About Technology Industry

BNET Technology provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about all aspects of the high-tech industry. In addition to detailed tech company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new mergers and acquisitions, tech products, investments, patents, and a host of other important technology related business issues.

Does Apple Music Deal Mean Labels Are Learning?

By Erik Sherman | Jan 6, 2009

At its last MacWorld, Apple announced new lower pricing on some music in its iTunes store – and an end to digital rights management (DRM) on all tracks. Forget about the state of Steve Jobs or who gave the keynote address. This is real news, as it is yet another bit of information suggesting that perhaps the recording industry has finally come to grips with the new market realities.

Amazon’s 2008 top album seller was available for free downloadThis isn’t an Apple story because the company could not, on its own, end the practice because the music is owned by the recording companies. Only by convincing them to give up the protections they thought they wanted could Apple finally drop the shackles that kept music from being moved from one machine to another.

Heaven knows the evidence has been mounting that trying to restrict consumers was doing more economic harm than good. The Recording Industry Association of America has said that it plans to wind down its legal efforts to sue tens of thousands of individuals for copyright infringement. That doesn’t mean anything goes, but clearly intimidation hasn’t worked.

Nor has DRM. Those who want to illegally duplicate files have found ways to do so. The people really hamstrung by the technology have largely been consumers who only get annoyed and resentful. In the U.S., total album sales in 2008 fell by nearly 20 percent from the levels of 2007. But digital sales actually showed growth of 32 percent. People clearly want to cherry pick tracks they like and avoid having to pay additional amounts for the music that doesn’t interest them. Goodbye concept album.

Other numbers give at least anecdotal support. Amazon’s best selling downloadable album, Ghosts I-IV by Trent Reznor’s Nine Inch Nails, was actually available for free and legal downloads. Another top seller at Amazon, Radiohead’s In Rainbows, was available earlier in the year for download at whatever price people wanted to pay, even if that was free.

Trent Reznor himself questioned the viability of the ‘free’ music model earlier this year, but clearly, his own band has been able to make it work. While overall album sales were down last year (even when accounting for digital downloads), bands like the Nine Inch Nails have been able to leverage their fanbase and bypass the traditional music industry channels, while still making a profit.

And maybe that is the real issue. More and more, musicians can skip distribution –- and even the record labels themselves. For example, a profoundly talented and interesting musician in my area, Peter Blanchette, plays an intriguing array of music from Bach to themes from the Italian cinema on specially-designed guitars that have from 9 to 11 strings. You can’t get most of his music on Amazon.com, but you can at his site.

Blanchette is hardly the only musician taking this route. Others at all levels of fame are now broadly exploring what is possible in connecting directly to listeners. When customers are annoyed and musicians independent, commercial labels face the choice of becoming more amenable or being shown to the dust bin of history. Now the question is whether they are acting in time, or will it be too little, too late.

Erik Sherman is a freelance journalist whose work has appeared in Newsweek, the New York Times Magazine, Technology Review, the Financial Times, Chief Executive, and other publications. Follow him on Twitter.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • How To Watch Today's Macworld Keynote Live (AAPL)

    Silicon Alley Insider - 322 days 17 hours 28 minutes ago

    Apple marketing exec Phil Schiller will deliver Apple's (AAPL) final Macworld keynote today in San Francisco at 12 noon ET. We will be providing LIVE coverage and analysis from the Moscone Center. Check out our Macworld page for the latest. Expectations are low: Schiller is expected to show off new Mac mini computers and possibly Snow...

  • News to know: Macworld, CES preview, Windows 7

    ZDNet - 321 days 21 hours 28 minutes ago

    Macworld Coverage: Photos: Jobs fill-in touts media, MacBook updates Andrew Nusca: CES 2009: First impressions; CES Unveiled [Day 1] Gallery: CES gadgets - the first waveMatthew Miller: CES2009: HP announces Mini 2140 with Atom processor and moreMatthew Miller: CES2009: HTC announces S743/Rose with U.S. 3G support Adrian Kingsley-Hughes: Windows...

  • Macworld Keynote: Snoozefest (AAPL)

    Silicon Alley Insider - 322 days 12 hours 48 minutes ago

    With Steve Jobs on the sidelines, expectations were low for today's Macworld keynote. And Apple didn't surprise anyone. Marketing exec Phil Schiller showed off an updated MacBook Pro, announced some changes to iTunes, and unveiled new versions of the company's iLife and iWork software. But nothing new or terribly exciting, which will leave...

  • iTunes Goes DRM Free - But No Social Network Just Yet

    ReadWriteWeb - 322 days 12 hours 5 minutes ago

    At the Macworld 2009 keynote today, Apple announced that by the end of this quarter, all 10 million songs available on iTunes will be DRM free [Digital Rights Management]. As of today, 8 million songs will be DRM free, with the other 2 million done by end of Q1 09. This is long overdue, especially considering that Steve Jobs wrote an open...

  • Seven Post-Macworld Questions For Apple (AAPL)

    Silicon Alley Insider - 321 days 12 hours 48 minutes ago

    As usual, Apple's (AAPL) Macworld keynote led to more questions than answers. We learned about some of Apple's new products and services -- 17-inch MacBook, more DRM-free music at iTunes, new software suites -- but missed out on a lot more. Here's what we'd ask Steve Jobs or marketing exec Phil Schiller if we could. What's going on with...

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    tramky

    01/07/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Does Apple Music Deal Mean Labels Are Learning?

    It seems unclear to me that musicians can make much of a living producing a la carte music. And it also strikes me that a lot of music lovers--and music buyers--are loathe to spend the time on the Internet browsing all over hell & back to find music they like. Musicians who put their stuff on their own websites will NOT be found by many music buyers. But that's their choice. Perhaps it will work well enough for them, perhaps not.

  •  
    2

    haasker

    01/07/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Does Apple Music Deal Mean Labels Are Learning?

    It seems to have taken the proverbial 2x4 across the forehead, but I'm happy to see the industry is finally "getting" it. I'm an old timer, though, and I will miss the days of the concept album, and even those albums that only had one or two hit songs on them, but the rest of the album was good, too. Maybe it's just another opportunity for the industry to learn how to market differently to make sure they sell as many tracks from artists as possible. For instance, if I'd downloaded, and listened to only the one Allison Krause song my sister turned me onto awhile ago, rather than buy the album, I would NEVER have discovered how special she is, nor would I have ended up purchasing 5 more albums by her. The same is true of The Coors, 1 catchy, hit song led to multiple album purchases. So the industry will have to work to keep folks like me happy, that will want additional tracks, and not just satisfy the impulse purchase of a single track only.

  •  
    3

    Patrick DonEgan

    01/07/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Does Apple Music Deal Mean Labels Are Learning?

    The price per track is still WAY too high
    for the value received. I know millions of tracks have
    been sold, and will continue to be sold -
    but I still think that $0.25 is a much more appropriate
    price for 1 song of less than CD-Audio quality.

    When they get it down that low - then they will see
    a big chunk of the bootleggers changing their style.

  •  
    4

    Aristo Ioannidis

    01/07/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Does Apple Music Deal Mean Labels Are Learning?

    Their disguise may have changed but their DNA hasn't.

  •  
    5

    khutswanet

    03/11/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Does Apple Music Deal Mean Labels Are Learning?

    i believe its working, its about time music creatives own their product and actualy gaining from their effort. record labels have bein making our lifes very difficult. in south africa we need such ventures. it only make sence that people get wat they like not the hole ulbum.
    thums up....
    thabang ....south africa

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here