About Pharma Industry

BNET Pharma provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about major manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and medicine. In addition to detailed drug company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new partnerships, drug patents and products, cost management, investments, pharmaceutical related lawsuits, and a host of other important business issues.

MannKind Has Mountain to Climb If FDA Approves Afresa and TechnoSphere

By Jim Edwards | Jul 9, 2009

MannKind bought the old inhaled insulin plant* inventory Pfizer used for Exubera last month, just one month after the FDA accepted its application for Afresa, another inhaled insulin product.

So the company appears poised for a big leap — if the FDA allows MannKind to sell its drug (delivered via its TechnoSphere inhaler, pictured) it can finally start earning some revenues.

Take a look at how high that leap will have to be. So far, MannKind’s net loss to shareholders is more than $1.4 billion. The company burns about $60 million to $70 million a quarter, and it hasn’t even got into its commercial launch expenses yet. Given that Pfizer only made $12 million in YTD sales on Exubera, MannKind’s TechnoSphere will have to be about 116 times more popular than Exubera to make back that $1.4 billion.

It could happen. Exubera was a disaster because the device was huge, the technique to use it tricky, and the dosing calculation difficult. The TechnoSphere is small and MannKind promises it will be easy to use.

MannKind’s problems don’t end there. On its Q1 2008 call, management discussed a cancer signal that had occured in Exubera patients, one of the reasons Pfizer ended its marketing of the product:

CEO Alfred Mann: there have been six newly diagnosed cases of primary lung malignancies among EXUBERA treated patients. And one newly diagnosed case among comparative treated patients.

The actual incidence of lung cancer was consistent with statistics within the general population and that incidence was actually low because every one of those patients was a smoker.

Nearly every analyst on the call had questions about cancer. One problem is, even if the cancers only appear in smokers, does this mean that former smokers can’t use inhaled insulin? Management said the FDA has not yet asked it for a long-term outcomes study — which it surely will if there’s a cancer signal in the data.

A year later, on the Q1 2009 call, Mann said the cancer controversy had not gone away:

It seems to me that the concern about lung cancer should have ended by now since there is no factual basis for such concern. Even for Exubera, there was no conclusion as to causality or acceleration and AFRESA is so very, very different. In relation with AFRESA, it is certainly less risky than for some other chronically entailed drugs and even less so than breathing in a large city. An advisory committee has dismissed any risk of lung cancer from AFRESA. While we are seriously concerned about this risk, all of the data gives us confidence that any concern about lung cancer with AFRESA is without foundation and is bogus. Nevertheless, we must address some perceptions that have been created.

No doubt. But think about that: Here’s a company with a novel, non-injection diabetes treatment that already has its application in with the FDA in a category where there are no competitors — and no one wants to get into a joint marketing venture with them no one has yet agreed to get into a joint marketing venture with them. Mann indicated that might be about to change in his Q1 2009 call:

Last May, we ourselves reset partnership talks and we have always said that we would not discuss partnership status until there is an actual contract. However, I will say as did Hakan that we are in serious discussions with a number of companies that we believe would be excellent partners for AFRESA.

Investor Nate Pile wrote recently of his speculative buy in the firm. He could have been writing about the firm itself:

I believe we are looking at a situation in which we will either lose most of our money, or triple (or better) our investment in a fairly short period of time.

*See comments section for clarification. This article has been updated to reflect the fact that while MannKind has not yet signed up a marketing partner, it says it is in talks with companies.

Jim Edwards, a former managing editor of Adweek, has covered drug marketing at Brandweek for four years, and is a former Knight-Bagehot fellow at Columbia University's business and journalism schools. Follow him on Twitter or send him an email.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • MannKind seeks FDA approval for inhaled insulin

    FierceMarkets - 252 days 6 hours 3 minutes ago

    MannKind is determined to push into the commercial market for inhaled insulin--an ambitious move that Pfizer has already tried and failed . Yesterday MannKind announced that it had filed for FDA approval to market Afresa, an inhaled insulin--designed to control hyperglycemia--that is likely to become the company's first commercial product....

  • Novelties: A New Way to Inhale, Not Inject, Insulin

    New York Times - 44 days 22 hours 19 minutes ago

    A small inhaler and insulin powder created by the MannKind Corporation are before the F.D.A. for marketing approval

  • The Scoop on MannKind's Afresa Partnership Delay

    BNET Pharma - 43 days 14 hours 46 minutes ago

    MannKind’s president and chief operating officer, Hakan Edstrom, explains why the company's partnership for inhaled insulin product Afresa has

  • Breath of fresh air for inhaled insulins?

    Scrip News - 167 days 5 hours 5 minutes ago

    MannKind Pharmaceuticals has presented new clinical trial data on its inhaled insulin Afresa, suggesting that the medicine is comparable to the standard of care. While this news spurred confidence in the market, causing a 14% rise in the company's

  • Can MannKind deliver on deal expectations?; Exelixis shares slide on disappointing cancer data;

    FierceMarkets - 175 days 4 hours 49 minutes ago

    > Analysts are divided over MannKind#039s prospects for gaining a rich partnership deal on its experimental inhaled insulin therapy. MannKind#039s shares have tripled in price in anticipation of a deal, but some of the analysts are distinctly skeptical that MannKind can succeed in an area where much bigger names have failed. Report >...

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Brian Orelli

    07/09/09 | Report as spam

    RE: MannKind Has Mountain to Climb If FDA Approves Afresa and TechnoSphere

    Technically MannKind only bought the insulin. Sanofi exercised its option to buy the plant.

  •  
    2

    BNET's Jim Edwards

    07/09/09 | Report as spam

    RE: MannKind Has Mountain to Climb If FDA Approves Afresa and TechnoSphere

    @Brian: Not technically but actually, I'd say. I corrected the item -- thanks for pointing it out.

  •  
    3

    sxiao

    07/09/09 | Report as spam

    RE: MannKind Has Mountain to Climb If FDA Approves Afresa and TechnoSphere

    "no one wants to get into a joint marketing venture with them"

    This statement is inconsistent with management's recent comments on this matter. If this statement is really true then you must have discussed this matter with MNKD's potential partners to make this determination. If so, please disclose the names of these companies. Thank-you.

  •  
    4

    sxiao

    07/09/09 | Report as spam

    RE: MannKind Has Mountain to Climb If FDA Approves Afresa and TechnoSphere

    A few comments:

    1. The amount of funds invested in Afresa in the past, which is a portion the $1.4 billion you mention, will have no impact on future cash flows. As such, this is somewhat of an irrelevant accounting comment. The cash flow part is much more pertinent.

    2. While the Afresa device and dosing is much better than Exubera?s device, these are just ancillary benefits of Afresa over Exubera. The whole reason for Afresa, which you have neglected to mention, is that it has significant medical advantages over injected insulin. This was not the case for Exubera. This is a huge, huge, difference.

    3. I think you might be making a leap of faith on your cancer analysis. It would appear that you believe that because both Exubera and Afresa are ?inhaled insulin? that because one of them (Exubera) has had patients get lung cancer, that the FDA will require a ?long-term outcomes study? for Afresa. Exubera and Afresa are not the same. The Afresa product needs to stand on its own data. So what does the data say? Their studies show that in the over 2000 patient years, incidence of lung cancer is lower than the normal population (they had one lung cancer incident - and guess what? it was a smoker). Furthermore, MNKD did cancer studies in rats (which Exubera never had) and no carcinogenic effect was found. Perhaps I'm going out on a limb here but perhaps smoking causes lung cancer? Just a thought.

    4. The statement that "no one wants to get into a joint marketing venture with them" is inconsistent with management's recent comments on this matter. If this statement is really true then you must have discussed this matter with MNKD's potential partners to make this determination. If so, it would be interesting to hear the names of these companies and what they said to you.

    Full disclosure: Long MNKD. No affiliation with the company.

  •  
    5

    silentbobsilent

    07/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: MannKind Has Mountain to Climb If FDA Approves Afresa and TechnoSphere

    In addition to the excellent points sxiao presented, I would like to mention these :

    5. The author references Mannkind's Q1 conference call. I would like to point out that this was Q1 2008(!), right after the Exubera cancer scare. Since then, phaseIII trials were completed and results confirmed Afresa's safety. There is no cancer signal in the data! Either the author didn't do his research, or he 'conveniently' forgot to mention this.

    6. After quoting Alfred Mann, the author gleefully quotes Hakan Edstrom from the same Q1 2008 conference call, about how partnership discussions were suspended. From that he concludes that: "no one wants to get into a joint marketing venture with them". First of all, the author makes it seem discussions were suspended because partners lost interest, which is false because Mannkind itself suspended the talks because they thought they would get better terms on the deal after the safety data was out. Second of all, safety data is now out and partnership talks have been started again. The author not only 'forgets' to mention this but tries to mislead the reader into thinking that talks are still suspended!

    In closing I would like to say that considering the entire article is misleading it seems pretty clear that this author either has malicious intent or is incompetent.

    I would advise everybody to be very cautious with anything this author writes.

    Disclosure : Long on MNKD.

  •  
    6

    BNET's Jim Edwards

    07/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: MannKind Has Mountain to Climb If FDA Approves Afresa and TechnoSphere

    Folks,

    Apologies -- I have updated the article based on your comments and linked to the Q1 2009 call. However, it's worth pointing out that Mann's comments on that call somewhat reinforce my case: That the cancer thing is a cloud hanging over Afresa and MannKind has yet to sign up a partner that can provide a sales force to market this thing.

    To add to my previous comment, Edstrom says on the call that MannKind bought both the inventory AND the factory in the Pfizer transaction.

  •  
    7

    DrSD

    07/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: MannKind Has Mountain to Climb If FDA Approves Afresa and TechnoSphere

    Hi,

    I think the problem on the cancer front might just be because of the Insulin (being a macromolecule of sorts) being absorbed through a highly sensitive interface (the lung tissues - epithelia, esp. the basement membranes). The physiological load this 'transaction' might just be a lot more disruptive than we know as yet....there have been instances where drugs have passed scrutiny and then yielded iatrogenic fatalities.....that's why, technically, phase-IV was created, to ensure post-marketing surveillance. Given that Afresa is what it is, I would still watch this event gingerly than argue safety for inhalable models for macromolecules..... just a thought.

  •  
    8

    BNET's Jim Edwards

    07/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: MannKind Has Mountain to Climb If FDA Approves Afresa and TechnoSphere

    @DrSD07: Thanks for the note. There is a high level of resistance in the investment community to the idea that drugs should not be delivered through interfaces that are not designed to absorb substances en masse.

    I recently suggested in a post that the skin was a "structurally inappropriate" route for delivering drugs and was lambasted in the comments section beneath it:

    http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10002868/wilcos-bennett-killed-by-fentanyl-is-it-time-to-tighten-rules-on-patch-drugs/

    Perhaps the lungs have the same problem? ie, they're designed for one thing but not everything ...

  •  
    9

    silentbobsilent

    07/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: MannKind Has Mountain to Climb If FDA Approves Afresa and TechnoSphere

    Question for you Mr Edwards:
    Are you too lazy to do research, or does a high workload preclude you from doing it?

    It is common knowledge that the original insulin agreement with Pfizer consisted of two parts:
    a) Bulk insulin
    b) The factory.
    Sanofy-Aventis had a right of first refusal on the factory and they exercised it so Mannkind was left with only the bulk insulin purchase, which is what they prefer because now they have enough insulin to last several years at maximum production.

    In your latest comment you mention: "comments on that call somewhat reinforce my case: That the cancer thing is a cloud hanging over Afresa and MannKind". The cancer concerns that Al Mann is referring to are concerns within the investment community, notably among analysts. These are not widespread concerns in the medical community, and you 'forget' to differentiate between these groups. Cancer and revenue concerns within the investment community are in fact the reason why Mannkind has become such a compelling investment opportunity.

    It is very clear that you only want to state the bearish case, and have no interest in presenting a balanced case. If you should one day desire to write a thoughtful article about Mannkind, I propose that you first spend some time actually reading up on the stock itself, and not just echo the opinions of a few sell side analysts. I am sure you are intelligent enough to make up your own mind given enough information.

  •  
    10

    BNET's Jim Edwards

    07/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: MannKind Has Mountain to Climb If FDA Approves Afresa and TechnoSphere

    OK, once more ... and this time with feeling! SilentBob is right, MannKind bought the inventory and not the plant. Here's what what MannKind's own press release said about the Pfizer deal, and you can see why there's a possibility for confusion regarding who, exactly, bought what:

    "MannKind had also entered into a sale and purchase agreement with Pfizer relating to Pfizer?s insulin manufacturing facility in Frankfurt, Germany. MannKind?s rights and obligations under this latter agreement were subject to a right of first refusal in favor of Sanofi-Aventis. On June 8, 2009, Sanofi-Aventis exercised its right of first refusal, thereby releasing MannKind from any obligations under this agreement."

    Regardless: Whether they bought the inventory, the factory, both or neither is immaterial. The open question is whether the market will accept inhaled insulin. I can't see a slam-dunk case either way. I'll be happy to write Al Mann an apology if he makes back his $919 million.

  •  
    11

    silentbobsilent

    07/14/09 | Report as spam

    RE: MannKind Has Mountain to Climb If FDA Approves Afresa and TechnoSphere

    Will you also write an apology to the readers that you discouraged from investing in Mannkind? If Afresa becomes a blockbuster, will that apology make up for their lost profits?

    Regardless : The fact that you couldn't get your research right even on the second try signals just how much your opinion is worth.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement