About Technology Industry

BNET Technology provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about all aspects of the high-tech industry. In addition to detailed tech company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new mergers and acquisitions, tech products, investments, patents, and a host of other important technology related business issues.

Microsoft Mud Won't Stick To Google

By Michael Hickins | Jun 17, 2009

Alternate: Google's wave crashing down on MicrosoftMicrosoft is trying to discredit Google’s enterprise push by highlighting a bug that probably affects fewer users than there are Democrats in the state of Utah.

The issue revolves around a new feature introduced by Google allowing customers to switch to Google email and productivity applications while retaining the popular Microsoft Outlook front-end client. As I recently noted, many corporate users are loathe to give up Outlook, which integrates calendar, appointment and contact features with email, and the new Outlook sync allows enterprises to adopt much less expensive tools without ruffling feathers.

The feature doesn’t pose a significant threat to Microsoft in and of itself, but add this convenience to the price comparison between a $50 per user cost and the cost of the Microsoft Exchange, Office and PowerPoint stack in the current environment, and you see the beginnings of a serious impact on Microsoft’s dominance. Put this together with the growth in market share of the Android operating system (for laptops as well as smartphones), the sharp rise in adoption of Google’s Chrome browser and the growing dominance of Web-based business software, and you have the makings of a veritable avalanche rushing Microsoft’s way.

It may not be obvious to everyone, including my colleague Erik Sherman, but it sure as heck is obvious, and ominous, to Microsoft, which was quick to pull the alarm bell of “a serious bug / flaw with the recently announced Google Apps Sync for Microsoft Outlook.”

The flaw in question is that the sync feature prevents Microsoft’s desktop search from indexing and searching Outlook data. When’s the last time you used Microsoft’s desktop search? Wait — let me rephrase that. When’s the last time you even heard about Microsoft’s desktop search? I’d venture to say it was somewhere between 2003 and never. Until now, with Microsoft trying to pull the emergency brake on a subway train that has left it in the station.

The trouble with this mud-slinging (and Microsoft’s blatantly insincere offer to help Google “find a resolution for our mutual customers” — please pass me the barf bag) is that there’s no surprise here. As all enterprise software vendors, Google provides a full list of bugs and other issues in an FAQ for IT administrators — the only difference being that Google’s is much shorter than most — and most certainly shorter than Microsoft’s.

Microsoft will try to gas-bag as much mileage as it can out of this, but the issue itself is as insignificant as the wave pattern caused by Microsoft’s pebble. Erik writes that the bug issue is “another example of how far Google has to go to turn itself into a vendor that enterprises can trust.” I see it as another example of little sleep Microsoft executives are getting as they contemplate the Google Wave crashing down upon them.

[Image source: Wikimedia Commons]

Michael Hickins is a professional writer and journalist with a passion for ferreting out the intersections between technology and culture.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Does Google Apps break Microsoft Outlook? Not anymore

    VentureBeat - 146 days 9 hours 18 minutes ago

    Those of you who get uncomfortable around confrontations and arguments may be able to breathe a little easier now — it looks like Google has resolved a recent spat between the search giant and Microsoft peaceably, with a bug fix. The trouble started when Google announced that it was allowing users of its Google Apps bundle of online tools to...

  • Google unveils plug-in to marry Outlook, Gmail

    Computerworld - 167 days 7 hours 44 minutes ago

    Google Tuesday unveiled synchronization technology that supports Microsoft Outlook as the front end to Gmail, giving users an option to scrap Exchange on the back end while allowing users to keep their familiar desktop client. Google Apps Sync for Microsoft Outlook provides synchronization for e-mail, calendar and contacts between Gmail and...

  • Google Apps Takes Swipe At Microsoft

    WebProNews - 167 days 8 hours 39 minutes ago

    Not everyone likes change, and complaints are especially sure to occur when changes are forced upon people.  So a certain Mountain View-based search giant, while still pushing its products as replacements for Redmond's offerings, is trying to bridge the gap with Google Apps Sync for Microsoft Outlook. A post on the Official Google Enterprise...

  • Google's Outlook interface a weak nod to corporate reality

    Computerworld - 165 days 7 hours 28 minutes ago

    While Google is in hot pursuit of an enterprise e-mail business, the announced support this week for Outlook as a client interface for Gmail does little to distinguish the vendor from other players chasing top-dog Microsoft. Google last week unveiled Google Apps Sync for Microsoft Outlook, synchronization technology that supports Outlook as the...

  • Google App Sync Guns For Microsoft Exchange

    Information Week - 167 days 7 hours 23 minutes ago

    The stance was very apparent during a media event in San Francisco on Tuesday, where Google's enterprise group assembled a group of technology journalists and presented an update on its enterprise business. function showDesc(img) { var element = document.getElementById("videoBoxDisplayAreaText"); if(element) element.innerHTML = img.alt; };...

Links from the Web Buzz:
 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    ErikSherman

    06/17/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Microsoft Mud Won't Stick To Google

    Michael, of coure Microsoft will try to make mileage out of this. But what you're missing is the real problem: that Google didn't have the experience with corporate customers or relatively bullet proof commercial software development they want to find even this glaring an error. By releasing a product with this big a flaw, they showed their fundamental misunderstanding of the enterprise market. As a Google Apps administrator on another post of yours noted, the company's support is terrible. When support is bad and QA is apparently laughable, charging "only" $50 a customer continues the joke. The short-term savings isn't worth CIOs betting their jobs. I'm not saying that Google couldn't compete in this market, as you're suggesting. What I am saying is that unless it learns what the customers want and the rules of the game, it's going to keep tripping over its feet.

  •  
    2

    Michael Hickins

    06/18/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Microsoft Mud Won't Stick To Google

    Hi Erik,
    I do get your point, but you seem to be missing mine. The cost of email + Office + SharePoint is not trivial by any means, which is why companies like Prudential, Fairchild Semiconductor and Cap Gemini are piloting or have full-blown Google Apps as replacements for the Microsoft stack. CIOs aren't risking their jobs by switching -- they're risking their jobs by not at least considering a switch. And the real joke is to maintain that Microsoft hasn't released umpteen buggy products to the enterprise (which in many cases it hasn't owned up to until it was forced to do so). Google has probably even won converts in the enterprise simply by being refreshingly upfront about this bug.

  •  
    3

    ErikSherman

    06/18/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Microsoft Mud Won't Stick To Google

    Michael, I do get your point. But according to all the analyses I've seen over decades, the real costs in technology are never the up-front hardware and software licensing, but the massive expenses in support, infrastructure, training, change in business processes, and so on. If Google Apps really were "ready for prime time" and the licensing costs so painful, you'd be able to point to a long list of major adoptors who made wholesale changes. Google would be making far more than $200M to $300M. But you can't and they aren't because so far the companies haven't. CIOs and CEOs have been voting with their absense that a world sitting on Google simply isn't steady enough for them.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement