advertisement
White Papers, Webcasts, and Resources
About Technology Industry

BNET Technology provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about all aspects of the high-tech industry. In addition to detailed tech company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new mergers and acquisitions, tech products, investments, patents, and a host of other important technology related business issues.

Verizon Ad Campaign Benefits the Carrier, Motorola, Hurts Apple, AT&T

By Erik Sherman | Nov 25, 2009

Verizon’s ad campaign bashing AT&T and, in the process, the partner-it-would-have, Apple, has benefited Verizon and Droid manufacturer Motorola in specific age and gender sets, according to YouGov, which produces the BrandIndex measure of relative brand strength. But whether that’s enough to cause a big hurt, or even long-term shift in the balance of power, is up in the air.

Back in mid-October, right after Verizon started running its Droid ads, YouGov asked 18- to 34-year-olds whether they would recommend Verizon or AT&T to a friend:

Verizon received a rating of 8.3, while AT&T received a 1.4. A few days later, the carriers were approximately tied around a rating of 10, but from there, customer ratings of Verizon began to soar, while those for AT&T dropped.Around Nov. 5, AT&T’s overall rating was approximately -8, while Verizon hovered near 28. BrandIndex says it interviews 5,000 people each day, and that its margin of error is plus or minus 2 percent.

The scores indicate a relative positioning, with higher positive scores being better.

And then the ads taking potshots at AT&T’s 3G network started and, ultimately, AT&T tried to retaliate. The apparent result was improved standing for Motorola at the apparent expense of AT&T and Apple. I don’t have the original report and must confess to be a little leery about the way AppleInsider has reported it because it points to an 18 plus segment of men, which is broader than YouGov or other market researchers generally split out age groups. I would have expected 18 to 34 again, but given the early hour at which I write, reaching YouGov’s New York office for clarification is out of the question.

So for the moment let’s go with the report as AppleInsider summarizes it. Apple’s brand dropped from a peak of 48.1 in November down to 22, a number that Motorola beat by more than ten points, showing that the latter is benefiting from the ad wars:

“Motorola has seen its brand loyalty unaffected by AT&T’s lawsuits against Verizon Wireless and ad war bashing,” YouGov said. “But it seems to have taken a toll on Blackberry, which has withered under all the Droid/iPhone marketing and hype.”

I’ll be checking with YouGov to see how the numbers for Verizon and AT&T have stacked up since the prior report. Also, the latest data came before the Apple ads touting how users could talk and be online at the same time, so there may be some backlash yet to come. And given the talk between Verizon and Apple about carrying the iPhone, there are all sorts of other implications that could play a role.

Erik Sherman is a freelance journalist whose work has appeared in Newsweek, the New York Times Magazine, Technology Review, the Financial Times, Chief Executive, and other publications. Follow him on Twitter.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Apple's latest TV ads defend AT&T

    ZDNet - 78 days 7 hours 49 minutes ago

    It seems that Apple is jumping into the AT&T vs. Verizon battle royale that has been playing out on television sets and computer screens everywhere. In case you’ve been living under a rock Verizon has been publicly trashing the AT&T 3G network in the United States and AT&T sued, lost, then released a response ad to counter the Verizon claims....

  • AT&T Responds to Verizon’s “Blatantly False and Misleading” Ads

    Mashable - 89 days 4 hours 46 minutes ago

    The war of words between Verizon and AT&T continues. In case you haven’t been following, it all started with Verizon’s “There’s a Map for That” ads mocking AT&T’s coverage. Recently, AT&T sued Verizon over the ads, but that didn’t stop the latter from continuing the campaign in a new holiday ad . Now, AT&T is out with a...

  • Ad war propels Verizon, AT&T in young adult customer awareness

    AppleInsider - 56 days 10 hours 39 minutes ago

    By Neil HughesPublished: 12:30 PM EST Both AT&T and Verizon have benefited from an ongoing advertising war between the two U.S. wireless providers, though a new study has found Verizon has seen greater gains.A study released this week by YouGov's BrandIndex found that the advertisements, lawsuits and publicity surrounding AT&T and Verizon have...

  • Verizon Responds to AT&T Suit: 'The Truth Hurts'

    PC Magazine - 84 days 13 hours 57 minutes ago

    Put another way: "AT&T did not file this lawsuit because Verizon's "There's A Map For That" advertisements are untrue; AT&T sued because Verizon's ads are true and the truth hurts," Verizon's memorandum of law said, filed in response to AT&T's TRO request. Verizon's motion was filed late Monday in a Georgia district court. On Nov. 3, AT&T sued...

  • AT&T Blasts Verizon With New Commercial (and the iPhone)

    Mashable - 83 days 2 hours 12 minutes ago

    AT&T may have lost the battle, but the war is not over. Of course we’re talking about all the hubbub over Verizon’s Map for That ads , which paint AT&T’s 3G network as inferior to Verizon’s. Verizon’s holiday ads stirred the pot even more, inflaming AT&T to file a lawsuit , which, as we found out earlier today, was not a...

Links from the Web Buzz:
 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Justa Notherguy

    11/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Verizon Ad Campaign Benefits the Carrier, Motorola, Hurts Apple, AT&T

    We must give credit where its due: Verizon Wireless' anti-AT&T ads are pure genius, especially the 'There's Map for That' and 'Misfit Toys' commercials. And, tho their Droid spots have been less so, still they seem to have been very effective at creating buzz and drawing consumer interest.

    As to the return volley(s) from AT&T, I'm unimpressed with the prosaic stuff I've seen, to date. Forget regaining points in the 3G feud; I wonder if they can even overcome the lingering effects of their own ham-fisted legal maneuvering...arguably, the most astonishing PR miscalculation of 2009.

  •  
    2

    ErikSherman

    11/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Verizon Ad Campaign Benefits the Carrier, Motorola, Hurts Apple, AT&T

    I argued a similar point last week: http://industry.bnet.com/technology/10004092/att-wish-to-distract-from-verizon-ads-could-backfire/. To my eye, AT&T would have had to work hard to be more self-damaging in its marketing. And how the heck do you make Verizon look like the honest underdog fighting off corporate spin? My head is still shaking in disbelief.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement