About Pharma Industry

BNET Pharma provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about major manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and medicine. In addition to detailed drug company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new partnerships, drug patents and products, cost management, investments, pharmaceutical related lawsuits, and a host of other important business issues.

American Cancer Society: Americans Don't Want to Cure Cancer

By Trista Morrison | Aug 2, 2009

“People say we want a cure . . . but the American people have decided what their priorities are and their priorities don’t include cancer,” Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, said in a recent BioWorld interview.

Brawley was referring to the fact that the entire annual budget for the National Cancer Institute is less than the budget for two weeks in Iraq.

That’s part of the reason the treatment of metastatic cancer has been a “disappointment” over the last 40 years, according to Brawley.

New cancer drugs may be marketed by drug companies, but a lot of them get their start in academic labs funded by NCI grants. As of now, the NCI can only afford to fund 10 percent of the grants it approves, Brawley said. The money tends to go to conservative choices because “nobody wants to fund an idea that might fail and get accused of wasting grant money,” he added.

An example: Brian Druker’s early research on Gleevec (imatinib) was turned down by the NIH as too risky and “darn near didn’t get funded by the ACS either,” Brawley said. Gleevec, now marketed by Novartis for chronic myeloid leukemia and certain stomach cancers, has been hailed as one of the greatest breakthrough cancer drugs and generated $3.7 billion in sales last year.

Not all cancer drugs have been as successful as Gleevec – either financially or in terms of efficacy. In fact, not many have. Brawley argued that decreased smoking and increased screening for breast and colorectal cancer have had a lot more impact on cancer death rates than new drugs.

The survival benefit of drugs for metastatic cancers is often measured in “a few days to a few months,” Brawley complained. When Tarceva (erlotinib, OSI Pharmaceuticals and Genentech/Roche) was approved for pancreatic cancer based on a survival benefit of less than two weeks, someone mailed Brawley a stopwatch.

That said, biotech drugs are still important, in Brawley’s opinion, because developing drugs that improve survival by two or three weeks is a “step toward getting three years.” And there are always patients who exceed the averages, achieving results nothing short of miraculous.

With venture capital tough to come by, angel investors seeing their pocketbooks pummeled by the market, and nonprofits struggling to keep their own doors open, that government grant funding is more important than ever. Let’s hope somebody besides the folks already in the choir hears Brawley preaching.

War on Cancer photo by Flickr user Danny McL, CC2.0.

Trista Morrison is a staff writer at BioWorld Today, a daily newspaper that's been covering the biotech industry about as long as there's been a biotech industry to cover.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Has cancer screening been oversold? Cancer Council responds

    Crikey - 31 days 9 hours 31 minutes ago

    The New York Times, as previously mentioned, is reporting a shift in screening policy at the the American Cancer Society, which is now saying that the benefits of early detection of  many cancers, especially breast and prostate, have been “overstated”. “We don’t want people to panic,” Dr Otis Brawley, the Society’s chief medical...

  • Cancer Society: advantages to screening have been exaggerated

    Schwitzer - 32 days 4 hours 10 minutes ago

    From the New York Times: The American Cancer Society, which has long been a staunch defender of most cancer screening, is now saying that the benefits of detecting many cancers, especially breast and prostate, have been overstated. It is quietly working on a message, to put on its Web site early next year, to emphasize that screening for...

  • Prostate Cancer Screenings Essentially Useless

    NaturalNews - 156 days 10 hours 28 minutes ago

    (NaturalNews) Regular prostate cancer screening has no effect on the risk of death from the disease, according to a large-scale, long-term study conducted by researchers from the National Cancer Institute and published online in the New England Journal of Medicine . "There was little or no scientific evidence that it saved lives," said Otis...

  • Powerful editorial by Otis Brawley on prostate cancer screening

    Schwitzer - 82 days 19 hours 33 minutes ago

    This week's Journal of the National Cancer Institute includes a new analysis by Gilbert Welch and Peter Albertsen showing how much overdiagnosis and overtreatment have been the result of 20 years of more aggressive prostate cancer screening. American Cancer Society chief medical officer Dr. Otis Brawley wrote an accompanying editorial....

  • Urologistsapos call for baseline PSAs in 40 year olds puzzles ACS chief

    Schwitzer - 151 days 18 hours 46 minutes ago

    A news article in the current issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (subscription required for full content) discusses the American Urological Association's new recommendation for a risk assessment for prostate cancer for all asymptomatic men at age 40 years with an estimated life expectancy of more than 10 years. In the...

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    jenyj89

    08/03/09 | Report as spam

    RE: American Cancer Society: Americans Don't Want to Cure Cancer

    I am a breast cancer patient, with 3 more chemo treatments and 33 radiation treatments to go before I can say "survivor". But I see as Americans we seem more interested in having medicines that will make us look younger when we are getting old, or have medicines have give us an erection when we can't get one (then spending thousands of dollars on a campaign to sell it). We don't seem to want to cure cancer until it touches close to us and then it's just a passing feeling, then we go back to our little work of wanting to look younger and thiner and stay erect longer than our grandparents did........when there is so much more that medicine should be doing for us!!!

    I live for the day when no ever has to be told that they have cancer, when no woman ever has to learn that she has to lose one or both breasts to cancer....it's a hurt that doesn't go away, you just live with it. Someday we will conquer cancer but it will take alot more people being more committed and not just paying lipservice to their committment.

  •  
    2

    Trista Morrison

    08/03/09 | Report as spam

    RE: American Cancer Society: Americans Don't Want to Cure Cancer

    Sometimes what sells in this world tells a sad story, and not just in the drug industry. Best of luck to you with your treatments and everything else.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here