About Pharma Industry

BNET Pharma provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about major manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and medicine. In addition to detailed drug company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new partnerships, drug patents and products, cost management, investments, pharmaceutical related lawsuits, and a host of other important business issues.

Wilco's Bennett Killed by Fentanyl; Is It Time to Tighten Rules on Patch Drugs?

By Jim Edwards | Jun 25, 2009

An Illinois coroner said Wilco songwriter Jay Bennett died of an accidental overdose from a fentanyl painkiller patch. The death should give the pharmaceutical industry pause to ask whether patch delivery systems should be subject to higher standards before being approved.

Fentanyl patches, marketed as Duragesic by Johnson & Johnson’s PriCara unit and also available as generics, are for opioid-tolerant patients who need round-the-clock pain relief. Fentanyl is also highly addictive, about 100 times more potent than heroin. Bennett was using the patch to dull pain from his hip, which he injured performing, according to the Chicago Tribune. He did not die from recreational drug use, the coroner noted. (It is not known whether a J&J or generic patch killed him.)

The problem with patches is that they use a structurally inappropriate organ to deliver medicine — the skin. If a drug can be persuaded to pass though the skin, it enters the blood at a constant, unmediated rate. (By contrast, a drug swallowed as a pill will be digested, and the dose in the blood will rise and then fall before the next pill is taken, giving the body a “rest” between metabolism tasks.) A constant rate of dose delivery sounds great on paper — doctors can be sure of more accurately delivering the correct amount of medicine. But because transdermal patches don’t give patients’ bodies a rest, patients may end up getting too much drug — as Bennett did.

The history of skin-patch transdermal delivery systems is an unfortunate one. Whether it’s contraception, painkillers or ADHD drugs, they are plagued with problems. Here’s a list:

Jim Edwards, a former managing editor of Adweek, has covered drug marketing at Brandweek for four years, and is a former Knight-Bagehot fellow at Columbia University's business and journalism schools. Follow him on Twitter or send him an email.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Watson's Fentanyl Patch Recall Is 6th So Far; Why Don't Patches Work?

    BNET Pharma - 105 days 20 hours 49 minutes ago

    Watson Pharmaceuticals has issued a recall for its fentanyl painkiller patch product, some of which have leaked. The company said: … exposure to fentanyl gel may lead to serious adverse events, including respiratory depression and possible overdose, which may be fatal. By BNET’s count, this is at least the sixth fentanyl patch recall since...

  • Did Wilco's Jay Bennett's Die Because He Lacked Health Insurance? [Deaths]

    Gawker - 182 days 10 hours 24 minutes ago

    Today news broke that Jay Bennett , a singer/songwriter most famous for his work with the band Wilco, died during his sleep on Sunday. Bennett, who earlier in the month sued Wilco frontman Jeff Tweedy , recently blogged that he needed hip replacement surgery, but lacked Did Wilco's Jay Bennett Die Because He Lacked Health Insurance? [Deaths]

    Gawker - 182 days 10 hours 24 minutes ago

    Today news broke that Jay Bennett , a singer/songwriter most famous for his work with the band Wilco, died during his sleep on Sunday. Bennett, who earlier in the month sued Wilco frontman Jeff Tweedy , recently blogged that he needed hip replacement surgery, but lacked Cephalon - Actiq: the migraine treatment was a success, unfortunately the patient died

    PharmaGossip - 293 days 22 hours 29 minutes ago

    Court documents link a Wichita-area doctor accused in 59 overdose deaths to a pharmaceutical company that illegally marketed to doctors a highly addictive narcotic for non-approved uses like treating migraines. An Associated Press review of court documents show a connection between Cephalon Inc., one of the world's top 10 biopharmaceutical...

  • Mother died 'after using patches'

    South China Morning Post - 6 days 12 hours 17 minutes ago

    A philanthropist died a week after she was discharged from Hong Kong Adventist Hospital while using painkilling patches, prescribed by doctors, which contained dangerous drugs, the Coroner's Court heard yesterday

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Manabozho

    06/26/09 | Report as spam

    Mischaracterizes transdermal delivery?

    Not sure who characterizes transdermal delivery as a "...structurally inappropriate route?" Last time I looked, it wasn't the US FDA, or any other regulatory body in a Western technological country.

    Confusing statement #2--nothing about the transdermal route of delivery dictates that the drug is available "at a constant, unmediated rate." Constant, maybe, but certainly no more ?unmediated? than if the same drug molecule arrived in the bloodstream via a different mode of administration. Once in the bloodstream, what?s the reason that drug molecules should behave any differently based on whether their route was transdermal, oral, subcu injection, IV injection, across the buccal membrane, in a suppository, etc? How could the molecule "remember" how it got there, and how would it do anything differently because of that?

    Characterizing bolus dosing as having some unique, beneficial "rest" period is another, odd compound-conjecture. Sawtooth delivery pattern and oral dosage are separate things?neither of which dictates a return to baseline. In fact, one of the principal early attractions of controlled delivery--oral, transdermal, or any other method--was the already-existing problem of baseline creep for bolus dosage forms, oral and otherwise. In other words, there was a problem of patients self-overdosing, which was part of a much broader mis-dosing problem resulting from the many weaknesses of patient compliance. Patients can compress their dosing intervals, or extend them, or forget them entirely. The oral route of dosing is completely dependent on patients' self-dosing intervals, which have repeatedly been demonstrated to be highly variable and poorly remembered. (Google "patient compliance with medication.")

    Interrupting any dosing method for long enough will re-establish an unmedicated baseline in the patient, if doing so has any medical merit. This could be effected as easily with patch technology as with any other dosing form, just by going patchless for awhile between applications. Why does transdermal technology merit separate criticism versus other dosing methods / routes?

    BTW--I am not an employee, consultant, or any other kind of representative of any transdermal enterprise, nor do I receive any compensation or other benefit from posting these observations. Years ago, I worked in a controlled-delivery development company.

  •  
    2

    BNET's Jim Edwards

    07/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Wilco's Bennett Killed by Fentanyl; Is It Time to Tighten Rules on Patch Drugs?

    In terms of structurally inappropriate routes for drugs, see the comments section in this post:

    http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10003032/mannkind-has-mountain-to-climb-if-fda-approves-afresa-and-technosphere/

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement