About Government Industry

BNET Government provides daily industry trends and global news coverage with insights for managers and executives within the world wide business of government contracting. We analyze new and interesting contract awards, government policy changes, and the trends in procurements and spending. There will also be discussions of the sector with a focus on small and innovative companies and business lines. The world's governments spend billions each year on a variety of hardware and services and the site will discuss how the money is being allocated.

U.S. DoD Not Positive on Murtha's Split Tanker Award Idea

By Matthew Potter | Feb 9, 2009

A few days ago Congressman Murtha, the powerful Democratic head of the House Appropriations Subcommittee for defense, suggested awarding a contract to Boeing and EADS to buy tankers. This is a plan fraught with issues especially for a small buy. Now the Pentagon has come out and said that it is not a good idea. Reuters reports that the current acquisition head, John Young, says that a split buy will increase development costs and negate the whole idea of competition. The Pentagon is confident that the new contract will be awarded in 2010. Of course some argue that the dual award will prevent protests that have delayed the contract.

Matthew Potter works supporting US Army aviation programs. He holds degrees in history as well as studying at the Defense Acquisition University. He has written for Seeking Alpha and at his own website, Defense Procurement News.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • DTN News: After Bold Rhetoric, House Leaves Tanker Decision To Pentagon Brass

    Defense Technology News - 107 days 9 hours 26 minutes ago

    DTN News: After Bold Rhetoric, House Leaves Tanker Decision To Pentagon Brass *Source: DTN News / Defense Media (NSI News Source Info) WASHINGTON - August 7, 2009: U.S. Rep. John Murtha spent months huffing and puffing about forcing the Pentagon to buy both planes expected to again vie for a multibillion-dollar aerial tanker contract....

  • Tankers And VIP Helos Prolong Budget Pain

    Aviation Week - 149 days 15 minutes ago

    Tankers are still casting a long somber shadow on defense planning. “The [tanker replacement Request For Proposals] RFP is not out in the street and it’s not about to be out on the street,” says Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), chairman of House Appropriations’ defense subcommittee. Murtha has already confronted new Pentagon acquisition...

  • Murtha backs tanker split between Boeing, Airbus

    Reuters - 278 days 19 hours 39 minutes ago

    By Bill Rigby EVERETT, Washington (Reuters) - The chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives' appropriations subcommittee on defense renewed a call on Monday for the Pentagon to consider splitting a $35 billion aerial refueling tanker contract between Boeing Co and a rival team of EADS and Northrop Grumman Corp. The call, by Pennsylvania...

  • Split Tanker Buy Idea Continues to Percolate

    BNET Government - 249 days 6 hours 53 minutes ago

    In 2008 the U.S. Air Force awarded the KC-X replacement tanker contract to Northrop Grumman and EADS. This award was overturned by the GAO on a protest by Boeing. Secretary of Defense Gates delayed the recompete until the new Obama administration came into office. Congressman Murtha and others have proposed splitting the next award between...

  • Tanker Trove

    Aviation Week - 127 days 23 hours 30 minutes ago

    The House Appropriations defense subcommittee has included $440 million for the Air Force replacement refueling tanker in its version of the Fiscal 2010 defense spending bill. Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), the subcommittee chair says getting the replacement tankers going “was my biggest priority.”  Murtha previously suggested splitting the...

 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement