About Technology Industry

BNET Technology provides daily industry trends and news coverage with insights for managers and executives about all aspects of the high-tech industry. In addition to detailed tech company profiles, we bring you industry analysis on new mergers and acquisitions, tech products, investments, patents, and a host of other important technology related business issues.

Google About To Break Enterprise Dam

By Michael Hickins | Jun 10, 2009

Microsoft fears Google with good reason. Why else would its chief software architect, Ray Ozzie, waste time trashing Wave, a collaboration application that Google hasn’t even brought to market yet?

Microsoft realizes that the search leader has been on the verge of ripping a big hole in its ocean of customers for business applications; now, by introducing a connector between its Web-based email service and Outlook, Microsoft’s email client, Google is about to open a veritable floodgate of business defections.

Google has relied thus far on consumer-driven search for more than 97 percent of its revenues, as my colleague Erik Sherman points out. But while Erik sees Google’s new tool as a sign of desperation, I think it’s just another piece of a strategy aimed at draining Microsoft of its lifeblood pint by pint and enterprise deal by enterprise deal. But where I think Erik really gets it wrong is his assumption that Google is trying to work its way into the enterprise in order to familiarize workers with its services.

People tend to keep what they’re familiar with, and when you are given a certain set of applications in a corporation, those are the ones to which you tend to gravitate in your off hours.

It’s the other way around, and always has been — Google is using its powerful brand with individuals to force its way into the office buildings. Progress has been slow, but Ed Laczynski, CTO of Web services and software integrator LTech, told me “the dam is about to break. The trickle of big names is going to turn into a torrent.” Laczynski said he’s aware of more than 20 Fortune 100 companies in some stage of testing or divisional implementation of Google’s applications as replacements for equivalent Microsoft products. Laczynski said that most of these deals occur when Exchange email servers are nearing end-of-life, or enterprise licenses are coming up for renewal.

The main resistance to this change isn’t from IT or even rank-and-file employees, Laczynski told me, but rather in the C-level suites, where users are loathe to give up Outlook, which integrates calendar, appointment and contact features with email. The new connector to Outlook will allow software and service integrators like LTech “rip out the back end” while preserving the Outlook client for users who want to keep it. “This should help move the game,” Laczynski said.

Of course, Google also has the economy on its side. In ordinary times, most companies would consider email the cost of doing business. And as Laczynski said, for a CIO, the two surefire ways to get fired are to mess up payroll or email. But these aren’t ordinary times, and companies are under enormous pressure to cut costs. CIOs “can’t not look at Google,” Laczynski said. Not only because the cost of Google gmail is between 12 and 20 percent of the cost of Exchange, but also because many enterprises find they can save even more money by switching employees from Office to Google’s word processing and spreadsheet applications. Even if not all employees are switched from Office, each $100 seat license adds up to significant cost savings, and using Google docs for collaboration also allows customers to sunset some if not all of their SharePoint server licenses.

Google has been asiduously courting partners like LTech and has given his company much more support than he received from Microsoft, Oracle or IBM, Laczynski said. “Google does a lot with helping us develop a viable business,” he added. That’s exactly how Microsoft built its application server business in the 1990s, by doing a better job of supporting its channels than competitors like Novell.

Michael Hickins is a professional writer and journalist with a passion for ferreting out the intersections between technology and culture.

BNET User Analysis

Web Buzz:
  • Microsoft's Ozzie Damns Google Wave with Praise

    eWeek - 172 days 2 hours 6 minutes ago

    The launch of Google Wave represents an admirable attempt to advance the state of collaboration on the Web, but as a complex application Google's latest attempt to move into the application space is so complex as to be "anti-Web." So says Microsoft chief software architect Ray Ozzie after speaking at an event hosted by the Churchill Club in Palo...

  • Microsoft's Ozzie airs cloud views, backs Windows-based netbooks

    Computer World - 171 days 20 hours 5 minutes ago

    Microsoft's chief software architect Ray Ozzie compliments and criticizes Google's Wave effort and pledges Microsoft will do the 'right thing' regarding HTML 5

  • Ozzie at the Bat

    TechCrunch - 171 days 17 hours 26 minutes ago

    Microsoft Chief Software Architect Ray Ozzie faced down two hardball questions in a Q & A wrap to a conversation with Wired editor Steven Levy at the Churchill Club. On one, a much anticipated question about Google’s new realtime collaboration tool Wave, Ozzie had put a lot of thought into the answer. He praised the small startup project as...

  • Lotus Notes creator says Google Wave violates Web

    iTWire - 167 days 6 hours 47 minutes ago

    Ray Ozzie, the man behind Lotus Domino/Lotus Notes and now Bill Gates' replacement as Microsoft Chief Software Architect has voiced his take on Google Wave during an interview at Silicon Valley's Churchill Club. He claims Wave is anti-Web while Microsoft’s Live Mesh is web friendly

  • What Microsoft Azure means to corporate IT

    Computer Weekly - 4 days 15 hours 29 minutes ago

    After years of planning, Microsoft chief software architect Ray Ozzie has delivered the foundation for Microsoft's future - a technology that allows Windows applications to run either in the cloud or in-house

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    ErikSherman

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Google About To Break Enterprise Dam

    But, Michael, there's a simple question that you're not addressing. How does Google make money? It's though ads. Ultimately, everything at Google has to serve that end, because it hasn't developed much in the way of other revenue sources. So, ultimately, Google has to be despearate if it wants to continue to grow and keep investors happy. That means more ads or, possibly, a well designed way to make money off being in the enterprise. But Google is largely making the same mistake that the publishing industry has been making for years - giving virtually everything away. And if enterprise companies are to pay Google for services, then those services are going to have to get a lot more industrial in capability and reliability. Ultimately, a company like LTech is bound to say that Google is making headway because it's in their economic interest to say so. As a PR person for LTech described the company to me in an email pitch, it specializes "in helping larger enterprises deploy Google Apps and cloud strategies." What are they going to say? That it has a big challenge? Remember, according to most estimates, IT spending is flat, but not shrinking. Services like email aren't something the companies take casually, and not something they consider a waste of money.

  •  
    2

    Michael Hickins

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Google About To Break Enterprise Dam

    Erik,
    You're mistaken in thinking Google is giving these services away. Google Apps Premier Edition is $50 per user per year. Yes, email isn't something companies take casually, but when Forrester says you can save 50-70% compared to other email apps, they will think about it--and that doesn't even take savings from cutting SharePoint and Office into account.
    Total revenue last year was $22 billion, so one percent of that is still 220 million--a fairly substantial chunk of change in the real world.
    You can argue that Google isn't making a lot of money off this, but you can't argue that Google isn't gaining customers. Genentech is the most recent big company to switch, and I've reported on several others, including Fairchild Semiconductor and Prudential (the insurance company).

  •  
    3

    ErikSherman

    06/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Google About To Break Enterprise Dam

    But for $50 a user a year, most IT departments want a lot more support, and a lot more demonstrated availability, than Google has been either able or willing to muster to date. Gaining customers only makes sense if it's going to be a continuing and smart use of corporate resources. Yes, $200 million is real money - unless it's a rounding error in looking at overall revenue. To put things into perspective, in its FY2008, Microsoft's online services business division had revenue of over $3.2 billion, and it's considered to be flubbing that segment.

    Google doesn't have the time to patiently cultivate customers and hopvully get a bigger slice of the server market, because investors aren't going to be satisfied with that kind of growth. The company needs to learn how to win more decisively in areas that it's investing significant energy. If it doesn't, it runs the risk of being a one-trick pony. I still think that the goal is ultimately to open new venues for advertising, because that's the only area where it's been successful enough on a consistent basis.

  •  
    4

    COBRAws

    06/11/09 | Report as spam

    COBRAws

    I'm a google premier user/admin, I setup this service for my company and enployees because it's SaaS and the fee is low. But support SUCKS, I get a hard time finding a real email address to send bugs or questions.

    Support isn't a google thing, that needs to change because if they keep adding services with this lack of support, those services are worth as much as it's support's value.

    Erik you got a point there, google apps tools aren't good enought for replacing other existing software tools, google lacks of a good CRM solution (salesforce doesnt integrate at all), and better and more advanced functionalities for the existent products.

    IT's and CEO's need more stable services and less betas, and google is made of 99% beta's...

  •  
    5

    ErikSherman

    06/12/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Google About To Break Enterprise Dam

    COBRAws, your point is highly relevant and I quote it in another post: http://industry.bnet.com/technology/10002161/are-tech-firms-trying-unsuccessfully-to-be-conglomerates/. The problem not only with Google but a number of high tech companies is that they are expanding incoherently, much as conglomerates once did. Just because a given venture can make money doesn't mean that it's a wise direction for a corporation. Google can develop software, but that's a lot different from offering a viable service to corporations.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement