About Pharma Industry

BNET Pharma provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about major manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and medicine. In addition to detailed drug company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new partnerships, drug patents and products, cost management, investments, pharmaceutical related lawsuits, and a host of other important business issues.

More Zyprexa Trouble for Lilly as Insurers Want Money Too

By Jim Edwards | Jan 21, 2009

Eli Lilly still faces a ton of legal action on its Zyprexa mismarketing, despite having paid a $1.4 billion settlement recently to state prosecutors and a separate $1.2 billion to settle individual patient plaintiffs.

That leaves insurance companies, who believe they were defrauded out of money when Lilly persuaded doctors to prescribe Zyprexa for patients they should not have  — so called “off-label” use. Here’s AmLaw Daily:

There’s another, more complicated suit before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, this one involving insurance companies and other third-party providers who claim they overpaid for Zyprexa prescriptions written by doctors swayed by Lilly’s false marketing of the drug. (The Food and Drug Administration has approved the drug for use only by patients suffering from schizophrenia and serious bipolar disorder.) On Friday the Second Circuit announced that it would review whether that suit is valid, and drug law experts are watching very, very closely.

The issue at stake is whether insurance companies can claim even though they were not the targets of Lilly’s fraud:

The decision didn’t resolve whether a third party with money at stake (such as an insurance provider) could sue an allegedly fraudulent marketer if its complaint is based on a different group (prescribing doctors) making decisions based on the illegal marketing. In other words, can insurance companies sue Lilly even though Lilly didn’t market Zyprexa directly to them?

In theory, judges could rule that some doctors decided to prescribe Zyprexa because they thought it would work, not because they fell for some allegedly fraudulent marketing campaign.

At least one judge is sympathetic to the opposite theory, that third-parties can be defrauded.

There’s a great back story on the whistleblower at the center of this case here.

Jim Edwards, a former managing editor of Adweek, has covered drug marketing at Brandweek for four years, and is a former Knight-Bagehot fellow at Columbia University's business and journalism schools. Follow him on Twitter or send him an email.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Insurers still pressing Lilly on Zyprexa

    Fierce Pharma - 305 days 15 hours 28 minutes ago

    Eli Lilly still faces legal action on its Zyprexa mismarketing, despite having paid a $1.4 billion settlement recently to state prosecutors and a separate $1.2 billion to settle with individual patient plaintiffs. What's left? Insurers. Report More information about formatting options

  • Lilly to pay $1.4B in Zyprexa settlement

    Fierce Pharma - 312 days 14 hours 20 minutes ago

    The long rumored settlement between Eli Lilly and the Department of Justice is a done deal. The drugmaker will pay $1.4 billion to take care of claims that it promoted its antipsychotic med Zyprexa overzealously. As part of the arrangement, Lilly will plead guilty to one misdemeanor violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Lilly had been...

  • In Zyprexa Settlement, Lilly Fritters Away 12 Percent of Revenues

    BNET Pharma - 312 days 13 hours 22 minutes ago

    Eli Lilly is close to settling criminal and civil charges related to its mismarketing of Zyprexa for $1.4 billion, the New York Times reports. The settlement will mean that Lilly will have disgorged $4.5 billion in charges, mostly for Zyprexa, since 2006. That’s about 12 percent of its revenues over the period. The settlement will close...

  • Lilly Reaches Zyprexa Settlement

    Wall Street Journal - 312 days 3 hours 49 minutes ago

    Eli Lilly agreed to pay $1.42 billion in a settlement with federal prosecutors regarding allegations of improperly marketing its antipsychotic drug Zyprexa

  • Lilly - Zyprexa: "How does a company defend itself after pleading guilty?"

    PharmaGossip - 299 days 27 minutes ago

    Eli Lilly & Co., after pleading guilty and agreeing to spend more than $2.6 billion to settle government and individual claims over its antipsychotic Zyprexa, still faces lawsuits over the drug that might cost the company another $2 billion. Not part of the settlements were suits by 12 states and a class-action case brought by pension funds,...

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Daniel Haszard

    01/21/09 | Report as spam

    RE: More Zyprexa Trouble for Lilly as Insurers Want Money Too

    Eli Lilly Zyprexa claims being stonewalled


    Where is the $1.42 billion Eli Lily Zyprexa settlement going as many victim claimants haven't been paid yet? It's the largest pharma-fraud-whistleblower case in US history.

    Eli Lilly, the Indy-based pharmaceutical company pleads guilty to promoting Zyprexa for unapproved uses and is slapped with $1.4 billion criminal fine, the largest ever placed on a U.S. company.

    Eli Lilly promotes sales of their #1 drug (Zyprexa $4.8 billion per year) that can *cause* diabetes and then turns around and makes billions selling more drugs to treat the diabetes.
    Eli Lilly's # 1 cash cow Zyprexa has been over-prescribed and linked to a 10-times greater risk of causing type #2 diabetes and increased risk of heart attack.

    "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

    I believe that I am the world's most vigorous Zyprexa claimant having posted more than 68,000 web pages.

    It ain't over. I will be costing Lilly lots more $$$.
    They have three certified letters from me substantiating my claim. I am a classic case for compensation having taken the stuff for four years (for off-label PTSD). I paid thousands of dollars out of my own pocket in co-payments for the Zyprexa which gave me sudden onset diabetes in 2000 with a deadly A1C of 14.2 all documented at my site.

    Eli Lilly has up to 250 lawyers just on their payroll in Indy; they have NEVER contacted me except in 2005 to get a release of my medical records. My doctor says, (get this) they never contacted him to verify the information.
    There must be millions out there harmed by this drug.

    Daniel Haszard http://www.zyprexa-victims.com

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement