About Technology Industry

BNET Technology provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about all aspects of the high-tech industry. In addition to detailed tech company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new mergers and acquisitions, tech products, investments, patents, and a host of other important technology related business issues.

Does It Matter Who Wins the Browser Wars?

By Erik Sherman | Sep 2, 2009

There was a time when browser wars grabbed the attention of everyone following the tech sector, with the struggle between Netscape and Microsoft. These days, the struggle goes on but with a much larger field. My colleague Michael Hickins sees Chrome as aggressively advancing, showing that Google understands the needs to be on all desktops. However, I’d have to disagree on two counts. First, Chome still has a miniscule portion of market share. Second, given the emerging structure of computing, does it really matter any more?

According to browser market share numbers released by Net Applications, last month Internet Explorer had a 66.97 percent piece of the pie, down from 73.64 percent in October 2008. In January, IE had 69.72 percent. So it’s definitely trending down, though at a rate that it will take years to lose control. Who’s winning most of the market share? Firefox, which has gone from just under 20 percent in October 2008 to almost 23 percent last month. Here’s the Net Applications graph:

Chrome went from 1 percent on its release to 2.84 percent — an improvement, but hardly anything suggesting that the world is panting in wait for an OS based on Linux and using Chrome as a front end. (By the way, although Michael notes that Google claims having lined up a number of vendors ready to release systems using Chrome, most of those vendors immediately and noticeably distanced themselves from the statement.) Safari climbed from 2.87 percent to 4.07 percent, while Opera lost slightly, going from 2.12 percent to 2.04 percent. But the more I think about it, the more I wonder whether it has any importance. Consider a few things:

  • No one makes money off browsers, because they all have to be free, although Google probably looks to a future of delivering advertising via a browser.
  • Given the trends, what seems likely in the mid-term is a computing world dominated by IE and Firefox.
  • It ultimately doesn’t matter what browser someone runs.

That last point is the big one. People have their preferences, but that is in an area that doesn’t make money. How do you make money in computing? Delivering services. But the delivery of services is slowly becoming unbound from the provision of desktop software. What is going to matter is not who controls an outbound window designed to global standards they don’t control, but who controls the inbound systems that deliver the services. We are seeing a switch from desktop- to cloud-centric computing. From that view, all browser market share offers is bragging rights, but nothing that cements a business position.

Image via stock.xchng user memoossa, site standard license.

Erik Sherman is a freelance journalist whose work has appeared in Newsweek, the New York Times Magazine, Technology Review, the Financial Times, Chief Executive, and other publications. Follow him on Twitter.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • When It Comes To Search, Bundling Bing In IE Barely Gives It An Advantage

    Tech Crunch - 90 days 19 hours 54 minutes ago

    Back in the 1990s during the original browser wars between Netscape and Internet Explorer, one of Microsoft's chief weapons was the ability to bundle IE into Windows as the default browser. With bundling came market share, or so the government argued in its antitrust case against Redmond. Fast forward to today's search wars. You'd think that...

  • Since March, Internet Explorer Lost 11.4 Percent Share To Firefox, Safari, And Chrome

    Tech Crunch - 141 days 22 hours 45 minutes ago

    The new browser wars on on. More than a decade after Microsoft killed off Netscape with Internet Explorer, competition in the browser market has never been stronger. Just last week , Mozilla released Firefox 3.5 , which has now been downloaded nearly 14 million times. Earlier in June , Apple released Safari 4 . In March, Microsoft introduced

  • Mobile Browser Wars

    Information Week - 285 days 20 hours 56 minutes ago

    Well, maybe just browser skirmishes. Certainly nothing like the browser wars on the desktop when Netscape and Microsoft duked it out for supremacy in the late 1990's. There are a surprising number of third party browsers for mobile devices. Opera has the Opera Mobile browser for Windows Mobile and UIQ. This is a full blown browser that installs...

  • Musing About Another Browser, With a Famous Backer [Voices]

    Wall Street Journal - 102 days 8 hours 45 minutes ago

    Marc Andreessen’s name is not quite the household word in Silicon Valley it was in the mid-1990s, when he was a wunderkind at Netscape Communications fighting the browser wars against mighty Microsoft (MSFT). Still, the idea he might get involved in the same market more than a decade later is an intriguing thought. A person familiar with...

  • Microsoft should dig into the WebKit to stop Google from framing IE

    BetaNews - 61 days 20 hours 25 minutes ago

    By Joe Wilcox , Betanews Internet Explorer is in a state of crisis so severe that Microsoft may yet lose most of the browser market territory claimed during the browser wars. Microsoft has no choice but to make a leap of development faith, by abandoning the IE rendering engine and releasing new WebKit-based desktop and mobile browsers. IE...

Links from the Web Buzz:
 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Gary Edwards

    09/02/09 | Report as spam

    The Future of the Open Web

    You're right that the browser wars do not matter - except for
    this point of demarcation; browsers that support HTML+ and
    browser that support 1998 HTML.

    Not all Web services and applications support HTML+, the
    rapidly advancing set of technologies that includes HTML5,
    CSS3, SVG/Canvas, and JavaScript (including the libraries and
    JSON).

    Microsoft has chosen to draw the Open Web line at what
    amounts to 1998-2001 level of HTML/CSS. Above that line,
    they provision a rich-client / rich-server Web model bound to
    the .NET-WPF platform where C#, Silverlight, and XAML are
    very prominent. Noticeably, Open Web standards are for the
    most part replaced at this richer MSWeb level by proprietary
    technologies.

    Through limited support for HTML/CSS, IE8 itself acts to dumb
    down the Open Web. The effect of this is that business
    systems and day-to-day workflow processes bound to the
    ubiquitous and very "rich" MSOffice Productivity Environment
    have little choice when it comes to transitioning to the Web
    but to stay on the Microsoft 2010 treadmill. Sure, at some
    point legacy business processes and systems will be rewritten
    to the Web. The question is, will it be the Open Web or the
    MS-Web?

    The Open Web standards are the dividing line between owning
    your information and content, or, having that content bound to
    a Web platform comprised of proprietary Microsoft services,
    systems and applications.

    Web designers and developers are still caught up in the
    browser wars. They worry incessantly as to how to dumb
    down Web content and services to meet the limited
    functionality of IE. This sucks. So everyone continues to
    watch "the browser wars" stats. What they are really
    watching for though is that magic moment where "combined"
    HTML+ browser uptake in marketshare signals that they can
    start to implement highly graphical and collaboratively
    interactive HTML+ specific content.

    Meanwhile, the greater Web is at a standstill. Except for one
    extraordinary phenomenon - the iPhone. Marketshare matters,
    and the iPhone is leading a WebKit wave of HTML+ activity
    that Web designers and developers can't ignore or need "dumb
    down". This is not a "greater Web" phenomenon though. Not
    yet anyway. But it is an "edge of the Web" phenom that
    cannot be ignored.

    The Open Web HTML+ capabilities of the iPhone and WebKit
    change everything. Add up the marketshare of ALL HTML+
    capable browsers, including the Smartphone and Netbook
    systems, and you'll see that we're not stuck in 1998 anymore.

    More importantly, the edge of the Web where these WebKit
    devices rule is slowly but surely teasing and even forcing
    HTML+ on the greater Web.

    Think about it. What matters most to Web designers and
    developers? Dumbing down to IE8? Or, accommodating the
    crush of WebKit smartphones, netbooks, eBooks and soon
    tablets seeking access to information, content and services?
    Easier i think to advise a download of Chrome to a Windows
    desktop than get dusted by competitors racing to reach the
    explosion taking place at the edge of the Web.

    Microsoft is betting that a Silverlight plug-in designed for MS
    specific rich business content will trump the Open Web richness
    of HTML+. IMHO though, i think they lost this battle when,
    back in March of 2009, they showed up empty handed at the
    Barcelona World Mobility Conference. OEM's having to compete
    with the iPhone can't afford to wait on Microsoft - even though
    the Winmo phones will have a business systems advantage of
    being able to "integrate" with legacy desktop systems and the
    MS-Webstack juggernaut (Exchange/SharePoint/Collab Server).

    Notably, the Barcelona Conference was followed by a rush to
    Google Android and iPhone application development. Apple
    didn't even bother to show up, and they still dominated the
    entire show!

    Microsoft has lost the battle to control the Web's document
    model. Because of iPhone, WebKit, and the Mozilla-Opera
    embrace of HTML+, the Open Web is looking very secure these
    days. What's missing from the Open Web is the transition of
    those business systems bound to existing MSOffice Productivity
    Environments. And i'm not so sure the HTML+ browsers or
    HTML+ Web designers and developers can solve that problem.
    And therein lies the rub.

    Microsoft may well own the transition path for moving
    existing/legacy client/server business systems to the Web.
    They and they alone are in a position to re-purpose
    the MSOffice Productivity Environment to connect to an
    emerging MS-Webstack centered productivity environment.
    Challengers to Microsoft are left with the daunting challenge of
    "replacing" the MSOffice Productivity Environment.
    Which is very costly and disruptive.

    This predicament could of course result in a "breaking of the
    Web"
    . Possibly with Google dominating a
    "consumer" oriented HTML+ Open Web side. And
    Microsoft dominating a MS platform specific "business
    Web"
    .

    You want a war? There it is. The Open Web vs. Microsoft.
    With vast numbers of business desktops and client/server
    systems caught in the balance. As for consumers? Done deal.
    Most of the Open Web is free.

    ~ge~

  •  
    2

    conlad

    09/03/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Does It Matter Who Wins the Browser Wars?

    Hi Gary, thanks for that technically rich insight!

    I'll then just want to back that yes, the browser matters, and it will matter even more as things are moved into the cloud. Gary mentioned that legacy systems are designed to exclusively run on MS and IE, but with the cloud phenomenon there's a big chance for these systems to be, literally, exchanged for Cloud equivalents. And in that moment is where the jump to things like Wave can tip the balance around.

    Also, with more and more apps running entirely in your browser, do you really think IE can handle it? stability and functionality found in other browsers will win the day, specially as they effectively make the jump to the new platforms (gary listed them - smartphones, netbooks, tablets, etc).

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here