHALED INSULIN is the biggest discovery regarding this disease since Banting & Best's remarkable insulin discovery.

    > I am glad Mankind is taking the risk. I am waiting for it to become marketed. It is worth the risk instead of just sitting idle and not being active regarding my control of this disease with its horrific complications.

    > Thanks for enabling me to "spout off" to you.

    > Shelley Doherty

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement