About Pharma Industry

BNET Pharma provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about major manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and medicine. In addition to detailed drug company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new partnerships, drug patents and products, cost management, investments, pharmaceutical related lawsuits, and a host of other important business issues.

UPDATED: Doc Who Urged Antipsychotics for 3-Year-Olds Funded by J&J, AZ and Shire

By Jim Edwards | Aug 28, 2009

A doctor who wrote in an academic journal that preschoolers may suffer from depression and could be good candidates for atypical antipsychotics received funding from three drug companies that make mental health medicines.

Dr. Joan Luby, a professor of child psychiatry at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, wrote that children as young as three years old may suffer from bipolar disorder, and that there are “promising findings for the use of atypical antipsychotic agents and mood stabilizers, both singly and in combination” in the very young. Atypical antipsychotics are not FDA-approved for such use.

Her article, in a 2009 journal titled Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, does not disclose that in the past Luby’s work has been funded by Janssen (the unit of Johnson & Johnson that markets Risperdal), or that she has given talks sponsored by AstraZeneca (maker of Seroquel), and has been a consultant for Shire (maker of Adderall XR and Vyvanse).

Luby (pictured) disclosed her relationships with drug companies in a 2006 article in the Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, which was also about depression in preschoolers. Her disclosure said:

Disclosure: Dr. Luby has received grant/research support from Janssen, has given occasional talks sponsored by AstraZeneca, and has served as a consultant for Shire Pharmaceuticals.

Luby did not return an email or two phone calls requesting comment. It is not clear whether academic journal rules at the time required her disclosures. AZ said:

AstraZeneca records show that Dr. Luby participated in our speakers program from 2003-2004. It is AstraZeneca policy to compensate speakers according to the fair market value of their services.

After checking its records, Shire said it paid $2,000 to Luby in 2004, plus a $19 in travel expenses.* J&J did not respond to a message requesting comment.

Luby is not the only academic researcher whose disclosure of Big Pharma funding has been spotty. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, is pushing for transparency legislation that would force all university researchers to disclose their ties to drug companies.

A selection of Luby’s published papers on childhood depression shows that while in 2006 she did disclose her payments from drug companies, in 2007 she did not. In an article titled “Psychotropic Prescriptions in a Sample Including Both Healthy and Mood and Disruptive Disordered Preschoolers,” in the Journal of Child and Adolesent Psychopharmacology, Luby’s disclosure statement said:

The authors do not have any corporate, commercial, or financial relationships that pose conflicts of interest.

Also in 2007, Luby signed as an author to a “Special Communication” in the same journal written by a group of child psychiatrists called The Preschool Psychopharmacology Working Group. The purpose of their group, Luby and her colleagues wrote, was:

… to promote responsible treatment of young children, recognizing that this will sometimes involve the use of medications.

The other authors of that paper disclosed a wealth of company ties, including Eli Lilly, Organon, Forest Labs, GlaxoSmithKline, Wyeth-Ayerst, McNeil, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Sepracor, Cephalon, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Janssen. Regarding Luby, the paper said:

The other authors have no financial relationships to disclose.

In Luby’s 2009 editorial, she wrote:

The need for large-scale and focused studies of this issue is underscored by the high and increasing rates of prescriptions of atypical antipsychotics and other mood stabilizing agents for preschool children with presumptive clinical diagnosis of bipolar disorder.

She cited a paper by Harvard’s Dr. Joseph Biederman, who was subpoenaed by federal prosecutors investigating J&J’s promotion of Risperdal, much of which was allegedly off-label to children. Separately, hundreds of lawsuits have been filed alleging that Seroquel has dangerous side effects such as weight gain and diabetes.

*Correction: Shire originally said it had no contact with Luby in the prior two years.

  • UPDATE: Philip Dawdy of Furious Seasons has more on Luby’s disclosure issues here and here.

Hat tip to Martha Rosenberg.

Jim Edwards, a former managing editor of Adweek, has covered drug marketing at Brandweek for four years, and is a former Knight-Bagehot fellow at Columbia University's business and journalism schools. Follow him on Twitter or send him an email.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Newer Antipsychotic Drugs Raise Fatal Heart Attack Risk

    NaturalNews - 270 days 10 hours 5 minutes ago

    (NaturalNews) The highly popular class of drugs known as atypical antipsychotics may significantly increase a patient's risk of suffering from a fatal heart attack, according to a new study conducted by researchers from the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine. Antipsychotic drugs are designed to treat schizophrenia, but are often prescribed...

  • AGP to Probe Undisclosed Industry Ties of Doc Who Recommends Antidepressants for 3-Year-Olds

    BNET Pharma - 73 days 1 hour 45 minutes ago

    The journal Archives of General Psychiatry will "look into" whether an author who recommended antidepressants for preschoolers failed to disclose

  • Snoring linked to depression/anxiety symptoms in preschoolers

    Virtual Medical Centre - 222 days 17 hours 16 minutes ago

    10 Apr 2009 Preschool-aged children who snore have more symptoms of depression and anxiety, as well as impairments in attention and language skills, reports a study in the April issue of the Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. "The results of our study bring out snoring as a possible risk factor for mood problems and cognitive...

  • DSP sees bipolar depression as another major opportunity for lurasidone

    Scrip News - 157 days 1 hour 59 minutes ago

    Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma (DSP) is planning to make a US submission for its atypical antipsychotic lurasidone for the additional indication of bipolar depression in 2011. A US filing is already scheduled early next year for the

  • BMS - Abilify: marketing blues

    PharmaGossip - 201 days 4 hours 21 minutes ago

    A 38-state coalition has launched an investigation into Bristol-Myers Squibb for alleged violations of state consumer protection laws with regard to the marketing of the atypical antipsychotic Abilify (aripiprazole), which is marketed by BMS/Otsuka. Elsewhere, the clinical trials cited as evidence of Abilify's power to vanquish depression have...

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Mppd

    09/24/09 | Report as spam

    RE: UPDATED: Doc Who Urged Antipsychotics for 3-Year-Olds Funded by J&J, AZ and Shire

    This article really struck me as exaggerated and distorted in service of an attempt to conjure a story where there was none. This would not be so bothersome, (aside from what I'm sure is a cruel disservice to Luby and Geller), except for the fact that it raises the noise level among watch dog organizations, including yours, against big Pharma intrusions.

    The research that you, and now Dawdy, cite, (at least based on the link you provide), is overwhelmingly about what appears to be diligent efforts to diagnose early predictors of adult depression. I gather that you share concerns for the diagnosis and treatment of depression which, like many other mental and physiological conditions, has meaningful markers at a young age.

    It seems like a gross distortion of its intent to characterize the research you reference as a recommendation for any specific treatment, which I don't think anyone with a medical degree would offer uniformly. Then the notion that people who spent maybe 15 years of training in pursuit of a generally noble profession can be bought for a $2000 fee and $19 travel expense seems ridiculous. Years of research routed by a trinket? If I had to endorse every vendor who ever gave me a speaking fee or other gratuity, I wouldn't be left with a single opinion.

    I noticed this story while tracking some recent controversies about drug treatments for young children, (psychological and otherwise). Drugging a child seems tantamount to beating a puppy, so anyone engaged with that delicate age group is suspect. It's more productive however to cite findings that have really been diverted by Pharma money instead of grasping for scandal in genuine research. I'm hope that your efforts and that of others who battle this influence can preserve their credibility by focusing on real violations.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement