About Auto Industry

Everyone has their eyes on the automotive industry lately. BNET Automotive gathers and supplies daily industry trends and news coverage with specific insights for managers and executives, focusing on the major auto companies and parts manufacturers. In addition to detailed auto company trends and profiles, we report on new alliances and partnerships, new models, mergers and acquisitions, labor management, auto unions, investments, and other key issues related to this sector of business.

Consumer Reports Gives Nod to Ford Reliability

By Jim Motavalli | Oct 28, 2009

Consumer Reports has a reputation for favoring foreign cars and trucks, and for that reason it may have been something of a relief when its 2009 Annual Car Reliability Survey had such good things to say about at least one American carmaker—Ford.

The latest survey found 90 percent (46 of 51) of Ford, Mercury and Lincoln cars and trucks enjoying average or above-average reliability. The Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan were in second place among family sedans, with only the super-reliable Toyota Prius topping them. They left the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry in the dust, and the sophisticated Lincoln MKZ edged out the Acura TL and Lexus ES.

Also scoring well was the Ford Flex SUV, though a plethora of all-wheel-drive Lincolns—the MKS (based on the Taurus), MKX (Edge) and MKZ (Fusion)—were below average. An American car (the Buick Regal) last topped the Accord and Camry in CU reliability scores in 2004.

Why Ford? Jake Fisher, a Consumer Reports auto test spokesman, said that the key is model longevity. He points out that the current Ford Focus “came out in 1999 and hasn’t changed much. It was unreliable at first, but now it’s a top performer. Instead of redesigning it, Ford tweaked it and got the bugs out. Instead of a clean sheet of paper, Ford went with slight modification, and the result is a car that’s more reliable than the Toyota Corolla.”

The Fusion was “freshened” rather than redesigned, he said, and that also allowed it to be continually improved, said Fisher. That’s illustrated by our two photos here: The top one is the 2010 Fusion, and below is the 2006 model. Not a total rethink, certainly.

For this reason, CU says, consumers should consider waiting out a model’s inaugural year. “Our data shows time and time again that the worst reliability is right when new models are introduced,” Fisher said.

Ford doesn’t argue with Fisher’s assessment, though it is also quick to point out that it does occasionally replace its cars and trucks. According to Graydon Reitz, director of Americas quality for Ford, “We do continuously improve our models—design improvements, manufacturing process improvements—on many of the parts of the car that the consumer doesn’t see or touch. The vehicles we build this week are better than the cars we built last week, and it goes on, week after week, month after week.”

According to Reitz, Ford is “right now comparable in quality to Honda and Toyota, and the cars and trucks will be superior in the near future. We are seeing people moving from the Prius to the Fusion Hybrid, or from the Accord to the Fusion.” He said that the CU citation will help change the perception that Japanese cars have the best build quality, and that this has been demonstrated in Ford’s 2009 market-share gains.

Asked to name another “most improved” brand, Fisher pointed to Korea’s Hyundai/Kia twins, which he said have been “on the rise for a while in how they perform, and in terms of reliability, safety and fuel efficiency. And interior quality and ride are very competitive.”

Another CU finding, Fisher said, is that “Toyota has proven it is not always perfect, and Honda, while not falling off, is seen to be falling behind. For instance, Honda is known for fuel efficiency, but the current Accord is not all that fuel-efficient. It’s still up there in reliability, though.”

Of GM’s 48 models, 20 had average reliability scores, and the Chevrolet Malibu was better than average and “on par with the most reliable family sedans.” The Buick Lucerne also did well. Chrysler had the worst performance, with more than a third “much worse than average,” including the new car-based Dodge Journey SUV.

Fisher said he himself drives mostly test cars, and owns two Japanese-built track vehicles. His wife drives a Prius, though. “The main story is that when looking for a reliable car, you don’t have to only consider Honda and Toyota—you can look at Ford, too.”

Jim Motavalli is the author of Forward Drive: The Race to Build Clean Cars for the Future, among other books. He has been covering the environmental side of the auto industry for more than a decade, and writes regularly on those topics for the New York Times.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Report: Ford's Reputation Among New-Car Shoppers Shines, While Chrysler's Sags

    Edmunds - 77 days 14 hours 5 minutes ago

    Date posted: 09-04-2009 NEW YORK — Chrysler needs to do some serious work to polish up its reputation with new-car shoppers, according to a new survey by Consumer Reports. On the other hand, Ford appears to have a solid reputation with new-car shoppers, says the consumer watchdog. The survey initially focused on how strong the "buy American"...

  • Cash for Clunkers has been an equal opportunity incentive

    BusinessWeek - 107 days 9 hours 21 minutes ago

    Posted by: David Welch on August 05 When the governments cash for clunkers program kicked off in late July, the early word was that it was helping foreign carmakers more than giving a sales boost to Detroit. That stands to reason. Japanese and Korean carmakers have a better image when it comes to selling efficient cars. So one would think...

  • Mobile Banking 2.0: iPhone Edition | Online Banking Report

    The Bankwatch - 245 days 3 hours 49 minutes ago

    I have been pre-occupied with the banking and economic crisis, so it was a welcome relief to read the latest Online Banking Report that covers the iphone and banking.  I have been on Blackberry for 10 years, but I am shifting to iphone when the 09 model appears.  Reason is that it just changes everything in terms of experience, usability and...

  • Leaked Volvo / Mack Trucks Memo – Good for them!

    Tribble Ad Agency - 161 days 13 hours 17 minutes ago

    I wish all companies followed suit, below is the entire leaked memo. NOTICE DATE: June 12, 2009 TO: All EDTC Employees Subject: First Electric Car at a Volvo Group NA Facility You may have noticed the electric Mini-Cooper parked next to one of the shop doors this week and wondered why? The Mini-Cooper is full electric-powered car...

  • Government failing at fuel-efficiency message with clunkers program?

    Auto News - 98 days 12 hours 46 minutes ago

    The government's cash for clunkers campaign may have been designed to get consumers to trade in gas guzzlers for small, fuel-efficient cars, but many car shoppers are showing interest in trucks despite the feds' promotion

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    rsqrd

    10/29/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Consumer Reports Gives Nod to Ford Reliability

    Having owned a 1989 Ford Taurus that I endured 2 fuel pump failures (it is mounted within the gas tank and cost $600 ea. to replace at that time) and a transmission failure at 75K miles that sent the car to the recyler, I have been unempressed with Ford's reliability. That car was replaced with a 1996 Maxima and at 150K miles I have replaced 2 CV boots, 2 brake pad replacements, 2 starters, 1 exhaust system and I'm on my 3rd set of tires. Based on this and Consumer Reports statistical data some Japanese car makers make a more reliable product. That's because they studied the works of Demming who worked at Bell Labs in NJ whose job it was to discover a methodology to make phones reliable, but the technique can be applied to any product. Toyota, Honda, Nissan etc. read his book. Ford, GM etc. didn't, until maybe recently. Its not Consumer Reports bias that some Manufacturers produts are more reliable its the fact that various manufacturers have chosed to make their products more appealing by making them more reliable. In the late 1980's Cadillac won the Baldridge Quality Award. They won it, not for making their cars more reliable, but because they efficiently and reliably picked up up and towed their cars to the dealer when they failed. I guess that's nice but I think most owners would have been happier if the cars didn't break down. It would be nice if Ford finally is making a more reliable product and hopefully that can be supported by statistical evidence.

  •  
    2

    rsqrd

    10/29/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Consumer Reports Gives Nod to Ford Reliability

    Having owned a 1989 Ford Taurus that I endured 2 fuel pump failures (it is mounted within the gas tank and cost $600 ea. to replace at that time) and a transmission failure at 75K miles that sent the car to the recyler, I have been unempressed with Ford's reliability. That car was replaced with a 1996 Maxima and at 150K miles I have replaced 2 CV boots, 2 brake pad replacements, 2 starters, 1 exhaust system and I'm on my 3rd set of tires. Based on this and Consumer Reports statistical data some Japanese car makers make a more reliable product. That's because they studied the works of Demming who worked at Bell Labs in NJ whose job it was to discover a methodology to make phones reliable, but the technique can be applied to any product. Toyota, Honda, Nissan etc. read his book. Ford, GM etc. didn't, until maybe recently. Its not Consumer Reports bias that some Manufacturers produts are more reliable its the fact that various manufacturers have chosed to make their products more appealing by making them more reliable. In the late 1980's Cadillac won the Baldridge Quality Award. They won it, not for making their cars more reliable, but because they efficiently and reliably picked you up and towed your car to the dealer when they failed. I guess that's nice but I think most owners would have been happier if the cars didn't break down. It would be nice if Ford finally is making a more reliable product and hopefully that can be supported by statistical evidence.

  •  
    3

    1JaySun

    11/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Consumer Reports Gives Nod to Ford Reliability

    Is Graydon Reitz smoking crack? Ford's car's are as reliable as honda or Toyota..Lets see the numbers! I've owned fords that are clanky, rusty pieces of crap. They use inferior metals on the bottom of all their cars. Rusty break lines & e-cables etc.. the list goes on. American plastic crap interiors. I've put 165k on a 4runner that did not give me one issue but routine maintainance, not one! 2 Nissan Maximas that were great until 100k then Nissan's suspensions fall apart. Same thing happen to two 300zx's and a pathfinder. I have a 03' Tundra now w/ 115k on it and it will put any f-1****** under. Wake up Reitz and give us americans a car that can go 100k before looking at the motor. Can put 250k on the car and motor still be strong. How about the fit and finish of the interior? Even though Dodge is the worst plain, plastic crap Ford is not far behind. Why can't an American car be 10 years old and look like the bottom of a Honda or Toyota? Figure that out and then you can start to make some statements about quality. Until then why don't you grab a coffee and sit in at Honda & Toyota's quality meeting's...."there are no bad car's out there" You should be fired for being an idiot w/ that statement! A Focus better then any Toyota car period! Lets see how many Fusions are on the road in 5 years.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement