advertisement
About Energy Industry

Business in the energy industry is fast paced and ever-changing. BNET Energy provides daily news coverage for managers and executives in the energy sector, with coverage on the major utilities, energy companies, clean tech and renewable energy businesses. BNET Energy offers in depth analysis of green business, the very latest in energy research, alliances and partnerships, competitive intelligence and a host of other global energy industry issues.

New DoE Head, Illinois Line Up in Favor of Clean Coal

By Chris Morrison | Jan 14, 2009

The stars are aligning up once again for clean coal as Barack Obama approaches his presidential coronation. At both the Federal and state level, policymakers are talking about the technology. And sensing an inexorable change on its way, utilities and energy companies are duly lining up to help, albeit for a price.

Within the states, several larger actors are working to pass laws encouraging or even mandating new clean coal plants. At the forefront is Illinois, which just passed a bill allowing $18 million for a full-size clean coal plant some 25 miles southeast of Springfield. The two companies that will construct and operate the plant are Tenaska and MDL Holding, both privately held, while ComEd, a division of Exelon, would be required to buy electricity from the plant, provided rates didn’t rise too high.

The bill actually puts the Tenaska / MDL tag-team conveniently ahead of the curve. After 2017, all new coal plants in Illinois will be required to store 90 percent or more of CO2 emitted. And like many Northeastern states, Illinois has no plans to completely replace coal, so some plants are likely to end up coming under that ordinance.

Also a lucky score for the coal industry is the moral acquisition of Steven Chu, the likely new head of the Department of Energy. Chu is the former head of California’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and, like many well-educated Californians, views coal as the enemy. He was even caught calling coal his “worst nightmare” at a speech last year.

But Chu appears to have been swayed by his new boss, Obama, into adopting a more conciliatory tone regarding the black stuff. At his confirmation hearing before Senate, Chu referred distantly to “some people in the United States who feel perhaps we should turn off coal,” according to the SF Chronicle, thus setting himself apart from that group. His party line is now using coal “as cleanly as possible,” as caught by the Washington Times.

It was around this time last year that the DoE pulled the plug on the FutureGen experimental clean coal project, a multi-billion dollar facility also to be located in Illinois. When that occurred, coal companies were furious. This time around, given the rising stakes, they might just get their wish.

Chris Morrison, a reporter on energy, renewables and climate change, is the former lead cleantech writer for VentureBeat. Follow him on Twitter.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • U.S. Chamber Of Commerce Board Is Not ‘As Diverse As The Nation’s Business Community Itself’

    Wonk Room - 6 days 10 hours 54 minutes ago

    The U.S. Chamber of Commerce reflects neither the politics nor the priorities of the business community of the United States. The Chamber is spending hundreds of millions of dollars from its corporate members against President Barack Obama’s progressive agenda of health care, clean energy, and financial reform. The “principal governing and...

  • Obama's support for CO2 cap, clean coal raises questions

    Platts - 266 days 14 hours 3 minutes ago

    New York (Platts)--27Feb2009 While "clean coal" got a nod from President Barack Obama as a future source of low-carbon energy during his first address to Congress, some coal industry supporters were left wondering about costs, timeframes and how the country will combine carbon capture and sequestration with emission limits on greenhouse gas....

  • Is it time to haul ash? Maybe kick a little ash, too?

    ZDNet - 319 days 5 hours 14 minutes ago

    Today the bloviation moves to the U.S. Senate, where it feels right at home. It about the runaway Tennessee coal ash. The committee chairwoman calls for federal regulation. The head of TVA, whose ash got spread around so mercilessly by nature, cannot give a time for the clean-up to be completed. The utility industry’s lobbyikng group,...

  • USGS: We’re Not The ‘Saudi Arabia Of Coal’

    Wonk Room - 167 days 11 hours 46 minutes ago

    The claim made by politicians from George Allen to Barack Obama that the United States is the “Saudi Arabia of coal” is based on a “wildly overconfident” estimate of the nation’s recoverable coal reserves. The Wall Street Journal reports that the Energy Information Administration estimate that the United States has a 240-year supply of...

  • Fossil fuel battle: who'll reign over America's energy future

    ZDNet - 76 days 7 hours 56 minutes ago

    Forget renewable energy, apparently the battle for supremacy in your energy future is between Big Coal and Natural Gas. Be aware, the math indicates coal has more Senate votes that natural gas.The energy bill that passed the House earlier this year does not taste good to the Senate, so they are going to come up with their own menu of changes....

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    c.marasco

    01/14/09 | Report as spam

    RE: New DoE Head, Illinois Line Up in Favor of Clean Coal

    There is no such thing as "clean coal." It doesn't exist. Coal-fired power plants are not only a major source of CO2 emissions that contribute to climate change, they are also one of the leading sources of fine particulate matter linked to asthma and other respiratory problems.

    Even if the CO2 could be sequestered (and that technology isn't close to reality), coal mining itself creates adverse environmental impacts. Making coal "clean" requires a lot more than capturing the carbon emissions.

    DoE pulled funding for FutureGen because of cost overruns: the project's estimated cost had almost doubled from $950 million to about $1.75 billion. So instead of funding the difference, the coal companies threw a hissy instead.

    DoE decided to restructure the program and back in May 2008 announced that the new program will fund multiple commercial-scale power plants that generate at least 300 MW of electricity, sequester at least 1 million metric tons of CO2 each year, and capture at least 81% of CO2 generated. Like FutureGen, the program will fund gasification technologies used to generate electricity, but unlike FutureGen, it will also support other power plant technologies that capture and sequester CO2.

    The program is on a fast track. DOE expects the plants to be operating by 2015.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement