About Technology Industry

BNET Technology provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about all aspects of the high-tech industry. In addition to detailed tech company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new mergers and acquisitions, tech products, investments, patents, and a host of other important technology related business issues.

Separating SAP From Chaff

By Michael Hickins | Jun 26, 2009

Dennis Howlett's analysis

My recent post accusing Oracle of lying about its chief rival was close enough to the mark to get under Oracle’s skin. Still, it had some holes I couldn’t fill, not least of which because of different reporting periods for the two companies. But if I had half the accounting skills of my colleague at ZDNet, Dennis Howlett, I could have done a better job of proving my point. I shall endeavor to learn at the master’s feet.

At issue, Oracle took a largely specious shot at SAP, contending in the press release accompanying its earnings report this week that it “took market share from SAP in every region around the world.” My point, however awkwardly expressed, was that Oracle is comparing its entire revenue to that of SAP, while the companies don’t actually compete in all areas; the numbers, which don’t lie, show that Oracle’s growth is fueled chiefly by database and middleware, not business applications, which is the only area where the two companies compete.

Dennis does a great job of lining up the earnings reports of SAP and Oracle to create more of an apples-to-apples comparison, and concludes, “the revenue patterns look remarkably similar. SAP dipped more sharply at Q3 than Oracle but accelerated faster in Q4.” Moreover,

Oracle’s Q4 results represent two-thirds of as yet unannounced Q2 earnings for SAP on my basis for comparison. Also remember that while the percentages look starkly different, Oracle is assuming that its only competition is SAP. That’s simply not true. Neither is the converse.

In her comments to my post, Oracle’s Karen Tillman suggested the gap between Oracle and SAP’s numbers would be even more “dramatic” if I stripped revenue from Business Objects, acquired by SAP almost two years ago, out of its reported revenues. She didn’t suggest, however, that I strip out revenues from applications vendors acquired by Oracle, including, as Dennis notes as well, PeopleSoft, Siebel, JD Edwards, and Hyperion (also acquired two years ago).

[Image credit: Dennis Howlett of ZDNet]

Michael Hickins is a professional writer and journalist with a passion for ferreting out the intersections between technology and culture.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • SaaS BI vendor LucidEra’s demise harkens to ASP downfalls

    TechTarget - 151 days 10 hours 38 minutes ago

    When my inbox began filling up with all the theories of why BI SaaS vendor LucidEra is expected to close down by months end, I couldnt help thinking that the more things change (in name, at least), the more they stay the same. LucidEra is in part a victim of a down economy, just as application service providers (ASPs) were in the...

  • What the NYT and Slate Don’t Seem to Understand About Behavior Change

    The Decision Tree - 59 days 16 hours 31 minutes ago

    Two articles posted online got under my skin this morning, and I just couldn’t resist giving my two cents. First, Tara Parker-Pope, of the New York Times says: Most obesity researchers now agree that metabolic differences, not willpower, are the driving forces behind weight and appetite control. Studies suggest that an imbalance of brain...

  • The Axed Hack's Guide to Flacking: Are Journalists Meant For PR?

    The Bad Pitch Blog - 41 days 16 hours 46 minutes ago

    I'll get right to the point: PR is not the dark side any more. As a reporter for a plethora of publications in the hard-to-remember '80s, I do recall titters from my colleagues when I defected to PR. I had to make more money and I couldn't cope with holier-than-thou editors. I'd written for USA Today, New York Daily News, New York Times,...

  • How To Spot Social Media Snake Oil

    Logic+Emotion - 67 days 4 hours 47 minutes ago

    Recently colleague Peter Kim and myself found ourselves in close contact with a "social media expert". The problem is this expert was sucking in the feed of my blog without permission, attribution and had more holes in his resume than

  • 12seconds Lays An iPhone Video Messenger On Top Of Twitter’s Social Graph

    Tech Crunch - 134 days 9 hours 42 minutes ago

    12seconds has had an iPhone app for a while now. Unfortunately, it was fairly crippled because iPhones couldn't shoot video, so you had to take still pictures and make 12 second collages. Now, with the iPhone 3GS you can shoot video . And so 12seconds is making its app a whole lot better. Unveiled today at our Real-Time Stream CrunchUp event,...

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    AbridgedMind

    06/28/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Separating SAP From Chaff

    Can't imagine siding with Oracle on anything, but on the narrow point about the impact of revenue from Business Objects, I have to. SAP's last quarter does include some inorganic growth from BO. Oracle's last quarter does not, or at least not from Siebel, PeopleSoft, J.D. Edwards, and Hyperion, because they all closed long enough ago. That said, Oracle has done a bunch of smaller apps related acquisitions that are providing some inorganic growth, but many of the recent deals have been smaller private companies making it nearly impossible to back them out of Oracle's figures.

    So what is Oracle boasting? In its most recent quarter it reported new license revenue in its apps business was down by 19%. In SAP's last reported quarter it reported Software revenue down 33%. Oracle wins. But add maintenance and support into the most recent quarter, and SAP wins. Or look just at license/software revenue over the last year, SAP wins again. More here: http://bit.ly/2q7pS1

  •  
    2

    karen.tillman2@...

    06/29/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Separating SAP From Chaff

    Hi Michael - It's not wrong that SAP includes Business Objects (and presumably NeTWeaver) in their applications sales revenue. The point I am trying to make is that we don't include Hyperion in our apps numbers. See the difference?

    Also, it's not that you came "close to the mark" the elicited my response. It's that I believe you didn't portray the entire picture.

  •  
    3

    vascruggs

    06/29/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Separating SAP From Chaff

    I am currently an unemployed IT professional, and in my search for a job, I see a lot more openings for people with SAP skills than for PeopleSoft, et al. I just did some single keyword searches on Monster.com. The results: SAP, 4135 openings; PeopleSoft, 1207; JD Edwards, 33; Siebel, 487. Knowing the Dice.com is "the career hub for tech insiders," I ran the same searches - results: SAP, 3180; PeopleSoft, 1128; JD Edwards, 227; Siebel, 641. While not "scientific," I think these results show where the market demand is.

  •  
    4

    Michael Hickins

    06/29/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Separating SAP From Chaff

    Hi Karen,
    Thanks for responding... I do understand your point (which was news to me). That said, there are yet more numbers to belie the idea that Oracle is taking share from SAP (these are all full-year numbers from SAP's latest 10-K):
    - number of customers went from 46K to 82K (+77%);
    - software and software-related service revenues +16%
    - net income +13.7%
    - and to vascruggs' point, headcount +17.5%.
    I'm not sure I see Oracle doing a lot of damage here.
    That said, I'd be more than happy to talk and get a fuller picture, but for that to happen your team would have to answer my calls or something magical.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here